At 6/19/09 09:29 PM, Blackfang wrote: Do you guys like mah new userpage header?!
Y-e-s
At 6/19/09 09:29 PM, Blackfang wrote: Do you guys like mah new userpage header?!
I don't really like it.
hey i need ipod touch games to keep me busy for the next week, recomend any?
At 6/19/09 10:01 PM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: hey i need ipod touch games to keep me busy for the next week, recomend any?
Zombieville USA. GET IT!!!
At 6/19/09 10:01 PM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: hey i need ipod touch games to keep me busy for the next week, recomend any?
Wasn't Jimp releasing Penguinz for the ipod touch?
At 6/19/09 10:01 PM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: hey i need ipod touch games to keep me busy for the next week, recomend any?
Terminator: salvation, but I sadly only have the lite version
You should also look at my latest news post. All about apps :)
At 6/19/09 10:15 PM, Zyphonee wrote:At 6/19/09 10:01 PM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: hey i need ipod touch games to keep me busy for the next week, recomend any?Wasn't Jimp releasing Penguinz for the ipod touch?
Well he put it on there but i dunno if he plans to release it on itunes store :/
He should put it on PSP >=D
I want an upod touch two =[
on other news can't stop listening to whole lotta love by led zeppelin..so awesome
At 6/19/09 09:13 PM, Zyphonee wrote:At 6/19/09 09:02 PM, knugen wrote:Oh my god, oh my god, waste it on a gayChan meme, do it, you know you want to!Now, what to do with post 4k, hm..
Meh, maybe..
Oops :O
At 6/20/09 09:01 AM, knugen wrote: Oops :O
Well, that was a let-down... Where's the epicness?
At 6/20/09 08:13 AM, patu1 wrote: I want an upod touch two =[
I want an upod touch 3
At 6/20/09 08:13 AM, patu1 wrote: I want an upod touch two =[
Christ dude learn how to spell.
In other news, i just got a upod touch four.
I have an iPod touch, I've posted here many times with it, but now I have a phone with internet so you guys will never be without me...
muahahaha
At 6/19/09 08:09 PM, trig1 wrote: ALSO who the shit is rob? he judst turns ubp beuing an admin acting like he was here the hole bloody time.
He was hired in 2008, he's one of the main site programmers.. he looks like a jewish comedian/actor/director who I've forgotten the name of >.>
Sup, bitches :)
I have an iPod Touch 2nd generation, its ok though faulty :X The standby button top doesn't work anymore and sometimes the other button (the menu button thing) decides that it wants to take screenshots instead of go to the menu, which is really annoying :P
I'm now an uncle, my brothers girlfriend gave birth this morning. D'aww :]
Sup, bitches :)
Whats your opinions on tuna? I'm personally not a fan.
At 6/20/09 01:13 PM, liaaaam wrote: I'm now an uncle, my brothers girlfriend gave birth this morning. D'aww :]
Congrats. :]
I've been an uncle for 8 years haha.
At 6/20/09 01:52 PM, CybexALT wrote: Whats your opinions on tuna? I'm personally not a fan.
Me either. I'm not a big fan of fish at all, including tuna.
At 6/20/09 01:52 PM, CybexALT wrote: Whats your opinions on tuna? I'm personally not a fan.
I absolutely love tuna
I think i must be an uncle, because whenever i walk past anyone they always say to me "you're so un-cule"
Oblgatory drunken post
I'm wasted off of real, Northern ales so bear with me.
You know wghat's the worst? People who accuse security cameras of being 'Orwellian'.
I mean, I assume that they're talking about 1984, the scariest novel in existance IMO. Clearly they're referencing the telescreens, trying to sound clever by referring to a classic pieve of modern literature. And OK, the novel features surveilence quite prominently - of course it does. You can't have a horrifyingly totalitarian regime if it doesn't watch its citezens, to make sure they're following orders. It's pointless.
Surveilence is a necessity for Orwell's novel to work - it isn't something which inevitably results in totalitarianism. Totalitarianism requires surveilence, true, but it also requires basic competence, something which modern government is clearly lacking.
The really annoying thing here is that 1984 contains many themes which are completely relevant today, most notably the persuit of power for its own sake rather than as a means through which to better society. The fact that people insist on reducint it to no more than a paranoid cricicism of CCTV is nothing short of bullshit.
Anyway, I'm a bit drunk, so don't worry if my points aren't that well argued. But please don't reduce a fantastic work of 20th century literature to a superficial criticism of security cameras. It's unjust. I'm back off to drink for another nine hours.
Also, security cameras can be crucial to ensure the safety of others, so if it is "Orwellian," it is also necessary in today's society.
amirite?
At 6/20/09 10:10 AM, Xeptic wrote:At 6/20/09 09:01 AM, knugen wrote: Oops :OWell, that was a let-down... Where's the epicness?
The epicness lies in the lack of epicness.
4000 is not that big of a deal though, I will make it up to you after 999 more ;)
At 6/20/09 02:51 PM, Paranoia wrote: You know wghat's the worst? People who accuse security cameras of being 'Orwellian'.
I think it is important in ones life to have things to moan about. Cameras do good, but you still have to moan about them. Its just how it works. If you didn't moan about random things, you'd be left with nothing to say in awkward silences.
At 6/20/09 03:46 PM, CybexALT wrote: I think it is important in ones life to have things to moan about. Cameras do good, but you still have to moan about them. Its just how it works. If you didn't moan about random things, you'd be left with nothing to say in awkward silences.
There's nothing like a good drunken rant on something you know nothing about to make your day.
QUICK QUESTION
I've nott coded in a while so i've almost completely forgotten some AS stuff. I'm hittesting 1 object against multiple others using a for loop and just telling it to hit test against all the objects in an array to stop the player from moving infrunt/behind of them.
Anyway, how would i test to see if the player is hitting none of the objects in the array?
I know the answer is simple but i'm slighly drunk and my brain aint working straight.
At 6/20/09 05:22 PM, Depredation wrote: Anyway, how would i test to see if the player is hitting none of the objects in the array?
Don't you have to add the "!" in front of the hitTest? Like
if (!this.hitTest(that)){
Something like that, right?
At 6/20/09 05:30 PM, KyleDaFox wrote:At 6/20/09 05:22 PM, Depredation wrote: Anyway, how would i test to see if the player is hitting none of the objects in the array?Don't you have to add the "!" in front of the hitTest? Like
if (!this.hitTest(that)){
Something like that, right?
Yeah i know that. That just means if it's not hit testing that object. I need to find if it's not hitting any of the objects in the array, not just object "i".
At 6/20/09 05:31 PM, Depredation wrote: Yeah i know that. That just means if it's not hit testing that object. I need to find if it's not hitting any of the objects in the array, not just object "i".
Have a boolean flag..
var hitting:Boolean = false;
for(a:int=0; a<10; a++){
if(this.hitTest(_root["banana"+a])){
hitting = false;
}
}
if(!hitting){
trace("You ain't hitting nothing, bro");
} Sup, bitches :)
