spiderman... 3!

At 4/16/07 11:48 PM, SirXVII wrote: -Sandman shot Uncle Ben (I can't understand *some* outrage about this, but people need to lay off).

But it seems to be screwing with the continuity of the films.

Since that guy shot Ben in the first film, then Spiderman killed him.

the thread worked for ATHF because nobody saw it.

At 4/22/07 03:44 PM, Genocide wrote: the thread worked for ATHF because nobody saw it.

What does that mean :o

The ending in Spiderman2 was corny >:C.

Spider man 3 is going to be a great Film and this is wierd they are already planning spider man 4.

At 4/22/07 05:14 PM, JohnStephens wrote: Spider man 3 is going to be a great Film and this is wierd they are already planning spider man 4.

They're going to keep going until the franchise becomes completely unprofitable :[

At 4/28/07 09:21 PM, EclecticEnnui wrote: At the theater I work at, I've seen customers, or guests, as we call them, buying advanced tickets. Today, while I was ripping tickets for entry, two people even came up to me with their tickets thinking it was already released, but, of course, I told them it wasn't. They exclaimed how stupid they were, and left. People have mistakingly had advanced times, but I don't think for advanced movies. I guess they all must be too caught up with themselves to remember what they're doing, or at least some of them.

Heh, I never get movie tickets in advance for some reason, and it sometimes come back to bite me in the ass. I think it's a little cheap that you can buy tickets online and shit while I stand in line because Technology is only one step away from Witchcraft.

Hopefully not too many people will want to see Spiderman 3 in the two theaters that are close to me, that I usually go to :[

This Friday, it comes out! So about 4 days! I can't wait!

I bought the Spiderman 2.1 DVD (I didn't have the regular Spiderman 2 DVD, so I figured 'why not?' and got it). It has some info about the new movie, but sadly, nothing the trailer won't already tell you :[

At 4/16/07 11:48 PM, SirXVII wrote: Here are some complains, this ISN'T A JOKE, that some fanboys have about the movie:

-Venom has yellow claws, he shouldn't

They look pretty black to me.

-Venom's symbol doesn't wrap all the way around.
-Venom suit is veiny and some fanboys think that is lame.

Wah.

-Venom refers to himself as "I" instead of "we".

That does kinda suck. It messes up the fact that Venom is two entities: Symbiote and Eddie.

-Spider-Man's suit isn't completely black.

It looked blackish-gray to me. :/

-The orgins of the symbiote are stupid (fell via meteor).

Yeah, but Peter originally got it while fighting on another planet. They wouldn't be able to pull that off, this way is more simple.

-Eddie Brock isn't a built guy he is Topher Grace.

At least he put on some muscle.

-Sandman shot Uncle Ben (I can't understand *some* outrage about this, but people need to lay off).

Well, it DOES contradict the first movie. Plus, Sandman sucks.

Sandman is humanized.

I don't quite get that statement.

Eh, fanboys always whine too much.

mary jane dies

At 5/1/07 08:07 PM, SenorPresidente wrote: mary jane dies

Link or it didn't happen :o

Are they going to reverse the Spiderman plot and have MJ die, then Gwen Stacy be Peter's GF?

i think the spider man 3 movie will be good

At 5/1/07 08:26 PM, DarkSytze wrote: IGN gives it a four out of ten, owned.

Spiderman 3 will get the last laugh.

I've always liked this series, and this looks the best of all.

Tobay Maguire looks way too much like Topher Grace for them to be in the same movie though. At least they have different haircuts.

At 5/1/07 08:26 PM, DarkSytze wrote: IGN gives it a four out of ten, owned.

http://movies.ign.com/articles/782/782381p2.h tml (page 2 of review with the rating).

They gave it a 4 out 5 stars, OR an 8 out of 10!
Silly little idiot, read the whole review before assuming they gave it a bad rating!

Woot

they are showing free screenings in all the five boroughs in NYC. One for each borough.

At 4/15/07 01:01 AM, Crazywill wrote: That black suit looks totally awesome. I wonder if there will be a fourth installment featuring Venom or something. That might be cool.

Tobey Maguire said he wont be continuing the fourth installment of the Spiderman Movies, since he wants to spend more time with his girlfriend and daughter.

Oh and my prediction for the box office is probably $425,000,000.

At 5/1/07 08:48 PM, aquaticmole wrote: they are showing free screenings in all the five boroughs in NYC. One for each borough.

I wish I lived in New York now :[

At 5/2/07 09:51 PM, MadCow wrote:

At 5/1/07 08:48 PM, aquaticmole wrote: they are showing free screenings in all the five boroughs in NYC. One for each borough.

I wish I lived in New York now :[

Yeah, there's ads everywhere here for 'Spiderman Week'.

My Newspaper gave it a 2.5 out of 4 stars :[
I hope the stupid old lady that writes the reviews is wrong

At 4/15/07 12:40 AM, jon2thejon wrote: Batmans better.

what the hell have you been smoking?

Spiderman OWNZ Batman

I saw it last night. My best mate works at the cinema and he got me into the staff screening.

It is absolutely awesome. No joke.

Sandman Rules.
New Goblin gets owned. Three times. Once by web, once by bomb, once by his own board.
Venom was plain bizzare.

Best line:
"I give you good relationship advice. Phone her up and say: You are good woman, I am good Man....."

Strange thing is, everytime he put on the Venom outfit, Parker suddenly sprouted an Emo Fringe. No joke.

Was fun though, seeing this nerd we've all come to like be a complete asshole to people. And punch women.

But yeah. Go see it. Its freaking brilliant.

At 5/3/07 11:28 AM, MissingNYC wrote:

At 4/15/07 12:40 AM, jon2thejon wrote: Batmans better.

what the hell have you been smoking?

Spiderman OWNZ Batman

I liked Batman Begins better than the first Spiderman.
But Spiderman 2 was better than Batman.

At 5/3/07 02:46 PM, PhatMatt17 wrote: I saw it last night. My best mate works at the cinema and he got me into the staff screening.

*review*

Glad to hear!
Hopefully it's as good as you say!

Do you have a rating (like _ out of _)? I'm guessing it would be a pretty good rating, but I'm still wondering.

Do you have a rating (like _ out of _)? I'm guessing it would be a pretty good rating, but I'm still wondering.

10/10 for me, had the perfect mix of everything needed to put a good film together.

I know I can't say much right now because lots of people might not have seen the film in the wee hours of this morning, but I have one thing to say about it besides the fact I was very glad to see it..

FUCK EMO BLACK SPIDEY! FUCK 'EM! OLD SPIDEY IS STILL THE BEST! XP

My Review:

Let me get this out of the way right now. I liked it.

I liked the movie and I want to see it again in fact. However where Spider-Man held our interest in the series and Spider-Man 2 did what I didn't think could be done with comic book movies Spider-Man 3 resounds with perfect "meh".

The movie begins like every Spider-Man movies should start. You begin to be introduced to a new cast of characters and villians in this film including Spider-Man himself. However, some of the acting becomes weak with veteran cast members especiall with James Franco who's performance could have been better.

James Franco puts out a literal laughable performance as the movie progresses. Kirstin Dunst plays less of a supportive roles and more of a dull one in this film. I guess thats the problem. We were waiting so long for Peter to get the girl and when he got her I guess we wanted him to put her back.

Tobey Maguires acting is straight and perfect throughout the entire film.

What makes this movie "meh"? Ironically what the fans called for the most. I don't want to blame the fans, but when you constantly ask for something sometimes you are going to get what you deserve. There is too much in this film. The storylines are great, but you feel like each one could span an entire films length.

Venom is actually the one that bogs the movie down as he seems like more of an afterthought and less like an actual villian. He is here one moment and gone in nearly a blink of an eye. Eddie Brock however is a wonderful character and Topher Grace plays him very well.

Gwen Stacy only seems to be around to drive the plot towards Venom who is in reality an afterthough. You just don't see him long enough for the villian to effect you like he should. She's interesting, but a plot point that is mundane as the movie itself.

Flint Marko is a sympethetic villian and the one that everyone cares about more than any other.

What's great about this film is Spidey gone bad. You are always entertained during these moments. Spider-Man gone bad is film having fun with itself and it works.

I'll give this movie:
3 and half out of 5

Slightly better thant the first and not even close to what the second one was. Simple fun and a good movie to sit through. Should rename the film to Spider-Man Cries A Lot.

I'm going to see it in Imax in a half an hour :D

At 5/4/07 07:50 PM, the-dunce wrote: I'm going to see it in Imax in a half an hour :D

I saw 300 in IMAX.
I probably won't see Spiderman in IMAX tho :[