Just found my panel for 2009's sketchbook under about a half million other things. WHOOPZ

Gunna get on that...sometime...

At 6/6/09 03:41 PM, KyleDaFox wrote: I have a seven year old computer chair lmao, not comfortable at all.

I'm currently lying on the floor. Beat that.

BTW my computer chair is made of spikes and fire.

At 6/6/09 09:18 PM, KyleDaFox wrote: BTW my computer chair is made of spikes and fire.

Mine is made out of puppies and rainbows

At 6/6/09 11:54 PM, ImpendingRiot wrote: I need a new computer chair, mine's like sitting on the lap of a very skinny and elderly asian man.

What do you mean?

Magical-zorse is my current god of programming.

At 6/7/09 01:06 AM, fluffkomix wrote: Magical-zorse is my current god of programming.

Why is that, may I ask?

Please never mind while i sit in a corner of the lounge and try this out, just wanna see if it works.

[code]asdasdasdasdasd[/code]

Most likely to fail, but I want to see if it was like this. Any mod, please feel free to delete this post

At 6/7/09 01:22 AM, Zyphonee wrote: Please never mind while i sit in a corner of the lounge and try this out, just wanna see if it works.

[code]asdasdasdasdasd[/code]

Most likely to fail, but I want to see if it was like this. Any mod, please feel free to delete this post

i tried something along those lines in the Wi/Ht forum. i was trying to add the _blank HTML code to the link code to see if i could make a link open up in a new window.

also i'll throw up what zorse did on spamtheweb a little later. just cuz its so awesome. the thing thats bad though is that the thing that makes it mainly awesome is the part you can't see. it's all the background coding that made it easily editable and stuff.

this mouse gonna get ate (if my cats weren't pathetic wimps)

when the other cat came in the fat one could take a break

and another

At 6/7/09 01:30 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: and another

That should be the premise for your next game.

At 6/7/09 01:33 AM, BoMToons wrote:

At 6/7/09 01:30 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: and another

That should be the premise for your next game.

http://spamtheweb.com/ul/upload/070609/5 719_catvsmouse.php ?

At 6/7/09 01:30 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: and another

Awww, they're adorable, GO MOUSE GO!

I used to have a cat who jumped off a fifth floor, I remember my sister said "oh don't worry, cats always fall on their legs"

Well...

At 6/7/09 01:35 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote:

At 6/7/09 01:33 AM, BoMToons wrote:

At 6/7/09 01:30 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: and another

That should be the premise for your next game.

http://spamtheweb.com/ul/upload/070609/5 719_catvsmouse.php ?

i call doing the artwork.

Then I call doing the music. You'd be surprised of my whistling talents!

silly people, that demo was from 2004

At 6/7/09 02:15 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: silly people, that demo was from 2004

but you havent submitted anything along those lines i dont think. i havent checked.

i still call doing art.

Why was the Hannah Montana Movie surprisingly brilliant???

I went to see it as a joke but know it's one of my favourite films.

Computer chair
i have an awesome new chair for about two months but my computer there is dead so it is currently going to waste..

fluffomix sig
just really read it for the first time..lol
Bold
If you don't bold in most of you posts in the flash reg lounge The forum gods and Luis might get angry..

Daily third, I can live with that :)

At 6/7/09 08:24 AM, Xeptic wrote: Daily third, I can live with that :)

That's not bad, but I long back for when the scores weren't so inflated. Anything less than a daily first with 4.19 would be quite unlikely about two years ago.

Btw, P-bot does have a habit of breaking every now and then, this one was quite odd though. It seems as if the last two day's submissions are listed there, although luckily the awards are correct.

At 6/7/09 02:15 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: silly people, that demo was from 2004

And I'm sure you posted it here a few years back :P

Stages 1 through 3 complete.

My C++ program now takes a swf, decompresses it, processes the tags to find the tags containing the bytecode, processes those tags to grab all the info, then outputs the bytecode resolving names and structured according to relations between traits of method bodies etc etc, and then compiles a new swf on all that data.

Stage 4: allow the program to modify bytecode
Stage 6: combine it with flash API to allow for inline bytecode in AS3
Stage 7: allow for operations in AS3 for my program to inline entire methods of AS3 code
Stage 8: perform bytecode level optimisations on swf
Stage 9: KILL ALL HUMANS

At 6/7/09 08:41 AM, knugen wrote: Btw, P-bot does have a habit of breaking every now and then, this one was quite odd though. It seems as if the last two day's submissions are listed there, although luckily the awards are correct.

I noticed the exact same thing. It's a shame because I think I should be on the 3rd spot there...

At 6/7/09 08:53 AM, dELtaluca wrote: My C++ program now takes a swf, decompresses it, processes the tags to find the tags containing the bytecode, processes those tags to grab all the info, then outputs the bytecode resolving names and structured according to relations between traits of method bodies etc etc, and then compiles a new swf on all that data.

So you are making your own flash basically? I wouldn't even know where to start. Good experiment though, is it faster than flash atm?

At 6/7/09 09:17 AM, citricsquid wrote: Not that I'm much of a contributer to the portal, but I do take a gander every day and it's quite apparent that standards are slipping. I've seen flash pass today and yesterday with 3.00+ that wouldn't have scored greater than 0.90 back in 2006 and would have been blammed instantly, it seems there's no actual boundary for quality work anymore, if it's good it scores 4.20+ if it's bad it scores 3+, there's hardly any flash that only just pass, it seems that people are just voting 5 for the protection points.

Long time no see :). I agree with you about it being easier to get through now than it has been, most good games now get a score of 4.20+ rather than just the great ones.

At 6/7/09 09:32 AM, Depredation wrote: So you are making your own flash basically? I wouldn't even know where to start. Good experiment though, is it faster than flash atm?

no no, my thing would be used to re-compile any swf's from flash/flex to allow you to have inline bytecode and methods, you still need something to make the flash in the first place, although with the parts of the swf i'm processing i could make a swf from nothing as long as it didn't need any graphics or sound beyond API, but it'd be silly to write the entire code in bytecode

Slipping Standards

My very first flash which I attempted to submit to the portal back in '06 got blammed, it wasn't good enough to get through, and I know it shouldn't have got through.
But I wanted to test this theory of NGs slipping standards, so I resubmitted it.
It got a 2.3! That's not even meant to be a bad score - crazy :s