At 5/30/24 11:33 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932546 (NSFW)
Who the fuck let this pass judgement?
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/805579 (NSFW)
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932648 (NSFW)
Again
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932694 isnt this a reupload of a previously blammed/whistled sub? genuine question.
At 5/31/24 05:29 PM, wolfatthedoor wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932694 isnt this a reupload of a previously blammed/whistled sub? genuine question.
Oh I remember it was on the board before.
Just that I don't know if it was taken down because of the portal guidelines or it was just blammed. Taken down and blammed doesn't mean the same thing, at least if it's blammed, you CAN improve the work to be in a different quality, but if it's taken down, you HAVE to remove the offending material out of it.
(NSFW) https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932702
looks like fetish content despite being rated E?
At 5/31/24 05:48 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 5/31/24 05:29 PM, wolfatthedoor wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932694 isnt this a reupload of a previously blammed/whistled sub? genuine question.Oh I remember it was on the board before.
Just that I don't know if it was taken down because of the portal guidelines or it was just blammed. Taken down and blammed doesn't mean the same thing, at least if it's blammed, you CAN improve the work to be in a different quality, but if it's taken down, you HAVE to remove the offending material out of it.
i believe this was taken down by a mod, i remember seeing it in this thread before
Music visualiser; no animation
Godzilla movie clips w/ voiceover; no animation
Geometry Dash gameplay; no animation
Just glitchin' about.
I love this description so much that I had to immortalize it
"
This AI short film is roughly based on one of my old comics and is more of an experiment. An attempt to produce a movie with the currently available AI tools. When I realized that any interaction between characters with current AI-to-video generators was almost impossible and would take a lot of effort to accomplish, I decided to finish the short film earlier than planned, which is why there is very little physical interaction and the ending is very abrupt.
I may, if there is enough demand, illustrate my workflow for creating this movie. Enjoy.
"
-geneticeye
Note: I don't condone Augusto Pinochet's or Ion Antonescu's actions. I like naming my villainous (or flat out evil) OCs after evil historical figures.
At 6/1/24 05:26 AM, Hoppio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932762
Stolen
https://gdevelop.io/game-example/free/conviction-of-gun-dude-desktop
Unfortunately not the first time it happens
Note: I don't condone Augusto Pinochet's or Ion Antonescu's actions. I like naming my villainous (or flat out evil) OCs after evil historical figures.
Just glitchin' about.
At 5/31/24 09:08 PM, tox wrote:I love this description so much that I had to immortalize it
"
This AI short film is roughly based on one of my old comics and is more of an experiment. An attempt to produce a movie with the currently available AI tools. When I realized that any interaction between characters with current AI-to-video generators was almost impossible and would take a lot of effort to accomplish, I decided to finish the short film earlier than planned, which is why there is very little physical interaction and the ending is very abrupt.
I may, if there is enough demand, illustrate my workflow for creating this movie. Enjoy.
"
-geneticeye
adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932678
Hold on and wait a second!
Why was my report dismissed?
An AI is doing most of the creative work here with the users prompts to tell it how to situate a character or things like that
this can't be a valid use of AI animation
I/we/you can't just write a lengthy paragraph of 30 minutes, spend 20 minutes researching how to get characters to interact, get told it is impossible and then decide to scrap that idea and put out a product that would take months to make in an afternoon
I said I loved it because of how blatant the rule violation was, this kind of thing would set a terrible president for animators
Audio visualizer. No animation.
At 5/31/24 05:29 PM, wolfatthedoor wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932694 isnt this a reupload of a previously blammed/whistled sub? genuine question.
At 6/1/24 11:48 AM, tox wrote:At 5/31/24 09:08 PM, tox wrote:I love this description so much that I had to immortalize it
"
This AI short film is roughly based on one of my old comics and is more of an experiment. An attempt to produce a movie with the currently available AI tools. When I realized that any interaction between characters with current AI-to-video generators was almost impossible and would take a lot of effort to accomplish, I decided to finish the short film earlier than planned, which is why there is very little physical interaction and the ending is very abrupt.
I may, if there is enough demand, illustrate my workflow for creating this movie. Enjoy.
"
-geneticeye
adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932678
Hold on and wait a second!
Why was my report dismissed?
An AI is doing most of the creative work here with the users prompts to tell it how to situate a character or things like that
this can't be a valid use of AI animation
I/we/you can't just write a lengthy paragraph of 30 minutes, spend 20 minutes researching how to get characters to interact, get told it is impossible and then decide to scrap that idea and put out a product that would take months to make in an afternoon
I said I loved it because of how blatant the rule violation was, this kind of thing would set a terrible president for animators
Yeah, that's a bit concerning, especially since they're straight up admitting it in the description. It might be something you have to DM Tom/another senior staff member about.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/1/24 12:17 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/1/24 11:48 AM, tox wrote:At 5/31/24 09:08 PM, tox wrote:I love this description so much that I had to immortalize it
"
This AI short film is roughly based on one of my old comics and is more of an experiment. An attempt to produce a movie with the currently available AI tools. When I realized that any interaction between characters with current AI-to-video generators was almost impossible and would take a lot of effort to accomplish, I decided to finish the short film earlier than planned, which is why there is very little physical interaction and the ending is very abrupt.
I may, if there is enough demand, illustrate my workflow for creating this movie. Enjoy.
"
-geneticeye
adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932678
Hold on and wait a second!
Why was my report dismissed?
An AI is doing most of the creative work here with the users prompts to tell it how to situate a character or things like that
this can't be a valid use of AI animation
I/we/you can't just write a lengthy paragraph of 30 minutes, spend 20 minutes researching how to get characters to interact, get told it is impossible and then decide to scrap that idea and put out a product that would take months to make in an afternoon
I said I loved it because of how blatant the rule violation was, this kind of thing would set a terrible president for animators
Yeah, that's a bit concerning, especially since they're straight up admitting it in the description. It might be something you have to DM Tom/another senior staff member about.
There isn't a blanket ban on using AI in movies. The rules allow it, provided you put in some effort:
AI Animation
This will be an evolving area. If you are an artist who is using AI to assist you in your process, this is most likely fine. We will be removing things like AI slideshows, however. For example if you take an audio track and play it alongside static images generated by AI, that will likely be removed.
Our enforcement will be largely subjective as we get a handle on what cases are valid uses of AI and what cases are over-dependent on a computer doing the bulk of creative work.
Just glitchin' about.
Just glitchin' about.
made using "renderforest" which is essentially "goanimate+AI"
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932862[NSFW]
Incorrect rating applied; this M-rated submission should really be rated A due to clearly visible naughty parts.
Just glitchin' about.
Reuploading unpublished content
Original: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932682
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932901 (NSFW)
Original creator is Sfan (NSFW)
At 6/1/24 02:53 PM, Czyszy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932834
made using "renderforest" which is essentially "goanimate+AI"
Its back:
Ripped footage from Friday Night Funkin' mod Hit Single
(nsfw) https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932953
Almost entirely AI generated
Note: I don't condone Augusto Pinochet's or Ion Antonescu's actions. I like naming my villainous (or flat out evil) OCs after evil historical figures.
No animation
No animation - music timeline
At 5/30/24 12:31 PM, GlitchBuddy wrote:Hi there,
I have been regularly posting unsuitable submissions to the thread for just under a month now, and so I would again like to enquire about an entry into the ROTC. This is something I enjoy doing a lot, and so it would mean a lot to me to be able to join the Elite Guard Barracks.
I've noticed none of the senior officers have posted to the thread since I started posting, so I'm wondering if I will have to wait for one to be available before we can discuss this any further. Aside from that, thank you for having me here so far, and I shall be eagerly awaiting a reply!
Hello, Glitchbuddy.
Sorry about the delay in getting back to you - was a bit busy IRL these past few days, finally had time to get back to my emails and posts. Upon review of your account, I also think you would be a good candidate for the EGB ROTC program. I will confer with the other members of the Barracks to garner their opinions. I will get back to you in a few days with an answer (most likely yes, but we'll confirm that with the other senior members).
Thank you for your interest and your contributions - you will definitely be hearing back from me soon.
Regards,
EGSC byteslinger,
Chief Barracks Officer.
At 6/2/24 12:21 PM, Hoppio wrote:(nsfw) https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932953
Almost entirely AI generated
Ugh. Has AI art, but has [stupid] game functions programmed. AI assets in games are allowed. V0te what you like th0.
Can anyone tell what music was used in this? Dunno if they can use it
At 6/3/24 01:38 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Can anyone tell what music was used in this? Dunno if they can use it
Ugh, you young people with your lack of knowledge of good classic rock music!?!11!?1 x)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zROGY_nH5BU
At 6/3/24 12:58 AM, Exedor wrote:At 6/2/24 12:21 PM, Hoppio wrote:(nsfw) https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/932953Ugh. Has AI art, but has [stupid] game functions programmed. AI assets in games are allowed. V0te what you like th0.
Almost entirely AI generated
I'm sorry
Note: I don't condone Augusto Pinochet's or Ion Antonescu's actions. I like naming my villainous (or flat out evil) OCs after evil historical figures.
AI-generated using Moovly, by submitter's admission
