well, nobodies around... so i guess i'll go for a hat-trick. found a couple more.
http://www.newgrounds.com/gold/profile/template.php3?id=745072
that guy has some all-caps reviews on the first two pages.
http://www.newgrounds.com/gold/profile/template.php3?id=776226
this guy has reviewed some Piconjo's... = abusive.
http://www.newgrounds.com/gold/profile/template.php3?id=792190
same deal with this guy. only about 3-4 abusive ones.
---
well, thats all from me for now.
also, as i was the number 9 reviewer today, YoinK_VineS did some reving, and he overtook me by two reviews at one stage...
looks like i have a race on my hands here. wish me luck :D
Are "All Caps" reviews really abusive? I don't see why I should flag an all-caps review as abusive if it still gives praise/comments/criticism.
What do you think Marcus?
At 9/29/04 04:07 AM, RedCircle wrote: Are "All Caps" reviews really abusive? I don't see why I should flag an all-caps review as abusive if it still gives praise/comments/criticism.
What do you think Marcus?
i think this:
i do believe that it sais in the reviewing rules that posting a review entirly in caps-lock is abusive...
so yeh, whenever i see one i mark it.
also, another rule goes something like this:
'dont post reviews saying: "OMFG, th3r3 w3r3 t3h b00bs, fifen"'
so when i see a review in caps that sais something like "1337NESS!", i flag it.
Here's some reviews. Some front page movies are a great source of abusives too.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=758216
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=891438
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...ort=date_mr&user_id=204151
(not quite sure about this one, I'll post it just because...)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=906222
To be continued.....next friday.
fucking magnets man how do they work
At 9/28/04 08:47 PM, QuikFox wrote: LOL, dude what the fuck? Thank you for that post, it made me laugh for quite a bit. Kinda made me think of some kind of LOTR movie only with reviews or something.
OGM QUIKFOX THINKS I'M T3H FUNNY!!!!!
lol. I've heard jonthomson talking about idiots who posted dozens of BLAMs in reviews, but I'd never seen them before, even though I've been through at least a few hundred abusive reviews in the past.
At 9/29/04 04:35 AM, M-A-R-C-U-S wrote:At 9/29/04 04:07 AM, RedCircle wrote: Are "All Caps" reviews really abusive? I don't see why I should flag an all-caps review as abusive if it still gives praise/comments/criticism.i think this:
What do you think Marcus?
i do believe that it sais in the reviewing rules that posting a review entirly in caps-lock is abusive...
so yeh, whenever i see one i mark it.
also, another rule goes something like this:
'dont post reviews saying: "OMFG, th3r3 w3r3 t3h b00bs, fifen"'
so when i see a review in caps that sais something like "1337NESS!", i flag it.
Well, I read the review rules again, and there's nothing that says all CAPS reviews are forbidden. All CAPS are banned on the BBS and chat, but not reviews apparently. Since many all CAPS reviews abuse the author anyway, it's not really a problem, but if they've given help or praise etc, then it depends. I think you're right about all that "1337ness!" shite though, it's annoying, and should be deleted. It's OK in moderation, but not for the whole review.
At 9/29/04 03:52 PM, j00bie wrote: roffle
If I only got a dollar for every rule he broke.
His IQ looks like it's lower than 50.
fucking magnets man how do they work
At 9/29/04 03:57 PM, -Mazza- wrote:At 9/29/04 03:52 PM, j00bie wrote: roffleIf I only got a dollar for every rule he broke.
If I only got $1 000 000 000 000 000 000 for every rule he broke.
I'd be much richer then you.
javascript:OpenReadReviewsWin(229993);
that guys abusive.. idon't know hwo to liek to reviews though
LSD!
At 9/29/04 06:22 PM, Salvador-Dali-Clock wrote: javascript:OpenReadReviewsWin(229993);
that guys abusive.. idon't know hwo to liek to reviews though
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=229993
lotta people odn't liek theese movies
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view.php?id=155532
LSD!
At 9/29/04 03:52 PM, j00bie wrote: roffle
best one so far :)
---
also, yes you are right (not j00bie) about the all-caps reviews. i was infact thinkin of BBS or chat. so sorry about that one.
neways, i think that the ones today have been average. but its still not bad picking up a few whistle points here and there.
At 9/29/04 03:52 PM, j00bie wrote: roffle
Can you say banned???
I can.
REMEMBER GUYS
when someone types a short review with a zero beside it, it doesn't mean that it's abusive. It might be mean or worthless then you choose the NOT helpful link. Even an ALL CAPS review isn't necessarily abusive espicially when it's short. One sentence with CAPS won't hurt your eyes.
Abusive reviews are insulting, have links that aren't from ng, insult other reviewers, etc. It just looks than in some recent posts some regular users just send links with non-abusive reviewers that gave zeros with helpful/neutral/short but not hateful comments or links of mean reviewers that didn't really pass the abusive boundaries. You guys just seem do ABUSE the whistle pts, just think a sec before sending a link into this topic.
Some regular are now scared to give zeros with helpful/neutral comments because they might appear in this topic and that shouldn't happen.
bleh that was my rant! GIMME some interesting replies! :P
Just look at the reviews. Just become I gave a 0 in a review, everyone that loves Foamy is bashing me. I thought it wasn't allowed to start flame wars into reviews. Just REVIEW the movie and IGNORE whatever the other guy typed.
The links below my review are there to tell me if you didn't like my review, typing a reply in your review just shows everyone that you didn't understand the main purpose of a review.
At 9/30/04 09:28 PM, EKRegulus wrote: /rant.
heh, well i have been feeling trigger happy with my flagging lately. so i guess i should just mark the plain out abusive reviews now :P
thx for the rant, its welcome, you know.
At 9/29/04 04:08 PM, j00bie wrote: If I only got $1 000 000 000 000 000 000 for every rule he broke.
I'd be much richer then you.
Dammit, you always know how to beat me in this type of stuff :(
Oh well.
Sorry....I'll post more later.
fucking magnets man how do they work
As promised, here's some more reviews.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/195097
Around three.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/194470
I'd post the seperate reviewers, but most of them don't have a profile :(
Look for low ratings.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=995435
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=983798
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=756254
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=986358
And now I'm actually going to mark those reviews instead of just posting them.
fucking magnets man how do they work
At 10/1/04 04:57 PM, -Mazza- wrote: Load of mean reviews, some abusive but not as many as Mazza count
Read my rant on the page Mazza .
Low rating doesn't mean abusive. Gosh. You want so much your whistle pts that you don't see the difference between a short 0 rated review and an abusive one.
I counted one really abusive review on the first link, i will pass them all but I'm sure that I won't find more than 10 abusive ones, maybe 15 if I'm lucky.
At 10/1/04 05:18 PM, EKRegulus wrote:
I counted one really abusive review on the first link, i will pass them all but I'm sure that I won't find more than 10 abusive ones, maybe 15 if I'm lucky.
ok mazza here's the count I found 9 abusive reviews in your links. 2-3 other reviews were close to be abusive but very mean reviews don't necessarily deserve to be clicked as abusive. Just click "NOT" helpful below the review and keep watching those guys, they might get worse.
At 10/1/04 05:18 PM, EKRegulus wrote:At 10/1/04 04:57 PM, -Mazza- wrote: Load of mean reviews, some abusive but not as many as Mazza countRead my rant on the page Mazza .
Low rating doesn't mean abusive. Gosh. You want so much your whistle pts that you don't see the difference between a short 0 rated review and an abusive one.
I said that the first one only contained around three, and it did. Only, it contained two. The 'you got told' one is abusive, it doesn't really have anything relative in it. Then there's one with GAY in the title, insults the author=abusive.
The second one has several 'stolen, BLAM' reviews, wich are abusive too.
And I'm sure there's several abusives in the reviewers list I posted. Remember, a review that says 'BLAM' or 'this movie should be blammed' is abusive.
I counted one really abusive review on the first link, i will pass them all but I'm sure that I won't find more than 10 abusive ones, maybe 15 if I'm lucky.
At 10/1/04 05:37 PM, EKRegulus wrote:At 10/1/04 05:18 PM, EKRegulus wrote:ok mazza here's the count I found 9 abusive reviews in your links. 2-3 other reviews were close to be abusive but very mean reviews don't necessarily deserve to be clicked as abusive. Just click "NOT" helpful below the review and keep watching those guys, they might get worse.
I counted one really abusive review on the first link, i will pass them all but I'm sure that I won't find more than 10 abusive ones, maybe 15 if I'm lucky.
I know that there weren't that many, but all of them definitely contained some. I promise I'll try and look for some better ones tomorrow, all right?
fucking magnets man how do they work
At 10/1/04 05:50 PM, -Mazza- wrote: I said that the first one only contained around three, and it did. Only, it contained two. The 'you got told' one is abusive, it doesn't really have anything relative in it. Then there's one with GAY in the title, insults the author=abusive.
well, I found two. I didn't click on the "you got told" but I admit that one was lame.
The second one has several 'stolen, BLAM' reviews, wich are abusive too.
It still depends on what they write after they type "stolen", "copied" or "get your own style". If they type some constructive sentences or something that is worth reading after those words then it's not really abusive. I found two in that link, they insulted/bashed the author was too much without a constructive sentence anywhere in their review.
And I'm sure there's several abusives in the reviewers list I posted. Remember, a review that says 'BLAM' or 'this movie should be blammed' is abusive.
It still depends on how offensive is the review. If it's short or a copied/pasted BLAM word then maybe it is. Although short reviews like "thx for the blam pt", "I didn't like it" or "why wasn't it blammed?" AREN'T ABUSIVES but I would still count them as NOT helpful.
Anyway, thx for reading my rant and mycomments on your links. I'm sure that you are just trying your best to clean the reviews. That's what we should do: delete abusive reviews/find out constant abusers and what we shouldn't do is only care about whistle pts.
Here's an obvious one Mazza :D
Reviews to check:
-so many ways to die review
-special-ville pilot review (I clicked NOT helpful instead of abusive BUT you can consider it as abusive)
-super shorts review
-story of a BEAR review
-paris hiton dree-up review
That's it. 4 maybe 5 abusive reviews. That's gold right there.
thx for the whistle points mazza and EG! haha. couple of good ones in there.
At 10/2/04 12:15 AM, M-A-R-C-U-S wrote: thx for the whistle points mazza and EG! haha. couple of good ones in there.
gahahha EG says thx. Too bad he never posted.
Bring us more BUT make sure they are abusive :D.
People have only just started trash-talking this one, but already people have been slamming on the reviews.
Enjoy.
Don't pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men.
At 10/1/04 06:41 PM, EKRegulus wrote:At 10/1/04 05:50 PM, -Mazza- wrote: I said that the first one only contained around three, and it did. Only, it contained two. The 'you got told' one is abusive, it doesn't really have anything relative in it. Then there's one with GAY in the title, insults the author=abusive.well, I found two. I didn't click on the "you got told" but I admit that one was lame.
The second one has several 'stolen, BLAM' reviews, wich are abusive too.It still depends on what they write after they type "stolen", "copied" or "get your own style". If they type some constructive sentences or something that is worth reading after those words then it's not really abusive. I found two in that link, they insulted/bashed the author was too much without a constructive sentence anywhere in their review.
It still depends on how offensive is the review. If it's short or a copied/pasted BLAM word then maybe it is. Although short reviews like "thx for the blam pt", "I didn't like it" or "why wasn't it blammed?" AREN'T ABUSIVES but I would still count them as NOT helpful.
And I'm sure there's several abusives in the reviewers list I posted. Remember, a review that says 'BLAM' or 'this movie should be blammed' is abusive.
Hm? Now I thought for sure those would be abusive. Well, except the 'I didn't like it' one.
Anyway, thx for reading my rant and mycomments on your links. I'm sure that you are just trying your best to clean the reviews. That's what we should do: delete abusive reviews/find out constant abusers and what we shouldn't do is only care about whistle pts.
We shouldn't only care about whistle points...But what's the use of clicking Not Helpful/helpful?
Oh well.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=780927
Here's some. The Hentai Girls one, not sure about the WOI one, the DE_aztec would be character spam, the insomniac one is abusive too, I think, and if 'this is gay' reviews are abusive too there'd be some more, but I'm not sure.
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...sort=rating&user_id=516565
This one has a couple, not that much, though. But there's some with author insults.
http://www.newgrounds.com/port...80&page=1&sort=date_mr
'blam this piece of crap' reviews, and at least one author insult.
That's all for now. Still looking for some 'good' ones.
fucking magnets man how do they work
At 10/2/04 12:16 AM, EKRegulus wrote: gahahha EG says thx. Too bad he never posted.
heheheh. well, i was close. lol. i was trying to remember the name, damnit. then i remembered... E(something)Knight! lol. o well.
Bring us more BUT make sure they are abusive :D.
yeh... well, i'd say 90%+ of what Mazza posts in here is abusive links.
At 10/2/04 01:04 AM, RazorDragon wrote: Paydirt
People have only just started trash-talking this one, but already people have been slamming on the reviews.
Yes, there's a few new "BLAM THIS" reviews as well. People, check it out.
Enjoy.
I did! Thanks RazorDragon :D
I don't know if someone has already said this, but at the moment there are TONNES in the dating sims section. Grab them while you have the chance...
