At 1/23/24 08:04 PM, Dratuna wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915313
Not the original creator. I had to reverse image search this because this one was very obscure and even searching the lyrics won't turn it up.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J35VoSxqdzg
I had a gut feeling it was stolen - thanks for confirming it!
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 1/23/24 08:04 PM, Dratuna wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915313
Not the original creator. I had to reverse image search this because this one was very obscure and even searching the lyrics won't turn it up.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J35VoSxqdzg
And from the same uploader, we have a stolen Sesame Street flash game.
Wrong rating (M instead of A) and also it's a speedpaint.
he/they - pretty cool guy
No animation, just a video of someone punching a box
Our focus is on animation. If you want to try live action here, it must be a short film with legit production value and an animation component done in post production.
At 1/24/24 04:16 PM, Dreggsu wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915408
No animation, just a video of someone punching a box
Noted. We're leaving that one to suffer it's likely inevitability.
Scratch footage. This one is definitely getting blammed since this is recorded via a phone camera but gameplay footages have a chance of being taken down.
If this becomes "Unpublished Submission", this means the mods took it down. But if it disappears, that means that the submission has been blammed.
At 1/24/24 08:36 PM, Dratuna wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915428
Scratch footage. This one is definitely getting blammed since this is recorded via a phone camera but gameplay footages have a chance of being taken down.
If this becomes "Unpublished Submission", this means the mods took it down. But if it disappears, that means that the submission has been blammed.
The submitter also linked what they played, which doesn't have anything rulebreaking but is probably getting blammed:
The submitter and the game's creator are friends - not sure if that's anything of note, but its nearly 2AM where I am and I'm running on fumes.
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 1/24/24 08:50 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:The submitter also linked what they played, which doesn't have anything rulebreaking but is probably getting blammed:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915300
The submitter and the game's creator are friends - not sure if that's anything of note, but its nearly 2AM where I am and I'm running on fumes.
Source? Because being fans with each other isn't proof of friendship nor does it give you rights to post something you didn't make that violates the guidelines. You don't just record shit on a camera and post a "Let's Play" on the Movie portal.
At 1/24/24 09:03 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 1/24/24 08:50 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:You don't just record shit on a camera and post a "Let's Play" on the Movie portal.
...or we'll blam your shizz!
At 1/24/24 09:07 PM, Exedor wrote:At 1/24/24 09:03 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:...or we'll blam your shizz!At 1/24/24 08:50 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:You don't just record shit on a camera and post a "Let's Play" on the Movie portal.
You spelled "shit" wrong, Ex. Use spell-check.
Gameplay footage
No animation - still image(s)
he/they - pretty cool guy
Audio is a cover of "Shinunoga E-Wa", which is owned by Universal Music
he/they - pretty cool guy
RWBY Volume 9 Episode 8
https://youtu.be/J5q-uM0tF6M?si=j6o8mlKDbavN0zce&t=216
No animation
No original animation. A modification of the Hare Hare Yukai ending.
At 1/25/24 04:02 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915443
No original animation. A modification of the Hare Hare Yukai ending.
https://youtu.be/x2iKC0C32-g?si=OGO91Xuz_SAA8R3I&t=48
The only good thing about this is finding out about some pretty good breakcore. (I need to check the Audio Portal more often...)
he/they - pretty cool guy
What a hattrick. Reupload of a blammed submission, a speedpaint (no animation) and wrong rating!
At 10/26/23 06:15 PM, guthrie wrote:Anyone up for a Firey treat?
Back again for another round!
(I was asked to discontinue the chain of Firey reports. Here's a link to the final post if you want to see how long it got: https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/387319/1952#bbspost27782400_post_text)
At 1/25/24 11:03 PM, guthrie wrote:At 10/26/23 06:15 PM, guthrie wrote:Anyone up for a Firey treat?
Back again for another round!
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915557
(I was asked to discontinue the chain of Firey reports. Here's a link to the final post if you want to see how long it got: https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/387319/1952#bbspost27782400_post_text)
but... this was a tradition
it was our tradition
what's next? no more reporting purple guy platformer?
At 1/25/24 11:50 PM, tox wrote:At 1/25/24 11:03 PM, guthrie wrote:At 10/26/23 06:15 PM, guthrie wrote:Anyone up for a Firey treat?
Back again for another round!
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915557
(I was asked to discontinue the chain of Firey reports. Here's a link to the final post if you want to see how long it got: https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/387319/1952#bbspost27782400_post_text)
but... this was a tradition
it was our tradition
what's next? no more reporting purple guy platformer?
They're gonna get caught regardless. All that matters is that you find it, report it as stolen or unmodified spam, and hopefully it goes down
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she - 🏳️⚧️
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 1/26/24 09:45 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915587
Audio visualizer
There's a bit more to that than being just an Audio Visualizer. That can stay up.
At 1/26/24 01:34 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915603
Meanwhile, I couldn't find any animation in this.
There's not BUT I got a feeling that's gonna give the '0' voters what they want. If not it'll get the treatment.
Reuploading blammed content
Originals: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/906103
At 1/27/24 08:50 AM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915694
is this allowed? he not using Gmod or Dreams
#1: Does it use GMod, Dreams, or 3D Movie Maker?
YES: See #2
NO: It is 100% legit
#2: Is it shovelware?
YES: It breaks the Movie Guidleines and should either be flagged as such or blammed
NO: They clearly put effort into it. Just vote fairly!
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she - 🏳️⚧️
At 1/27/24 08:55 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 1/27/24 08:50 AM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915694
is this allowed? he not using Gmod or Dreams
#1: Does it use GMod, Dreams, or 3D Movie Maker?
YES: See #2
NO: It is 100% legit
#2: Is it shovelware?
YES: It breaks the Movie Guidleines and should either be flagged as such or blammed
NO: They clearly put effort into it. Just vote fairly!
I'm going on a limb and say it's shovelware because one main reason:
Tools like Objection.lol.
Seriously, as much as I've defended the usage of GoAnimate, the video itself didn't take any actual effort to make because all they had to do was go on a site or a tool that makes Ace Attorney visuals into a video, put in the dialogue, and have completely 0 input in the animation. At least in GoAnimate, sure, you could drag and drop templates to make a video, but GoAnimation isn't an AI service that does the animation for you. In fact, you HAVE to make your own animation. If there was something in the video that suggested that an actual human animated the whole video, then I would buy that they did put effort in it, because you wouldn't be exactly confined in whatever the tool was used for the video, like for example, squash or stretching the sprites.
At 1/27/24 09:39 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 1/27/24 08:55 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:I'm going on a limb and say it's shovelware because one main reason:At 1/27/24 08:50 AM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/915694
is this allowed? he not using Gmod or Dreams
#1: Does it use GMod, Dreams, or 3D Movie Maker?
YES: See #2
NO: It is 100% legit
#2: Is it shovelware?
YES: It breaks the Movie Guidleines and should either be flagged as such or blammed
NO: They clearly put effort into it. Just vote fairly!
Tools like Objection.lol.
Seriously, as much as I've defended the usage of GoAnimate, the video itself didn't take any actual effort to make because all they had to do was go on a site or a tool that makes Ace Attorney visuals into a video, put in the dialogue, and have completely 0 input in the animation. At least in GoAnimate, sure, you could drag and drop templates to make a video, but GoAnimation isn't an AI service that does the animation for you. In fact, you HAVE to make your own animation. If there was something in the video that suggested that an actual human animated the whole video, then I would buy that they did put effort in it, because you wouldn't be exactly confined in whatever the tool was used for the video, like for example, squash or stretching the sprites.
This slipped through in 2021. Same creator.
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she - 🏳️⚧️
At 1/27/24 09:45 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:This slipped through in 2021. Same creator.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/805517
Just because it just slipped by the cracks doesn't mean it SHOULD stay nor is it legal. It could be that nobody reported because nobody thought at the time violated the Movie Guidelines, because come on, what does the average NG user know ANYTHING about the guidelines?
At 1/27/24 09:51 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 1/27/24 09:45 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:This slipped through in 2021. Same creator.Just because it just slipped by the cracks doesn't mean it SHOULD stay nor is it legal. It could be that nobody reported because nobody thought at the time violated the Movie Guidelines, because come on, what does the average NG user know ANYTHING about the guidelines?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/805517
I'm not your average NG user & I've read the rules of submission more times than you could possibly imagine. Neither of those submissions break any rules & are entitiled to be voted on. Furthermore 'Shovelware' is a term for shitty low quality, low effort, mass produced games NOT movies.
At 1/27/24 10:29 AM, gamejunkie wrote:At 1/27/24 09:51 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 1/27/24 09:45 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:This slipped through in 2021. Same creator.Just because it just slipped by the cracks doesn't mean it SHOULD stay nor is it legal. It could be that nobody reported because nobody thought at the time violated the Movie Guidelines, because come on, what does the average NG user know ANYTHING about the guidelines?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/805517
I'm not your average NG user & I've read the rules of submission more times than you could possibly imagine. Neither of those submissions break any rules & are entitiled to be voted on. Furthermore 'Shovelware' is a term for shitty low quality, low effort, mass produced games NOT movies.
To give my 2 cents, I don't consider subs using objection.lol to be rule-breaking in and of themselves - far as I view them, they fall in the same realm as machinima, where the creator's using the assets of another piece of media to produce something original.
Of course, there is nothing stopping you from voting 0 on them if you think they should be blammed.
he/they - pretty cool guy
