At 8/29/03 12:26 AM, Recon_Rebel wrote:

At 8/29/03 12:12 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Bila squeezed past Recon to just barely take #7

By the skin on his teeth is more like it. Damn, I'm gonna have to start dropping more 5's on submissions!

Little MINI-UPDATE here (hey, Dogma does 'em, why can't I? #;-}>)

as of 10:45 AM ET today, that is, 7:45 AM your time...

Bila's saves: 6622
Recon's saves: 6628

Congrats, you're back in front of 'im... for now! Keep it up or be trampled underfoot.

Ha looks like im falling fast well not that active in points anymore but i can remember the day when i was doing about 70 a day heh, well just saying hi...

~X~

At 8/30/03 05:39 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Ha looks like im falling fast well not that active in points anymore but i can remember the day when i was doing about 70 a day heh, well just saying hi...

~X~

damn your still on the top 50? how many points are you getting now then?

Hmph! At least there were two posts in this thread waiting for me upon my return. Better than the absolute NOTHING in the other. #;-}>

At 8/30/03 06:00 PM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 8/30/03 05:39 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Ha looks like im falling fast well not that active in points anymore but i can remember the day when i was doing about 70 a day heh, well just saying hi...

~X~

Heya, Xwayneman. Your reviewing prowess, as always, astounds.

I happened to go through the ~90 movies I've reviewed and vote on them all a few hours ago, and I noticed you were the last reviewer (ranging from May to August) on about 10 of them. Impressive indeed. #;-}>

damn your still on the top 50? how many points are you getting now then?

If reviews were points, he'd be competing with fixit in terms of per day averages, I think. #;-}>

At 9/1/03 12:01 PM, gfoxcook wrote: Heya, Xwayneman. Your reviewing prowess, as always, astounds.

I happened to go through the ~90 movies I've reviewed and vote on them all a few hours ago, and I noticed you were the last reviewer (ranging from May to August) on about 10 of them. Impressive indeed. #;-}>

damn your still on the top 50? how many points are you getting now then?

If reviews were points, he'd be competing with fixit in terms of per day averages, I think. #;-}>

Heh thx, well reviews i like doing them they do take alot more time then a vote though, but its all part of newgrounds, just like reviewing i guess as do a few of us...

~X~

At 9/2/03 04:13 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Heh thx, well reviews i like doing them they do take alot more time then a vote though, but its all part of newgrounds, just like reviewing i guess as do a few of us...

~X~

That they do, that they do.

There are new entries that I just know I HAVE to review, but sometimes I need to do something else, and I don't get a review in until later, if ever. And then there are my favorite NG flashes that in some cases I've never reviewed. I slowly review them all, but it takes... some time. I shall break the 100 mark fairly soon. I doubt I'll ever get to 1000, though. #;-}>

You have a top 50 blammers list and a top 50 saviors list. How about a blams in ratio to saves list . To see who blams the most compared to the amount they save or vise versa. Once they've had like over 100 blams/saves first or somthing, I'd like to see that list/lists. Normally the savioirs and blams list are vitrually the same.

At 9/2/03 05:40 PM, Santo_Nino_de_Cebu wrote: Normally the savioirs and blams list are vitrually the same.

They're not. The people with *** by their name are the ones who are on both, and there's only about 35 of them.

The problem with a ratio listing, as you might well guess, is the sheer volume of people that it would entail, subsequently followed by sorting based upon percentages, which would mean exhorbitant tracking due to the ratio methodology. I'm currently tracking 488 people as it is for my list. You would need to at least triple that number to fit within the parameters you've outlined.

At 9/2/03 05:40 PM, Santo_Nino_de_Cebu wrote: How about a blams in ratio to saves list . To see who blams the most compared to the amount they save or vise versa.

I have a 3:1 ratio, (well, I had a perfect one the other day, but I got much more blams since then)

protections rank, number, name -- as of 07/26/2003 at 05:36 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 07/28/2003 at 03:21 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/02/2003 at 02:42 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/08/2003 at 15:21 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/15/2003 at 05:45 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/21/2003 at 09:36 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/28/2003 at 18:45 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 09/02/2003 at 23:45 CDT
01 11,987 *** ramagi
02 10,989 *** RyoHahn
03 9,328 *** fixit
04 7,931 *** thisisasignin
05 7,411 *** gfoxcook
06 6,709 *** DrMSM
07 6,666 *** Bila
08 6,662 *** Recon_Rebel
09 6,381 *** TheJoe324
10 6,038 *** poxpower
11 5,754 Toocool100
12 5,216 *** Crono-
13 5,184 *** alexsmolik
14 5,166 *** Stormwarden
15 4,845 *** NemesisM66
16 4,508 *** helldoll81
17 4,350 *** Mr_Chuckles
18 4,323 *** vuorimies
19 4,249 *** XkwiziTOnE
20 4,214 *** leeboy105
21 4,136 *** chaotic1
22 4,095 *** HeRetiK
23 3,937 *** Newgrundling
24 3,769 *** HAQnSPITT
25 3,632 *** D0GMA
26 3,614 *** RageVI
27 3,551 the_phantom_spancker
28 3,478 *** Captain_Bob
29 3,465 *** XwaynecoltX
30 3,430 *** GridLock
31 3,422 CTTcrew_l2edfoX
32 3,315 *** stafffighter
33 3,223 *** b33r53x
34 3,192 Ppk3000
35 3,174 *** Dark00Stir-fry
36 3,167 Mystboy
37 3,162 *** kevr1
38 3,132 biteme2514
39 3,100 _redruM_
40 3,091 ImportRacer666
41 3,059 pingpong08
42 3,054 *** staphita
43 3,048 Bigmanbrainy
44 2,967 agent66
45 2,953 Overtired
46 2,865 Mike277
47 2,844 *** Denvish
48 2,828 *** _lightning_
49 2,827 *** YoinK
50 2,745 HernetheHunter

Congrats to:

gfoxcook on his promotion to Elite Guard Lieutenant Colonel (9th)
Bila on his promotion to Elite Guard Major (12th)
TheJoe324 on his promotion to Elite Guard General (4th)
vuorimies on his promotion to Elite Guard Second Lieutenant (25th) &
D0GMA on his promotion to Elite Guard First Lieutenant (17th)

since the last update of the list.

Welcome to:

No one.

Farewell to:

No one.

DANGER ZONE:

HernetheHunter remains in 50th, while Yoink is passed by Denvish and lightning to drop him to 49th place. Both don't have all that much to worry about, though dl_Monk, FlameClock, and AdrenalineMJ (formerly lordfril) are all within 100-250ish saves behind them, so things could get interesting during September with three top 50 Blam list members gunning for joining the saves list as well.

Greg's Notes:

Neat note of the day: alexsmolik managed to move up from 5148 blams and 6137 saves last update to 5184 blams and 6173 saves. If you don't see what I mean, the last two digits of both his blams and saves flipped, while the rest of the numbers stayed the same. Wheeeee!

Bila is still just above Recon, by less than 10 points. Ay-yi-yi.

Crono- finally did some realy moving on this list, jumping over Stormwarden (who I'm aiming for on the top 50 combined) and alexsmolik for #12

D0GMA similarly jumped up over spancker and RageVI to #25

Captain Bob edged past XwaynecoltX for #28

GridLock, despite his prophesised departure, moved up past the dormant CTTcrew for #30

Mystboy passed kevr1 for lucky #36

biteme passed poor ol' redrum for #38

pingpong bounced over staphita and grabbed #41

and Denvish, as mentioned before, hopped over Yoink and lightning for #47

You may check out the most recent Top 50 Blammers List by clicking the link I just posted. Enjoy comparing the lists to each other and to the Top 50 Combined B/P List. People on both the Top 50 Blammers List and the Top 50 Protectors List are denoted with ***.

At 9/2/03 05:40 PM, Santo_Nino_de_Cebu wrote: You have a top 50 blammers list and a top 50 saviors list. How about a blams in ratio to saves list . To see who blams the most compared to the amount they save or vise versa. Once they've had like over 100 blams/saves first or somthing, I'd like to see that list/lists. Normally the savioirs and blams list are vitrually the same.

That's quite the impressive ratio you have yourself. I do keep track of ratios (blam-to-save in my top 50 blams excel file and save-to-blam in my top 50 protects excel file), but only of the 50 people in each list at the time of updating.

As Dogma said, it would be insanely impossible to track the thousands of peole necessary to form such an extensive ratio list, not to mention track them down in the first place.

You may have 765 saves and 30 blams for a nice ratio of 2550%, but if I tracked everyone down to even a minimum of 750 blams OR saves... it'd be a full time job, cripes.

It's an interesting idea, but I think the minimums would have to be more around 2000 blams AND 2000 saves to even think of pulling it off without driving yourself insane.

As you put it, the list would take more time to update and keep than both my lists combined with Dogma's AND NGling's VP list. That's just insane.

BTW, check out these two guys, they have ratios similar to yours:

Afterburner (158 blams, 2108 saves, save/blam ratio of 1334%)
http://www.newgrounds.com/gold/profile/template.php3?id=327836

Toocool100 (88 blams, 5754 saves, save/blam ratio of 6539%)
http://www.newgrounds.com/gold/profile/template.php3?id=376279

At 9/3/03 02:49 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
Afterburner (158 blams, 2108 saves, save/blam ratio of 1334%)


Toocool100 (88 blams, 5754 saves, save/blam ratio of 6539%)

On the other end of the spectrum, we have Matt_Hardy with a 32,467% Blam ratio. Almost makes TheJoe's 302% looks like a pittance lol

Shit ... I have to be more careful in the future.
I'm losing all my "power"...
But that's fine I guess... School comes before anything, even fun and sex !

Hey its not dead in here cool...

~X~

i got higher as i tought but not as high as i would have liked o well and yes it isn't dead here it's still very active (most of the time)

Yeah for all

At 9/3/03 02:39 AM, gfoxcook wrote: biteme passed poor ol' redrum for #38

I don't know whether to be happy or not. I kinda like that guy. Oh well, at least I'm climbing the list. What I really want to do is get on the Top 50 Blammers List though. That way, I can be on both lists. I'll get up there soon... Hopefully...

At 9/4/03 01:22 AM, biteme2514 wrote:

At 9/3/03 02:39 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

What I really want to do is get on the Top 50 Blammers List though. That way, I can be on both lists. I'll get up there soon... Hopefully...

Xwayne is at 3709 while you're at 3707. Since he's reasonably inactive, it's reasonably safe to presume that you'll be on it providing gfox posts a new liist in a reasonable timeframe. Sound reasonable?

It looks like I'm never gonna be on that list :-\
Each time it's updated I'm even more far from it ...

@XwaynecoltX : hey wayne! It's been a while! We should talk a little bit ... I'm especially curious about the meaning of the "Mystboy is lost in Irak" post =P

My msn is carle_al@hotmail.com ;)

At 9/4/03 09:09 AM, Mystboy wrote: It looks like I'm never gonna be on that list :-\
Each time it's updated I'm even more far from it ...

i know thefeeling. way too much crapon the portal.

Oh damn!! They fixed the "Under Judgement" bug. And I was soooo looking forward to getting 500 protects today lol

At 9/4/03 11:43 AM, D0GMA wrote: Oh damn!! They fixed the "Under Judgement" bug. And I was soooo looking forward to getting 500 protects today lol

Me too, so much for PROTECTOMANIA. I was thinking "hey, I might actually get on this list!"

At 9/4/03 11:43 AM, D0GMA wrote: Oh damn!! They fixed the "Under Judgement" bug. And I was soooo looking forward to getting 500 protects today lol

yep but if they all count then i'll get at least 38 save's =P

At 9/4/03 11:44 AM, Impetus wrote:

At 9/4/03 11:43 AM, D0GMA wrote: Oh damn!! They fixed the "Under Judgement" bug. And I was soooo looking forward to getting 500 protects today lol

Me too, so much for PROTECTOMANIA. I was thinking "hey, I might actually get on this list!"

Woah!! After that little fiasco, I'm at 47 points since the recalc; 21 Blams and 26 Saves. Except for that time I stalled Blams for my screenshot, I haven't had fewer Blams than Saves since the beginning of March.

At 9/2/03 06:32 PM, D0GMA wrote: They're not. The people with *** by their name are the ones who are on both, and there's only about 35 of them.

The problem with a ratio listing, as you might well guess, is the sheer volume of people that it would entail, subsequently followed by sorting based upon percentages, which would mean exhorbitant tracking due to the ratio methodology. I'm currently tracking 488 people as it is for my list. You would need to at least triple that number to fit within the parameters you've outlined.

I guess it would take years to find out whos got the highest blams/protect or or vise versa.
Thought It would be interesting as I thought I'd have a fairly high protects - blams ratio

At 9/4/03 12:07 PM, Santo_Nino_de_Cebu wrote:

I guess it would take years to find out whos got the highest blams/protect or or vise versa.
Thought It would be interesting as I thought I'd have a fairly high protects - blams ratio

Years? maybe not. It depends on the criteria you set forth. Your minimum was 100 BPs, which is, well, insane. gfox actually has a pretty good approximation of how many people have certain BPs and higher. I forget, but I think 100 BPs was something like 5,000 people you would have to individually track, pulling up their stats and pluggin them into a spread sheet.

If the minimum you were targetting was 1500, I could readily add a couple of formulae columns and sort based on those. I'm still missing something like 30 Elite Guard, so even that wouldn't be perfect, but I already have collect all that data anyway. It cuts out some extremes who aren't Elite Guard, like you and Matt_Hardy, but 1500 is as far as I'd go with something like that.

Hey i think i got a few of the underjudg but i dont think its a bug infact wade himself said liljim made it from 100 to 200 pts for a moview to be protected or blammed so its gonna take alota votes for each movie, those big file ones are a B, heheh

~X~

OH and hey myst i didnt you came here, i just started myself...

~X~

At 9/4/03 12:35 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Hey i think i got a few of the underjudg but i dont think its a bug infact wade himself said liljim made it from 100 to 200 pts for a moview to be protected or blammed so its gonna take alota votes for each movie, those big file ones are a B, heheh

~X~

The "bug" was that everything needed 200 votes to get out of judgement ... even stuff that had already been protected. When they put it in place, Jim either hadn't designated a starting point for the application, or the one he picked was too long ago so we had a ton of movies go back under judgement again. The mark point got changed so it's now only applicable to new flash.