hi can an1 help my?
i hav game a here and it not owkring .

At 7/23/09 10:44 PM, mariogamer527 wrote: hi can an1 help my?
i hav game a here and it not owkring .

Not a person in the world.......

At 7/23/09 11:11 PM, Magical-Zorse wrote:

At 7/23/09 10:44 PM, mariogamer527 wrote: hi can an1 help my?
i hav game a here and it not owkring .

Not a person in the world.......

nice reference, the both of you.

VOTE FOR THIS VIDEO

Sign up, log in, and vote for that one

Just thought I'd support my brother!

At 7/24/09 01:52 AM, zrb wrote:

At 7/24/09 01:45 AM, ImpendingRiot wrote: ...Yes?

I tried and failed miserably.
Either way Selena Gomez is hotter :3

I support this statement fully.

Do i win?

At 7/24/09 01:52 AM, zrb wrote: Either way Selena Gomez is hotter :3

After Googling I recognise her but don't know where from and can't be arsed regoogling to see what she's been in, but all the same.. her face is weirdly proportioned. Her eyes are about the level normal people have their nose, about halfway down her face.. is crazy.

At 7/24/09 02:41 AM, Blackfang wrote: Do i win?

Whilst Megan Fox seems to have everything - great body, attractive, brunette.. none of it really works. She's almost perfect, but that imperfection inverses her attractiveness.. or something. Either way I don't find her that attractive, even though she is.. and everyone tells me she is.

Angelina Jolie about 10 years ago was absolutely perfect. Olga Kurylenko is also smoking, and Hermione Granger is also quite hot.

At 7/24/09 03:14 AM, zrb wrote: I have never seen more than 20 minutes worth of a harry potter movie or book :p

I'm going to assume 1-4 (5 maybe?) were because there were terrible, number 6 because you were furiously masturbating.

Well I'll have to point out Rons mum is quite tidy, and she's of age in all 6 movies - she might die in number 7 so I'd get your fill in now, chaps.

At 7/24/09 03:14 AM, zrb wrote: and Hermione Granger is also quite hot.

Ho-lee-shit is she ever!

She's making an =D face

At 7/24/09 03:43 AM, Duchednier wrote:

At 7/24/09 03:14 AM, zrb wrote: and Hermione Granger is also quite hot.

Ho-lee-shit is she ever!

She's making an =D face

she has such a huge forehead in that pic. like, OMG amirite?

At 7/24/09 02:41 AM, Blackfang wrote: Do i win?

Megan Fox is a poor man's Angelina Jolie.

Still, both of them (and all the other birds mentioned) pale in insignificance compared to the Holy Trinity of Jennifer Love Hewitt, Scarlett Johansson and Penelope Cruz.

At 7/24/09 03:18 AM, liaaaam wrote: Well I'll have to point out Rons mum is quite tidy

What Julie Walters? You wanna stop having Gin & Cornflakes for breakfast mate. The only older woman worth mentioning is Helen Mirren.

Mirren > Fox. There I said it.

Harry Plopper

One thing i have liked about the harry potter movies is the progression of the actors. The first one, they were all mediocre and obviously still kids, but as the films went on their acting abilities have improved and the story has gotten more grown up and dark. It's good that it's not just the same film *5

At 7/24/09 03:43 AM, Duchednier wrote: She's making an =D face

I bet to differ.

At 7/24/09 06:51 AM, Depredation wrote: One thing i have liked about the harry potter movies is the progression of the actors. The first one, they were all mediocre and obviously still kids, but as the films went on their acting abilities have improved and the story has gotten more grown up and dark. It's good that it's not just the same film *5

The films have gotten better (mainly due to the acting like you said, they're actually good actors now) but the last one still sucked. It wasn't well put together at all, I went with my family and none of them knew what the fuck was going on. I understand there's a lot of things going on - Malfoy plotting something (and Harrys obsession with it), the silly love stories, Dumbledores insights into Voldemorts life, Harrys obsession with the Half Blood Prince.. plus all the usual quidditch, lessons, etc.. the film didn't focus on any of that at all except the love stories and they were supposed to be an undertone I think (Ron + Hermione have a bit of a tiff but this doesn't lead to anything in particular like I think it does in one of the earlier books/films/whatever) and completely fucked up the Malfoy plot and slid the Dumbledore/Voldemort moments in terribly. I was disappointed because, although I've not liked any of the previous ones, I thought this might be good. I think the next one will be though, because the book is much more straightforward - not much interweaving between plots, and all the actiony bits are pretty important so they won't miss them out, plus they'll be entertaining to watch (3 kids on a Dragon for 2 hours should be great). I heard they're splitting that into 2 movies though, not a bad thing maybe? And yes I know I'm a nerd, bite me ;)

At 7/24/09 03:43 AM, Duchednier wrote: She's making an =D face

I bet to differ.

I beg to differ more - her smile totally reminds me of the Joker, I swear I've seen a picture or poster or something with the Joker (not sure which, not Heath Ledger, I think an illustration) and the smile is exactly like that. Can't find any pictures to match though ;(

Also, just saw this. As much as it annoys me that they've done something random just to get views on youtube, it's also very well done for amateurs. It's not a great song but it kinda makes sense what with it being a wedding. I'm sure if I knew the people (a lot of the groomsmen seem ginger so I'm kinda glad I don't) then it'd be 10-100x funnier. I'd love to see a better choreographed one, rather than just a load of men awkwardly shaking their hips :3

At 7/24/09 07:46 AM, liaaaam wrote: (a lot of the groomsmen seem ginger so I'm kinda glad I don't)

Ginger racism what? I didn't know that existed.

At 7/24/09 09:07 AM, Coaly wrote: Ginger racism what? I didn't know that existed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_Told_by_
Ginger

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magaz ine/6725653.stm

At 7/24/09 09:07 AM, Coaly wrote:

At 7/24/09 07:46 AM, liaaaam wrote: (a lot of the groomsmen seem ginger so I'm kinda glad I don't)

Ginger racism what? I didn't know that existed.

It's not really racism though, because that implies ginger kids are real people.

At 7/24/09 09:39 AM, Kirk-Cocaine wrote: It's not really racism though, because that implies ginger kids are real people.

...
...
...

/Faceknife.
Followed by laughter.

Check out this article regarding Flash Game monetisation and micro transactions. Very useful article if youre interested in this kind of thing, I think I wanna go down the MT route with Penguinz 2.

At 7/24/09 12:08 PM, Jimp wrote: Check out this article regarding Flash Game monetisation and micro transactions. Very useful article if youre interested in this kind of thing, I think I wanna go down the MT route with Penguinz 2.

WhoknowsmeaUdiO beat you to it =P

Penguinz certainly was a popular game, but you won't get money for more of the same!
Without this sounding too much like an interview question, what are you adding to Penguinz 2 to make it even more addictive, and make people willing to hand out their cash?

At 7/24/09 12:08 PM, Jimp wrote: Check out this article regarding Flash Game monetisation and micro transactions. Very useful article if youre interested in this kind of thing, I think I wanna go down the MT route with Penguinz 2.

Posted that about thirty pages back. Its what started me arguing about charging for a full version of my game (or more accurately, charging for the save game), before my account was hacked.

I'm still not sold on micro-transitions. A large chunk of the flash game audience is aged 10-16, and the chance of people at that age having someway to transfer funds is not going to be high. Then again people play games in breaks at work/uni etc so i may be wrong on that front. I guess the only way to do it is try it out.

At 7/24/09 12:41 PM, Doomsday-One wrote: Penguinz certainly was a popular game, but you won't get money for more of the same!
Without this sounding too much like an interview question, what are you adding to Penguinz 2 to make it even more addictive, and make people willing to hand out their cash?

Oops missed that, ages ago aswell! I suck.

Nah dont worry, this aint gonna be the same :) The first game was pretty much a tech demo compared to this! I dont really wanna say too much cos (hopefully) its awesomeness will be a nice surprise. But yeah, think outside the 30 second arena deathmatchs. No staggy, think more Metal Slug. But with dragon Boss battles on top of speeding trains. And its not just snowy, you fight every where and every kind of animal. And Zombies. Im not saying anything else :)

At 7/24/09 12:41 PM, Doomsday-One wrote:

At 7/24/09 12:08 PM, Jimp wrote: Check out this article regarding Flash Game monetisation and micro transactions. Very useful article if youre interested in this kind of thing, I think I wanna go down the MT route with Penguinz 2.

WhoknowsmeaUdiO beat you to it =P

Ooh thanks. You even capitalized my name properly!

At 7/24/09 01:33 PM, Depredation wrote: I'm still not sold on micro-transitions. A large chunk of the flash game audience is aged 10-16, and the chance of people at that age having someway to transfer funds is not going to be high. Then again people play games in breaks at work/uni etc so i may be wrong on that front. I guess the only way to do it is try it out.

Look at neopets and club penguin and cereal commercials. Kids beg parents for money for any new thing they like. Also microtransactions only need to hit a tiny percentage of such a gigantic free audience in order to do well. I think something that will stand in the way is the sense of entitlement to free content that most players have, and on top of that the fact that there are so many many many free games people can play already.

It'll definitely be interesting to see mochi's release from the get go to saturation.

At 7/24/09 01:35 PM, Jimp wrote: No staggy, think more Metal Slug. But with dragon Boss battles on top of speeding trains. And its not just snowy, you fight every where and every kind of animal. And Zombies. Im not saying anything else :)

That sounds incredibly epic.

At 7/24/09 01:46 PM, Coaly wrote: I think something that will stand in the way is the sense of entitlement to free content that most players have, and on top of that the fact that there are so many many many free games people can play already.

I think the key is to have as much content as all the free games out there, but offer extras as an option to the players that love your game. The time it takes to make a few extra levels, add some new enemys and maybe a new gameplay element is tiny compared to how long the initial game takes to build. You can see it as an investment.

At 7/24/09 01:33 PM, Depredation wrote: I'm still not sold on micro-transitions. A large chunk of the flash game audience is aged 10-16, and the chance of people at that age having someway to transfer funds is not going to be high.

How about xbox 360 and PS3? And as Coaly said, you only need to sell to a tiny percent of your audience. If you hit 1%, thats fucking huge.

At 7/24/09 01:35 PM, Jimp wrote: But with dragon Boss battles on top of speeding trains. And its not just snowy, you fight every where and every kind of animal. And Zombies. Im not saying anything else :)

Rockman X much?

Emma Charlotte Duerre Watson
I am a fan. MY housemate has a lifesize cardboard cutout from OOTP in hi room.
The worst thing about the recent potter film is that she wasnt in any of the 3D scenes.

At 7/24/09 02:08 PM, Toast wrote: Rockman X much?

Never played any of them :(

Its probably not the most original thing in the world, but its gonna be awesome :) I cant wait.