All right, didn't get to read the ideas until now, but better late than never, right? They sound good, but here's my two cents:
1. Departments. Same old system I've always known, basically. But take note of this: we're going to need a sixth if and when the staff puts out the Literature Portal.
2. Points. I was thinking about a new point system myself, and I considered this. Say a member of the BBS Department joined at 1000 posts, and now has around 3000. He's been here for, oh I don't know, let's say a year. A user then comes in with 10,000 posts. The experienced club member is automatically lower than Mr. 10,000, just because of his lower post count.
So what I was thinking was, why not have stats from after the end of probation (that is, after full membership is attained) count maybe 2, 3, 4 times more than stats earned before that. Someone would have to put stats at the time of acceptance on the DoDbot account, so that stats could be tracked from there. Consider it like job experience: if you're working at Microsoft, as far as performance-based judgment goes, you're judged mainly on how good a job you've done at Microsoft, not in your previous job at Apple (though previous job experience is, of course, an important factor in hiring). So that's my idea.
3. Probation. The vast majority of users are going to need it, obviously. And some are going to need it more than others: imagine an ex-spammer, a former BBS troll, or joining. We're going to need a longer period to be assured he's reformed. And if a mod joins (unlikely, but possible), there's no reason not to let them in without probation. Probation periods will need to be decided on a case-by-case basis, I think.
4. Purpose. I think I stated my feelings about this last page, but I don't know if people saw, so I'll post them again here:
I'm thinking the purpose should be the same as I've always seen it to be, the same one set out on the first page of the original thread (not at the top, but somewhere on the page wondermuffin its creator gave it the purpose): to "defend NG from spammers, stupid clubs, ripp-offs etc" (his own words and misspellings, not mine), to "defend NG from dumb entries, whistle them, look for entries and clubs that are against the rules etc", by setting a good example, by voting fairly, by making quality submissions where applicable, by avoiding the known qualities of undesirable users (spammers, trolls, and rule-breakers, just to name a few), and by generally contributing positively to Newgrounds and its community.
I'll also add this: we're more than a bunch of goody-two-shoes. Sure we lead by example, but we lead with activity. That means flagging, fair B/P (no mass-voting or savewhoring, of course), that sort of thing. If there's something we can't deal with ourselves, we are willing to call up those with the power to do something (PMing a mod, or if necessary Tom or Wade, with any big problems). In any case, we are willing to take the lead in anything for the benefit of Newgrounds.
Use, modify, mutilate, or discard this at will.
5. Contests. If missions are being run by Department, Contests should probably involve the whole NGDD, or at least anyone who wants to participate. Maybe there should be one each year in the subject area of each Department except IA? One for Flash, one for Audio, one for Art, one for the BBS, and one for Lit when it comes out. Run by either the IA Department, or the Department in charge of protecting the respective area.
6. Personal disputes between members are going to happen. It doesn't matter who's running the place, you get more than three or four people together and there's going to be arguments. These should probably be handled over PM if they are private, but for the public matters, they should be kept to the coming NGDD forum DS mentioned.
OK, now that that's been said... Anyone else still watching this thread and have some ideas?