At 4/15/09 01:13 PM, ReNaeNae wrote: Happy Birthday, NegativeONE!!! <3

Indeed, although i doubt he roams these halls anymore.

*Gets corrected by NegOne*

If you're still around, happy birthday!

He has time to gain medals so he should have time to come here!

Woot.

My firstest eva flash.LolOlOlolol.

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

hey guys, just curious, but what is the most extensive piece of code that can be summed up in two or three lines.
for example:

code
code
code
code
code
code
code
code

could be summed up into

code
code

At 4/15/09 08:35 PM, fluffkomix wrote: hey guys, just curious, but what is the most extensive piece of code that can be summed up in two or three lines.

What a stupid question. You could make pretty much any code infinite lines long unless I'm not understanding you correctly. Elaborate?

At 4/15/09 11:41 AM, BritishMoose wrote: ATTN: MAN BITES SNAKE

I'M TIRED OF THESE MOTHERFUCKING SNAKES ON THIS MOTHERFUCKING KENYA.

The octo-mom might be getting her own tv show and I ask.... why. Why the fuck does she deserve a tv show?

At 4/16/09 01:35 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: The octo-mom might be getting her own tv show and I ask.... why. Why the fuck does she deserve a tv show?

Look at the success of Jon and Kate plus Eight. Lots of kids, hijinks ensue and it makes formidable tv (heck I find it entertaining even). It completely helps that she gets a head start with a complete media spectacle. Media spectacles draw audiences, audiences draw advertisers.

At 4/16/09 01:35 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: The octo-mom might be getting her own tv show and I ask.... why. Why the fuck does she deserve a tv show?

What would getting your own tv show possibly have to do with deserving your own tv show? ...is a better question

iPod Apps

I know glaiel has messed around with this sort of thing before, and it's definitley a good transition from flash to iPod, so i am gonna give it a shot. The figures of some peoples apps are amazing, one person sold 700,000 copies in just 3 months, giving him personally a profit of ~= $6,300,000, so it's worth looking into if you've got an touch and a mac.

Anyone else done anything with em?

Octo-Crap

At 4/16/09 02:09 AM, Coaly wrote: What would getting your own tv show possibly have to do with deserving your own tv show? ...is a better question

Yeah, but most people have something about them atleast, she is just a mom, that's it. I do agree though, about 50% of TV is undeserving shite. Ashes to Ashes is on again soon though, so that's a positive.

Also, lawrence fishburne is actually very good in CSI, whadya know.

ATTN: Snakes on a Plane
Shit just got real, yo.

At 4/15/09 01:13 PM, ReNaeNae wrote: Happy Birthday, NegativeONE!!! <3

YOU'LL ALWAYS BE A POSITIVE ONE TO US!

did I get there first this year?

Clement Freud's died

:(

At 4/16/09 09:06 AM, Paranoia wrote: Clement Freud's died

(

D,:

I wasn't sad until I googled his name and realised that he wrote plenty of the books that I read when I was younger.

At 4/16/09 07:56 AM, Paranoia wrote:

At 4/15/09 01:13 PM, ReNaeNae wrote: Happy Birthday, NegativeONE!!! <3

YOU'LL ALWAYS BE A POSITIVE ONE TO US!

did I get there first this year?

Damn it! And BritishMoose got it last year ! Another opportunity missed.

Speaking of opportunities, have you bought your official BoMToons Logo T Shirt yet?

For 12 bucks, probably soon...

A Capt. Moroni sounds like a type of drink.

At 4/16/09 11:29 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: A Capt. Moroni sounds like a type of drink.

Ha ha, that would be ironic.

Nice pic JMTB, that cycling pic I drew really lends a lot to the package doesn't it?!

At 4/16/09 11:29 AM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: A Capt. Moroni sounds like a type of drink.

I can totally visualise ordering a double Capt. Moroni and coke.

At 4/15/09 04:10 PM, Deadclever23 wrote: Woot.
My firstest eva flash.LolOlOlolol.

Fail :P

I know a Nathan Price, is there any chance you're from Leeds? ;)

Also, the Bomtoons shirt looks awesome. If I had more disposable income I'd totally be in the business of buying internet t-shirts (I only have 1, a NG one, at the moment) and I'd snap that shiz up, daw'g.

At 4/15/09 08:39 PM, UnknownFury wrote:

At 4/15/09 08:35 PM, fluffkomix wrote: hey guys, just curious, but what is the most extensive piece of code that can be summed up in two or three lines.

What a stupid question. You could make pretty much any code infinite lines long unless I'm not understanding you correctly. Elaborate?

sorry if i sounded stupid there. im not really into AS.

what i mean is the most common mistake AS noobs make that could easily be summed up.

Assignment does not equal comparison.

At 4/16/09 04:20 PM, fluffkomix wrote: hey guys, just curious, but what is the most extensive piece of code that can be summed up in two or three lines.

At 4/16/09 04:37 PM, Paranoia wrote: Assignment does not equal comparison.

Which could be summed up as:

= != ==

anyone got twitter? My timeline needs to be busier :P

username: AdMan1993

At 4/16/09 05:59 PM, Kirk-Cocaine wrote:

At 4/16/09 04:37 PM, Paranoia wrote: Assignment does not equal comparison.

Which could be summed up as:

= != ==

Or = != == and == != === but == = === more than = == == :p

= != == != === && == != ===; == = === > = == ==

To be fare it's not really a noob problem. I've only just stopped ballsing it up on a semi-regular basis, and that's what, just shy of four years of coding?

The AS3 compiler isn't really friendly to barely noticable typos. The best help you get is 'have fun searching through this big ass function untill you find the cap you missed out!' :(

ya so i got twitter too. twitter.com/fluffkomix

also i was having dinner in an italian restaurant in mexico and i was being waited on by a mexican chap named Luis.

well luis? are you ready to admit that during your spare time you serve people in a mexican italian restaurant?

At 4/16/09 07:05 PM, Paranoia wrote: stuff

Assignment operators are easy D=

Though I've never bothered using === in any circumstance. I'm sure there's some perfectly reasonable uses, and it's probably quite a bit faster than == (since there's no type check / conversion).. but since I know my types are gonna be the same and I'm not really bothered about that tiny performance increase.. I don't bother.

At 4/16/09 07:05 PM, Paranoia wrote: To be fare it's not really a noob problem. I've only just stopped ballsing it up on a semi-regular basis

Yeah I still do it every so often too. I'm never close brackets properly, I'm always doing stuff like if(a.hitTest(b). It's just lazy typing =P

The AS3 compiler isn't really friendly to barely noticable typos.

I find the AS3 complier damn annoying. It always seems to tell me that function X has an error, but it doesn't tell me what line the error is on. Damn annoying!

At 4/16/09 07:14 PM, liaaaam wrote: Though I've never bothered using === in any circumstance. I'm sure there's some perfectly reasonable uses, and it's probably quite a bit faster than == (since there's no type check / conversion).. but since I know my types are gonna be the same and I'm not really bothered about that tiny performance increase.. I don't bother.

I never thought about the type conversion... I generally make damn sure everything's explicity cast as the data type it's supposed to be. It could go the other way, if Flash is doing an additional check to ensure that something is the correct type rather than just true equivalent / false equivalent.

Has anyone done speed checks on == and ===?