"As the old saying goes...what was it again?"
At 5/26/07 01:51 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Struck gold, start from this page all the way to platinum last.
Jackpot, thanks a ton
Yazar the toot.
At 5/26/07 02:45 PM, KaIandro wrote: I've had this question for a while now: I heard a rumour from my friend that reviews only get deleted if many people mark them as ABUSIVE, not "NOT HELPFUL". Is this true? Or do they get deleted if you choose either one (Abusive or Not Helpful)?
He's right, you have to choose "ABUSIVE." If you choose the other, then you are just wasting your time.
At 5/26/07 03:32 PM, KaIandro wrote: So choosing "NOT HELPFUL" just marks it as non-helpful, but does nothing to help delete the review itself?
correct
At 5/26/07 04:23 PM, K-Fox wrote: Meet Mr.Chain-letter reviewer!
Massoro
Flag 'em!
wow, marked as abusive. Thats the first time Ive ever come accross loads of bad reviews
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?sort=date_mr&user_id=1398895&page=5
From there on to the last page, a bunch that need some looking over.
Yet another Chain-letter Reviewer.
You know, a lot of Glock Group flash has bad reviews...
Warning: Sig has been known to cause heart problems, rectal bleeding, and erections lasting longer than 4 hours. If problems persist, take the time to send me a PM.
At 5/26/07 01:59 PM, BranflakesofDoom wrote:At 5/26/07 01:51 PM, Idiot-Finder wrote: Struck gold, start from this page all the way to platinum last.Jackpot, thanks a ton
Still more left.
"As the old saying goes...what was it again?"
"As the old saying goes...what was it again?"
37 pages of abusive reviews. Jackpot.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?id=7464&page=1
At 5/27/07 08:44 PM, blackqat wrote: 37 pages of abusive reviews. Jackpot.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp3?id=7464&page=1
Took an hour to flag 'em all.
At 5/27/07 10:42 PM, KaIandro wrote: Wow, that was a shitload of abusive reviews (mostly ALL-CAPS). Hopefully my whistle should become Bronze soon.
Yeah. I flagged a ton of them, so hopefully I will get my back to normal or higher.
At 5/27/07 10:42 PM, KaIandro wrote: Wow, that was a shitload of abusive reviews (mostly ALL-CAPS). Hopefully my whistle should become Bronze soon.
How many of them did you flag? (I don't expect an exact number of course, just an estimate. It would be murder to count all the reviews.)
At 5/27/07 10:42 PM, KaIandro wrote: Wow, that was a shitload of abusive reviews (mostly ALL-CAPS). Hopefully my whistle should become Bronze soon.
Just lokked at your profile. You have a garbage whistle level like me now. Sorry >.<
At 5/27/07 11:01 PM, blackqat wrote: Just lokked at your profile. You have a garbage whistle level like me now. Sorry >.<
Sorry I mean looked.
1. It'll probably change once a mod actually gets around to looking at what you've flagged.
2. You should flag stuff with more caution. Just because a post has capital letters, it doesn't mean it's abusive.
Give it time.
Guys...
wow, this is almost idiotic.
NEVER mark a review as abusive with a score of 10. the review mods NEVER delete those no matter how abusive they are.
At 5/27/07 11:20 PM, wizardman wrote: Guys...
wow, this is almost idiotic.
NEVER mark a review as abusive with a score of 10. the review mods NEVER delete those no matter how abusive they are.
Gee... that's stupid.
It is stupid. I had a garbage whistle for 6 months thanks to this topic, heh.
At 5/27/07 11:20 PM, Snerd wrote: 2. You should flag stuff with more caution. Just because a post has capital letters, it doesn't mean it's abusive.
That's what I would have said -if hadn't done 4 replies in less than 30 minutes.
Did you mark any as abusive. I hope kidray76 checks out my link to the jackpot.
At 5/27/07 11:20 PM, wizardman wrote: NEVER mark a review as abusive with a score of 10. the review mods NEVER delete those no matter how abusive they are.
That's not true at all...
If a review isn't relevant to the submission or breaks any of the review guidelines it can still be deleted.