i'm sorry it's been so long guys, i truly am..
but seeing as how i'm not fit enough to be at work this week i decided to help out around here again and found this..

the 0's could you tell me if saying 'denied' is considered abusive i know it doesn't sound like much but it made me think..

reviews containing free blam points saying thank you for the free blam points is considered abusive right?

i only checked the first page because my migraine is unbearable but i'm sure you guys are in better shape then me therefore can continue where i left off

happy new year to you all

http://crazymcfobo.newgrounds.com/review s/flash Danno's Rush
http://lsufan6.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash some here
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /477854/1 and page 2
http://ornge-able.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash few here
http://fliphipzip.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash raid gaza!
http://captianteddybear.newgrounds.com/r eviews/flash/1 some here
http://barracka.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash few here
http://soggycoaster.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash [FFF] Circles N Rectangle
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /395555 few here
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /383785 some here
http://tech-adi.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash/1 and page 2
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /231099/1 some here
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /418096/1 and page 2
http://ninjadog77.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash few here
http://bwb1014.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash/1 and page 2
http://kamakan1212.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/2 few here
http://vancleff.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash/4 BADGER BADGER BADGER BADG

At 1/15/09 07:44 AM, zephiran wrote: I flagged this, but I would like a second opinion

Perhaps I ought to clarify myself. I flagged the only review, not the flash.

FLegma

Two abusive pentagon n´ oval reviews:

http://snigglers.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
http://stickmen404.newgrounds.com/review s/flash

Get these four abusive circle n´ square reviews while they still exist!

http://conorb321.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
http://lordzeppo.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
http://zebracorna.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash
http://starfox221.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /376285 some here
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /386267/1 and page 2
http://somari12.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash Misty's Hentai Quiz 2

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

miniaturekyuubi - did not watch the movie

snigglers - I quote: "Why this submission is not blammed, is a miracle."

http://soccerking123.newgrounds.com/revi ews/flash pong game (he insults the author.)

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

Contains sexual content despite being rated "For Everyone".

http://zero863.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash/3

HIs first 2 pages are clean, but page 3 onwards from where I've linked there are bad/pointless one word reviews. Some just say denied and nothing else, and in one he even admits to writing pointless reviews for for experience.

WoW. I just realized I've been giving some of you some nice presents :-D

http://quiley.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla shKill Will, SpongebobSquarepantsgame, and Draw Play 3.

Madness Origins.

Stolen reviews

But yeah, it's Tonido's song -_-

Here is a pretty abusive user: HellzRage

Specifically the reviews for: [FF] Stool sample, Narutos Gay!, [LoD]Goat and Tree Hentai, Britney Spears Peepshow, and Pile of Dead Babies.

My favorite one of his reviews? "i think this should be blogged. totally pointless and a waist of time."

Enjoy the five points!

• 

  Cortex 'n Tiny

  by plappage-flash

  Another thing 'n thing, crah bandicoot style

  Movie

  3,866 Views

  (Ages 13+)

The bottom review by Bonzi77.

• 

  The evil fly 2

  by mothballs

  Mario spots something very familiar to him.

  Movie

  6,413 Views

  (Ages 13+)

Same guy again as in my above post (Bonzi77), this time at the time of me posting this he's the second review.

http://bonzi77.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash
apparently this guy (bonzi77) likes to write abusive reviews...o.0

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478763

4 Easy whistle points there, maybe more added as people are still reviewing it. At the time of me posting this, the bad reviews are:
ApotheosisJebus
xAnnaxisxmyxgirl13x
amira1295
kuruey

All those reviews either insult the author or say their blamming it.

At 1/15/09 08:00 PM, Christm77 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478763

4 Easy whistle points there, maybe more added as people are still reviewing it.

Precisely the case! You can flag b3rt's review as well.

Lookies!
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478711/1/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478713
http://bakkerkid.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478716
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478717

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

B3rt and Apothesis Jesus

At 1/15/09 08:16 PM, Kwing wrote: Lookies!
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478711/1/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478713
http://bakkerkid.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478716
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /478717

Nice dude, thats a goldmine of bad reviews.

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

I've not blown my whistle on this yet because I'm not sure. It seems to be an old arcade game thats been emulated and then stuck on here, any other thoughts on this or a second opinion?

At 1/15/09 08:28 PM, agustana wrote:

At 1/15/09 08:20 PM, DocSprite wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 8763
B3rt and Apothesis Jesus

and kuruey

Please read the posts above yours before posting. Those are all repeats.

At 1/15/09 08:31 PM, Christm77 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 8773
I've not blown my whistle on this yet because I'm not sure. It seems to be an old arcade game thats been emulated and then stuck on here, any other thoughts on this or a second opinion?

I would certainly say that they are stolen. They did not create the games and did not make any changes. The most important factor to me is that they did not even remove the copyrights or acknowledge the original content creators. I would blow the whistle.

Now these are the types of submissions to blow the whistle on Christm77. I am happy to see that you are sticking with it and learning about the system.

Cheers!

At 1/15/09 08:41 PM, zimzap wrote:

At 1/15/09 08:31 PM, Christm77 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 8773
I've not blown my whistle on this yet because I'm not sure. It seems to be an old arcade game thats been emulated and then stuck on here, any other thoughts on this or a second opinion?

I would certainly say that they are stolen. They did not create the games and did not make any changes. The most important factor to me is that they did not even remove the copyrights or acknowledge the original content creators. I would blow the whistle.

I blew the whistle as well. Look:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xevious

It's an old arcade game, and they didn't change a thing.

There's this one as well:

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

It's copyrighted by Atari, flag it as well!

At 11/30/08 05:23 PM, Malachy wrote:

Reviews which aren't about the submission are abusive. Saying "I loved all of the kittens and the awesome music" for a flash which had dogs and no sound would be abusive because you aren't bothering to talk about the flash.

I just mentioned a spam submission because sometimes people try to steal awards by writing totally irrelevant reviews with high scores. If you are unsure, don't flag it. If you have a sneaking suspicion, be sure to watch the flash in question, flag the review, and contact a review moderator.

Participating in an attempt to steal an award is a good way to get a very long review ban (like 30 days or permanent) or even having your account/s deleted! It's not cool and we only have so much time to catch these guys before the award goes out.

Found this in another thread, so you can scroll all the FFF and DD flash submissions and flag the highscored ones as abusive too. How about that for cheap whistle points...

At 11/30/08 05:23 PM, Malachy wrote:

Reviews which aren't about the submission are abusive. Saying "I loved all of the kittens and the awesome music" for a flash which had dogs and no sound would be abusive because you aren't bothering to talk about the flash.

I just mentioned a spam submission because sometimes people try to steal awards by writing totally irrelevant reviews with high scores. If you are unsure, don't flag it. If you have a sneaking suspicion, be sure to watch the flash in question, flag the review, and contact a review moderator.

Participating in an attempt to steal an award is a good way to get a very long review ban (like 30 days or permanent) or even having your account/s deleted! It's not cool and we only have so much time to catch these guys before the award goes out.

Found this in another thread, so you can scroll all the FFF and DD flash submissions and flag the highscored ones as abusive too. How about that for cheap whistle points...

Would you mind linking that thread to I can have a look what else was said in it please? I dare say a couple others would like to see it to. I'd rather make 100% certain that that was confirmed in the thread rather tahn just risking blowing my whistle and having it broken if they can't actually be flagged.

At 1/15/09 09:48 PM, Christm77 wrote: Would you mind linking that thread to I can have a look what else was said in it please? I dare say a couple others would like to see it to. I'd rather make 100% certain that that was confirmed in the thread rather tahn just risking blowing my whistle and having it broken if they can't actually be flagged.

http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/9935 18/3
At your service.