DEFCON Update:
Still slow. Still DEFCON 4.
At 3/14/06 06:26 AM, nimmer wrote:
indeed protecting the portal is certainly more as just b/p and i am glad i could help this club realising that. the only regret i have is that i didn't offer my position to littlewashu myself.
I'm certainly glad you agree with my decision, sir. I think we all respect you more due to your response to this decision.
*salutes*
At 3/14/06 10:34 AM, Peregrinus wrote:
Thank you for your support Sir! I will be checking there more often. For some reason, I had deleted many bookmarks, including the NGPD. It is now re-marked for easy reference.
I noticed your new introductory post there, already. Thanks for the extra effort, Sergeant!
______________
I'm glad people are agreeing with the changes so far. I realize many believe that the position count is getting out of hand, but I still don't feel that way. There are only 5 positions that really warrant constant staffing (Chief Barracks Officer, Relations, Recruitment, Records, Portal Violations). The rest (Portal Ops, Intel Ops, NGPD Laison, Mafia Laison) are really positions that are needed for specific time periods. Of course, there's no need for more positions at this point. However, Lieutenant positions are a different story.
These positions do not really require Lieutenants, since their application here are based on situations that need them. However, if extra manpower (or womanpower) is required in any of these positions, a second Officer can be appointed in that case:
Barracks Mafia Laison
Barracks NGPD Laison
Both of these officer positions are rather specific and don't really require an assistant. However, if necessary, a second one of each can be appointed (and work concurrently on the same level). Naturally, other Laisons to different groups might come up in the future. If any new Laison positions open up (new or concurrent), they'll still be equals and still report to the Barracks Relations Officer.
Barracks Intelligence Operations Officer
This position is more of a support position, as it reports directly to Portal Ops. Similar to Laison positions, if more Intel Ops are necessary for recon purposes, they will be concurrently appointed.
Barracks Portal Operations Officer
Barracks Portal Operations Officer
I consider Portal Ops kind of like a war general for the Barracks. Since the Chief Barracks Officer also deals with Portal Ops, I don't see the need for more than two Portal Ops besides him/her. However, if more than one Portal Ops is needed, they will be concurrent as well (like several generals sitting in a war room, for example).
Barracks Portal Violations Officer - As important as this position is, I do not know if the need for a Lieutenant is necessary. Concurrent Portal Violations Officers might work as well.
However, I am seriously considering adding Lieutenant positions for some of the "Big Four" to bridge the gaps when some members cannot be here in the Barracks. Here are my current suggestions:
Barracks Records Officer - This position probably warrants a Lieutenant, as record-keeping is very important to the Barracks. This way, if the Records Officer cannot make an update one week, his or her Lieutenant can take over for that time.
Barracks Recruitment Officer
Barracks Relations Officer
Chief Barracks Officer
Actually, I do not think that any of these three positions really need Lieutenant positions, as they rely on each other in the first place. For instance:
If the Recruitment Officer is absent and a new recruit comes, the Chief Barracks Officer or the Relations Officer give them the necessary introductions.
If the Relations Officer is absent, the Recruitment Officer acts as the Relations Officer in his/her absence. Also, the Chief Barracks Officer supports the position if necessary
If the Chief Barracks Officer is absent, the Relations Officer steps in. Also, if both the Chief Barracks Officer and the Relations Officer are gone, the Recruitment Officer takes over.
SInce these three officer positions feed off of each other so much, there is no need for Lieutenants in these positions.
At 3/14/06 11:29 AM, LittleWashu wrote:
stuff
While your forte might be on abusive reviews, you can't say you don't flag flash on the Portal! Fact remains, you are not just an expert on abusive reviews. I've seen you give expert guidance on flagging flash in the Portal as well. Therefore, I see you fully qualified for the position. However, if necessary, Supreme Commander Nimmer might be re-appointed as a second Portal Violations Officer if necessary.
As for a steady e-mail address, I recommend www.gmail.com to you.