We all (or at least should) have seen the Chef-Aid episode of South Park. One of the famous parts of that episode is Johnnie Cochran's "Chewbacca Defense", which using fallacy, and absurdity, wins a case against Chef for harassing a record company.
I think it's time we made our own version of the Chewbacca defense.
Give me a scenario and I will give you the winning Nonsensical, illogical, and absurd defense.
For instance:
A man walks into a bar, and trips on the wet floor. He sues the bar.
I would say to that:
Listen jury, this is Keanu Reeves. He is an actor. He starred in the Matrix, Speed, and Constantine, but he didn't star in Godzilla 2000. Now, I know you're thinking, "What does that have to do with this trial?" I'll tell you: nothing. If Keanu Reeves starred in The Matrix and Constantine, why didn't he star in Godzilla 2000? Because this makes no sense, this case makes no sense. If Keanu Reeves didn't star in Godzilla 2000, then you must acquit. Thank you.
Here I am, bored with everything.
