http://sonicunderground12.newgrounds.com /reviews/flash
the one for Sift Renegade
http://sonicunderground12.newgrounds.com /reviews/flash
the one for Sift Renegade
http://thekman01.newgrounds.com/reviews/
- BBM Dance Party
http://anaksunaman.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/21
the first
and the cruelty bears
iot has a text image
the FAQ clearly states NO TEXT IMAGES
btw i will collect it
it can be some use
Ph33r mah l33t sk!||z | copy and paste nothing to be cool | 2012 WILL FUCKING HAPPEN believe |
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /475072 Some here?!!?!?
Stolen Happy Tree friends game.
At 12/22/08 04:04 PM, DumbassDude wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 5112
Stolen Happy Tree friends game.
Stolen from here, to be precise.
Now, what's up with all these stolen games today?
http://sonicfan423.newgrounds.com/review s/
A lot of his reviews are spamming, especialy the "this deserves 200 claps" one
At 12/22/08 05:04 PM, Unknown030 wrote: Solace-Avatar thinks it's stolen!
Sorry, fixed link:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /423865/8/score
I think this may be stolen his other games seem to be from different websites this one from here.
http://www.freegamesjungle.com/disc_batt le.html
Any ideas?.
http://bodvik.newgrounds.com/reviews/ the review for madness combat short. i cant believe he is still giving him abusive reviews even after he already got banned 1 week for it once before. do people ever learn?
A revised reminder:
abusive reviews should jump off the screen at you just screaming 'I'M ABUSIVE' if you don't notice it as such at a first glance, then don't bother flagging it.
the flagging system is not an instantaneous process. It can take time between you flagging something and it actually being dealt with, from minutes to weeks.
If you have a low whistle level, it may take even longer if you flag something that is NOT abusive, because others probably won't flag those. It takes more than one person to bring a review to our attention, so if you have a low level it still has a way to go before being brought up.
There's no expiration date on your flags. you can flag something wrong the day you first create your account and it might not be dealt with until today or next year after enough people have made the same mistake.
abusive reviews should jump off the screen at you just screaming 'I'M ABUSIVE' if you don't notice it as such at a first glance, then don't bother flagging it.
What you lose when you are wrong is more than what you stand to gain if you are right. It's a nasty curve.
Really ancient reviews will never get you negative whistle points. In some cases they are deleted, in others, flags are cleared with no penalty given. In no case will you lose points on an old review. If you see somebody giving off this as some type of fact or rule of the mods, they are talking out of their ass.
That being said, if you really want to help the site out, try to find the most recent of abusive reviews. It doesn't do us any good deleting really old reviews from people who haven't visited the site in years and it's not that nice to ban somebody for something they had done a while ago.
Garbage is NOT rock bottom. You can flag yourself into oblivion if you really want to. But since you will have no effect on things with a garbage whistle you'll probably need to have some pretty bad luck to keep losing points.
The whistle system was created to help artists. You bring abuse to our attention, and we take it off of a flash to HELP THE AUTHOR. There is absolutely no focus on the those who flag things beyond if you are good at it, you get a better whistle and have more weight when you flag things, and if you're wrong, you get a broken whistle and we don't have to deal with you throwing the wrong stuff at us.
There's no numbers, figures, ratios, graphs or anything known about the whistle system. Liljim made it and he's been tight lipped ever since. We don't know. If somebody is telling you numbers or how many flags gets you to what...they're talking out of their ass and you shouldn't bother listening to them.
I hope this helps you guys out a bit.
abusive reviews should jump off the screen at you just screaming 'I'M ABUSIVE' if you don't notice it as such at a first glance, then don't bother flagging it.
I don't want to have to keep reposting this in here, but I will if I have to.
I also have this as a blog post in my userpage. It is linked in my signature text and can be found right here: A reminder.
The very bottom one below mine!
http://tcmfulp.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash
Gimmick admin-imitation alt, spamming the same review over and over again.
Slntcobra1's Review
here's a good one:http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/vie w/452531
Unsuitable Submission
This submission contains age-rated material and requires an account to view.
OMG HE DID NOT SAY THAT!
Unsuitable Submission
This submission contains age-rated material and requires an account to view.
the two that say it is stolen
This is hateful to black people.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /385828/24/score
Go back one page and there's even a few referring to other peoples' reviews and in Spanish, along with typical author abuse.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /474317
The author reviewed 10 on it with multiple alts to try to steal an award.
°_°
http://zoolrule.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash Rip Steve Irwin
http://lonepancake.newgrounds.com/review s/flash Awesome Grounds
http://13itch007.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash Awesome Grounds
http://sanjeev98.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash/1 up to page 5 do reviews with blank spaces count as abusive?
http://matt1998.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash/1 few here
http://iamrunegecko.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash accurate windows sim
http://slntcobra1.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash Curse of the Ware-Mart
http://coolman334.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash Ad: Obama
http://solidjake.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash Dress Up a stick 1.2
ROOTS ROCK REGGAE
http://jaime702.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash
Take a wild guess.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /468256 apedap and Maverick3660