At 5/29/07 01:24 PM, Medinus wrote:At 5/29/07 10:32 AM, Floirt wrote:w00t and p00p April 19, 2002
Reviewed by: BiologicalClock
Overall Score: 9
Here, have a cookie....
Abusive?
Umm, I would have to see the submission, and the whole review, and maybe some of his other reviews to state whether that is abusive or not. That little tid bit could mean a compliment or just a pointless review. That could reeally go either way, provide a link if possible.
At 5/29/07 01:36 PM, Medinus wrote: Awsome.
Are one liners absuive? Like...
Yeah.
I tend to delete those if all it says is that in the title and body.
That was cool.
If rated fairly, no that generally isn't abusive, but can go either way.
Or.
lol
I also tend to delete these it only consists of that emotion in title and body. That is pretty effortless.
its was quite funny but you can do better
Thats constructive critism and generally not abusive.
Sorry for the double post, but didn't notice this question till just now. One liners could also go either way. Few things are considered, the ratings, the submission, past review history and what is actually said in the review. However, if it pays a compliment, with a fairly rated review, dont' flag and let it be.
At 5/29/07 02:25 PM, Medinus wrote:At 5/29/07 02:24 PM, Medinus wrote:Also, what about writing in full caps? But it gives constructive critism (Sorry for double post)
No, currently, if a review is in all caps but postive in nature or gives constructive critism, it is not considered abusive and shoudln't be flagged.
As for your previous user you were talking about, hard to tell since it wasn't sorted, flagged all of his obvious one first: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?pagea=7&pageb=-1&sort=rating&user_id=3680 02
For future questions, send a pm to me instead or another review mod if you like.
At 5/29/07 02:33 PM, Medinus wrote: Thanks alot, I know what i've been reviewing wrong all this time now. I've been Saying every all caps review was abusive when there not, and I've also been saying all one liners are absuive, when there not, and theres alot of good oneliners I've flagged in the past.
Hopefully I can get my gold whistle back!
Just to be safe, the only time I ever flag is when they make an attack or remark at the author.
At 5/29/07 02:52 PM, BlackPlastic wrote: Just to be safe, the only time I ever flag is when they make an attack or remark at the author.
-Don't forget, you could also flag a review if it had vulgar abuse to the flash and like you said, to the author.
-If the review has nothing to do with the Flash movie.
-If the review is just plain spam to get you high in the rankings.
Guinness Book of World Record holder for the game Blur on Xbox 360, NG's Legendary Member.
Click my sig to see the best Newgrounds flash EVA! Give it a review as well. ;)
fresh abusive review right from the portal
same here
Smooches ^_^
At 5/29/07 05:05 PM, Aksumka wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?user_id=622316
A few there.
The one for Assasinate Tom Fulp is abusive, you're not supposed to respond to other reviews and the all caps and calling another user stupid.
At 5/29/07 05:05 PM, Aksumka wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?user_id=622316
A few there.
wow, they're some good ones in there.
French tanks have six gears, 5 reverse, and one forward in case they are ever attacked from behind
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=370835 Some down right nasty reviews from this month
Archer I'm a good shot!
At 5/28/07 11:48 PM, kidray76 wrote: At the moment, audio reviews do not have a whistle system. So to answer you quesiton:
No, because you can't flag audio reviews.
I said AUDIO. NOT AUDIO REVIEWS you idiot.
PROUD '06 USER
At 5/29/07 01:24 PM, Medinus wrote: Thanks, but is....
w00t and p00p April 19, 2002
Reviewed by: BiologicalClock
Overall Score: 9
Here, have a cookie....
Abusive?
So definately.
PROUD '06 USER
This guy's latest reviews are blatent copy pastes.
At 5/29/07 10:56 PM, BlackPlastic wrote: This guy's latest reviews are blatent copy pastes.
LOL. Why he did that, only he knows.
In any event, here's a vagrant with three pages you guys can have fun with. http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?pagea=12&pageb=-1&sort=rating&user_id=119 4484
CAPS and spam reviews - 6 or so.
brianadams6501wilson
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?id=376390&page=1
Bartemeus - all reviews
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?user_id=1965835
Get 'em while they're hot!
Yes, Medinus that's an abusive review to, i to noticed that one:)
user of the day has a few crappy reviews.
At 5/30/07 06:29 AM, Medinus wrote: Isn't the 2nd to last (Seen below) abusive too? Its shows no constructive critism, its just insulting the auther, am I right?
Dude, that sucked, learn how to write songs and SOB sucks, they took away Futurama's spot which is 500x better than that shit that has shitty graphics and bad humor. SOB SUCKS!
If you think its abusive, then mark it.
Not much point in asking.
At 5/30/07 07:45 AM, iateamexican wrote: If you think its abusive, then mark it.
Not much point in asking.
the point of asking was so that he could verify that it was actually abusive before flagging it, and potentially losing whistle points. so yes, there is a point in asking.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=381189
First two.
If you feel like it, mark more.
You dont have to ask >=)
At 5/30/07 11:34 AM, Medinus wrote: Awsome, but the first 2 were only abusive there anyway. We should keep an eye out for that, alot of people will be saying its stolen.
Yeah, its only just passed judgement, so its still at the top of the portal.
a few good ones here. Especially doobious's.
here we go my little whistle whores =)
CrazyxDiamond's review (last one)
death32777's review (first one)
Angelic-boy's review (last one)
