At 10/13/06 09:39 PM, Frenzy wrote: What with all the review deletion, homework, tests, and the FAQ/Walkthrough I'm currently writing, I'm really getting sick of reviewing. It seems that I review a movie, another review gets deleted... to be quite frank, it really, really sucks, and I hope that they change the system when the new stuff arrives.

Well i dont know, reviews have always been deleted for one reason or another, it is just gonna be alot more faster till they go through all the backup, after that it will probably slow down after that...

And in the process it will get people to really review the submission and be careful about it...

Allthough i do think some revews are getting delted when they did help but it may just be that one word that throws it off...

kwass has really been hit, as he has has over 100 deleted in the last few days, well asfar as my records show...

~X~

Just got a first e-mail regarding a review deletion
One of my earlier 1-liners in the April 2000 flashes. Most of those were awful, so I don't mind redoing them.

At 10/13/06 11:47 PM, wizardman wrote: Just got a first e-mail regarding a review deletion
One of my earlier 1-liners in the April 2000 flashes. Most of those were awful, so I don't mind redoing them.

But it said if you got enough of those type of abusive review things that they would permanently delete you account, I know I have a good couple bad reviews, what do you think will happen with me?

At 10/13/06 11:47 PM, wizardman wrote: Just got a first e-mail regarding a review deletion
One of my earlier 1-liners in the April 2000 flashes. Most of those were awful, so I don't mind redoing them.

So far, I've redone all of my deleted reviews, which was six total. Much better than having crappy abusive reviews sit in my profile!

At 10/14/06 01:36 AM, MegaGold wrote:
But it said if you got enough of those type of abusive review things that they would permanently delete you account, I know I have a good couple bad reviews, what do you think will happen with me?

Actually That not going to happen to anyone. The admins are fully aware a lot of old bad reviews are being deleted right now. Now to say you were currently doing a lot of crap reviews the story may change, but for now it like a grace period for everyone on old reviews.

a lot of my bad reviews from 2002 are being deleted!

At 10/13/06 09:48 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Well i dont know, reviews have always been deleted for one reason or another, it is just gonna be alot more faster till they go through all the backup, after that it will probably slow down after that...

And in the process it will get people to really review the submission and be careful about it...

Allthough i do think some revews are getting delted when they did help but it may just be that one word that throws it off...

kwass has really been hit, as he has has over 100 deleted in the last few days, well asfar as my records show...

~X~

Interesting points there, X. And poor KWAS... oh well.

Also, I think that they should make it that reviews for blammed and delted submissions stay in your profile, but have some indicator that the submission (for example the following text next to the submission name: (BLAMMED)).

It would help for abusive reviews on blammed entries, among other things.

Thoughts?

Wow, you guys are lucky. All of my embarassing 20001-2002 reviews are still there for the whole world to see.

At 10/13/06 08:13 PM, Bezman wrote: Looks like -X- is gonna have the lowest ever 'most reviews written' so congrats on that in advance.

How is that possible when that one dude got 90 more reviews since the last update.

At 10/14/06 11:36 PM, skidfo wrote:

At 10/13/06 08:13 PM, Bezman wrote: Looks like -X- is gonna have the lowest ever 'most reviews written' so congrats on that in advance.

How is that possible when that one dude got 90 more reviews since the last update.

You mean KWAS? He got negative 90 actually.
If it's someone else than nevermind, I didn't check all of them.

At 10/8/06 07:20 PM, Frenzy wrote: Oh, boy, an asterisk next to my name! What's up with that?

Well, two updates ago you should´ve been one rank higher. I fixed the week after so that you got +2, which was enough to make you "most ranked up". But if I hadn´t made that mistake, you wouldn´t have been most ranked up....

At 10/13/06 09:39 PM, Frenzy wrote: Anyway, is anybody esle having the same problem? Because I really hope that I'm not the only one.

Nope, I haven´t lost a single review so far =) Only my first 50 really suck, but none of those were abusive as far as I know.

Anyway here´s the update. Sir-CannabisClock re-enters the list for about the third time, kicking off ThreeStar.

Update #56
1) 15263 +029 XwaynecoltX
2) 13140 -073 KWAS71KCK
3) 04847 -015 MI4-REAL-2001
4) 04660 -004 RyanAn
5) 04358 -017 YoinK
6) 04345 -008 M-A-R-C-U-S
7) 04192 -005 Cyberdevil
8) 03642 -033 MultiGemini
9) 03562 -008 Hamy-jamy
10) 3524 -004 j00bie
11) 2515 +021 milinko959
12) 2386 -016 Violet-AIM
13) 2121 -005 thepromaster
14) 2067 -002 artificial
15) 1935 -028 Evil-C
16) 1930 -012 Compdude
17) 1926 -012 AfroUnderscoreStud
18) 1841 -020 DUDE4U
19) 1831 -009 Bezman
20) 1727 -007 WoebegonenessIsSad
21) 1689 -007 RemRulzz
22) 1589 +000 jonthomson
23) 1551 -027 Iscaryrules
24) 1530 -001 AntiGravity
25) 1443 -005 DevastatoR-da-X
26) 1394 +001 Michelangelo
27) 1368 -001 zeppelinstl2007
28) 1341 -014 angstdrillhead
29) 1333 +002 MegaGold (+1)
30) 1316 -015 ramagi (-1)
31) 1298 -006 Archile
32) 1290 -004 Livecorpse
33) 1219 -005 Frenzy
34) 1219 -001 Dxkpower
35) 1202 -007 TigerChick
36) 1171 -004 SK-media (+1)
37) 1167 -033 bila (-1)
38) 1157 -010 OrgGladiator
39) 1133 +000 Chris-Aldin
40) 1114 -008 Freelance-Magician
41) 1107 -006 MAYORMCHEESE
42) 1091 -002 HeRetiK
43) 1035 -001 kospas
44) 1032 -002 Zouk
45) 1009 -002 GAMECUBICLE
46) 1000 +000 Helloween
47) 0991 -003 Nylo
48) 0979 +000 carmelhadinosaur
49) 0965 -003 RenegadeGirl (+1)
50) 0956 -015 FatherGilpin (-1)

51) 0952 -004 U_Frontin
52) 0931 -004 The-Obsession
53) 0931 -002 Darklilangel23
54) 0911 -001 5ive
55) 0889 -008 wegra2
56) 0889 -005 Daedo-the-Mofo
57) 0882 -005 vdibv
58) 0871 +002 Jeffshaw (+1)
59) 0870 -006 hongkongexpress (-1)
60) 0853 -001 wizardman
61) 0840 -005 Fatblimp23
62) 0838 -004 Starberry
63) 0836 -003 MappytheKlown (+1)
64) 0829 -002 FireHound (+1)
65) 0828 -014 R3dFOx (-2)
66) 0816 -005 RoweNuts
67) 0815 +000 RandomFreak
68) 0807 -004 EZ3
69) 0807 -002 ornery-scotsman
70) 0806 +013 VelvetDarkRocks (+1)
71) 0796 -005 Geminate (-1)
72) 0778 -001 AnzRage (+3)
73) 0777 -004 Havok44 (-1)
74) 0776 -003 Admiral8Q
75) 0771 +004 BMX007 (+1)
76) 0762 -005 rtil (+1)
77) 0756 -024 TheSoulMan (-4)
78) 0751 -001 bumcheekcity
79) 0744 -002 Zamochit-1
80) 0731 -002 SwitchBladeClock
81) 0729 -001 MasterStalker
82) 0727 +091 M14-REAL-2006 (+18)
83) 0718 -001 OCP-Lock (-1)
84) 0710 -002 Hydecka (-1)
85) 0708 -004 Cajunspirit (-1)
86) 0707 -001 Xalyx (-1)
87) 0696 -003 xvllvx (-1)
88) 0694 +000 Ventar
89) 0693 -003 pauliojr (-2)
90) 0685 +000 Dr-Octagon (-1)
91) 0672 -004 UND (-1)
92) 0658 -002 Bowserpants (-1)
93) 0656 -001 doodytheclownfan (-1)
94) 0655 -001 stick0
95) 0655 +??? Sir-CannabisClock (New*)
96) 0653 -003 swive (-3)
97) 0649 -005 RTflash (-2)
98) 0649 -003 gfoxcook (-1)
99) 0648 -005 Credic2 (-3)
100) 641 -001 Tha_Evil_Umpyre (-2)

Most written: M14-REAL-2006
Most lost: KWAS71KCK
Most ranked up: M14-REAL-2006
Most ranked down: TheSoulMan
New: Sir-CannabisClock
Off: ThreeStar

Top 10 this week:
01) +091 | M14-REAL-2006
02) +029 | XwaynecoltX
03) +021 | milinko959
04) +013 | VelvetDarkRocks
05) +004 | BMX007
06) +002 | Jeffshaw
07) +002 | MegaGold
08) +001 | Michelangelo
09) +000 | Dr-Octagon, RandomFreak, carmelhadinosaur, Helloween, Chris-Aldin, jonthomson

Most lost: KWAS71KCK

For Great Justice.

I think I'll start reviewing again. I'm seeing quite a few good submissions and then some that need help but apparently they don't know where. Be it bad taste in music or bad taste in music.

At 10/15/06 06:33 AM, Auz wrote: Update #56

Nice update Auz.

2) 13140 -073 KWAS71KCK

lmao

46) 1000 +000 Helloween

Just the same, but had to write 2 reviews this week.

At 10/15/06 06:35 AM, Auz wrote: Most written: M14-REAL-2006

Congrats to some copycat. lol

Most lost: KWAS71KCK

Yay!

Most ranked up: M14-REAL-2006

Heh.

Top 10 this week:
09) +000 | Dr-Octagon, RandomFreak, carmelhadinosaur, Helloween, Chris-Aldin, jonthomson

That is very silly.

How in the hell was this abusive?

"Well, I'm finally at my 1,000'th review! And I did it on this great flash. It was just great... the big, red 'B'. Everything. Great, StrawberryClock! This is also the first submission I've ever given a 10 to in a review. In 1,000 flashes. Great job!

5/5
.frenZy."

I'm very angry at this whole system. I'm sorry, but cna somebody PLEASE tell me how this was a busive??

Cheers for another update

At 10/15/06 06:35 AM, Auz wrote: 95) 0655 +??? Sir-CannabisClock (New*)
96) 0653 -003 swive (-3)
97) 0649 -005 RTflash (-2)
98) 0649 -003 gfoxcook (-1)
99) 0648 -005 Credic2 (-3)
100) 641 -001 Tha_Evil_Umpyre (-2)

Much movement. Heh.

Most written: M14-REAL-2006

Took me aback. M14 alt? O_.

Most lost: KWAS71KCK

___
6 6
J
V

Most ranked up: M14-REAL-2006
New: Sir-CannabisClock

congrats

Top 10 this week:
01) +091 | M14-REAL-2006
02) +029 | XwaynecoltX
03) +021 | milinko959

good stuff

09) +000 | Dr-Octagon, RandomFreak, carmelhadinosaur, Helloween, Chris-Aldin, jonthomson

heh.

At 10/15/06 08:32 AM, Frenzy wrote: How in the hell was this abusive?

"Well, I'm finally at my 1,000'th review! And I did it on this great flash. It was just great... the big, red 'B'. Everything. Great, StrawberryClock! This is also the first submission I've ever given a 10 to in a review. In 1,000 flashes. Great job!

5/5
.frenZy."

I'm very angry at this whole system. I'm sorry, but cna somebody PLEASE tell me how this was a busive??

Just chalk it up to being too short and arguable violation of rule#2.

That's the only reason I can imagine my 3 were deleted.

Rule 2's very subjective anyway and obviously, some lean towards deletion.

At 10/15/06 06:33 AM, Auz wrote: 15) 1935 -028 Evil-C

He lost a lot which is good news for me since he might end up with less reviews than I have =)

16) 1930 -012 Compdude
17) 1926 -012 AfroUnderscoreStud

Heh we both lost the same amount. Joint 14th for most lost this update.

Most written: M14-REAL-2006

Congrats to M14-REAL-2006 on most written.

Most lost: KWAS71KCK

=)

Most ranked up: M14-REAL-2006

Congrats to M14-REAL-2006 on most ranked up.

New: Sir-CannabisClock

Congrats to him on making it back on the list.

Top 10 this week:

No 10 most lost? =(

09) +000 | Dr-Octagon, RandomFreak, carmelhadinosaur, Helloween, Chris-Aldin, jonthomson

lol 0

Nice update Auz, thanks for taking your time to do it =)

At 10/15/06 08:32 AM, Frenzy wrote: How in the hell was this abusive?

I'm surprised you even have to ask.

"Well, I'm finally at my 1,000'th review! And I did it on this great flash. It was just great... the big, red 'B'. Everything. Great, StrawberryClock! This is also the first submission I've ever given a 10 to in a review. In 1,000 flashes. Great job!

5/5
.frenZy."

The only part of your review about the submission is "It was just great... the big, red 'B'. Everything. Great, StrawberryClock!". That is a completely useless review. Why was it great? What could have been done to improve it? B or not, the review guidelines still apply.

I'm very angry at this whole system. I'm sorry, but cna somebody PLEASE tell me how this was a busive??

Review guidelines.

3 things:
I only got -1? Sweet, would've guessed worse. Well, next weekend I'm really going to tear up some reviews (about 25 or so only, but i'll take it).
KWAS got that many deleted? YAY!
And what's with MI4 with a new account? Time to check all those reviews to make sure none are abusive.

Oh shit, 4 ranks downs this week! Well, I haven't reviewed a lot, even less than other weeks, and with the massive flash deletion I've lost around 30 reviews. So I'll take it like a man :P

At 10/15/06 06:33 AM, Auz wrote: 10) 3524 -004 j00bie
11) 2515 +021 milinko959

I cannot believe that he isn't losing more than that :(

i dont under stand what this meant.

At 10/15/06 01:30 PM, ssjmg wrote: i dont under stand what this meant.

It's a list of the people with the most reviews out of everyone on Newgrounds.

41) 1107 -006 MAYORMCHEESE

I wanna cry.

I've got a whole day off today, so I'm thinking of reviewing a couple Flashes. What are some good Flashes to watch? I'm a bit out of the loop when it comes to 'what's cool' on NG.

At 10/15/06 04:30 PM, MAYORMCHEESE wrote: I've got a whole day off today, so I'm thinking of reviewing a couple Flashes. What are some good Flashes to watch? I'm a bit out of the loop when it comes to 'what's cool' on NG.

I suggest you give the harryjarry: ATWI80G series a good look.

While ATWI80D is also an entertaining series as well.

Have fun reviewing!

At 10/15/06 06:35 AM, Auz wrote: 51) 0952 -004 U_Frontin

It's kinda crazy that the top 50 reviewers are nearing 1000+...

94) 0655 -001 stick0
95) 0655 +??? Sir-CannabisClock (New*)
96) 0653 -003 swive (-3)
97) 0649 -005 RTflash (-2)
98) 0649 -003 gfoxcook (-1)
99) 0648 -005 Credic2 (-3)
100) 641 -001 Tha_Evil_Umpyre (-2)

I got to 654 months ago. I have re-reviewed at least 6 movies to get BACK to 654 after review deletions (due to old submissions being removed for whatever reason, nothing wrong with my reviews)... on at least THREE occasions.

Yet I fell to 653 and then 652 a month ago... then down to 650 a couple weeks ago (which at least is a good number)... and now to an ugly uneven number like 649. That's at least 11 reviews I've lost since I first got to 654.

I suppose I have three choices:

A) Give up and just stop trying to stay at cool review counts all the time.
B) Review my way back up to 654 like I usually do, all stubborn-like.
C) Actually review beyond 654... maybe up to 660 or 666, the next cool numbers coming up.

Regarding C: I did leave 642 behind at some point, after all, even though I really like 642. TEH MARCH GOES ON.

Most written: M14-REAL-2006
Most lost: KWAS71KCK
Most ranked up: M14-REAL-2006
Most ranked down: TheSoulMan
New: Sir-CannabisClock
Off: ThreeStar

Nifty list stats.

Great updates, Auz. I'm not around often enough to say it as much as it should be said, but trust me that I enjoy these updates despite not being a very steady reviewer (or poster, for that matter). #;-}>

At 10/15/06 06:33 AM, Auz wrote: 49) 0965 -003 RenegadeGirl (+1)

Maybe it's time for me to review, before I fall from the top 50.

At 10/13/06 09:39 PM, Frenzy wrote: What with all the review deletion, homework, tests, and the FAQ/Walkthrough I'm currently writing, I'm really getting sick of reviewing. It seems that I review a movie, another review gets deleted... to be quite frank, it really, really sucks, and I hope that they change the system when the new stuff arrives.

Are all of your reviews being deleted by mods, or are they being deleted due to old submissions being zapped?

My reviews drop away at least once a month, if not more often, and it's all the latter for me.

I can only imagine how much suck it is if you experience both types of review deletion, though you only have yourself to blame for the former, anyway.

Anyway, is anybody esle having the same problem? Because I really hope that I'm not the only one.

Of course you're not.

At 10/13/06 11:47 PM, wizardman wrote: Just got a first e-mail regarding a review deletion
One of my earlier 1-liners in the April 2000 flashes. Most of those were awful, so I don't mind redoing them.

E-mail? I thought PMs were sent out, not e-mails.

I just wish I had PMs for all the reviews of mine I've lost, so I'd know which movies from 2000-2004 were deleted that my ancient reviews died along with. So look at this way, guys, at least when mods delete your reviews now, you KNOW what happened. Far better than never knowing and just watching your count drop and wondering if it was one of your fave movies from years ago that just died and took a review of yours along with it... whether the flash was proven to be stolen, or whether the author just decided he wanted it off NG and deleted it and asked Wade to remove it... wondering WTF happened, IOW, in a futile sort of way that doesn't merit any time wasting...

Yet I've fallen to the temptation at least twice to go back and find out what the hell it was that I lost. But it's hard to pin it down. I've only figured it out ONCE or TWICE in my whole 3+ years of reviewing... and once was back when I had less than 100 reviews, so at least it was easier to figure out back then.

At 10/14/06 03:17 PM, Frenzy wrote: Interesting points there, X. And poor KWAS... oh well.

That may be the only time anyone's said poor KWAS in this (or the old review list) thread. Wowza.

Also, I think that they should make it that reviews for blammed and delted submissions stay in your profile, but have some indicator that the submission (for example the following text next to the submission name: (BLAMMED)).

That's be great. But just keep in mind, if you're hoping it would raise your review total and rank a lot, it would do the same thing for a lot of other people.

I can guarantee you I'd have over 800 reviews, instead of around 650, for one thing, if all blammed movies I've reviewed didn't take my reviews with them.

At 10/15/06 08:32 AM, Frenzy wrote: How in the hell was this abusive?

"Well, I'm finally at my 1,000'th review! And I did it on this great flash. It was just great... the big, red 'B'. Everything. Great, StrawberryClock! This is also the first submission I've ever given a 10 to in a review. In 1,000 flashes. Great job!

5/5
.frenZy."

I'm very angry at this whole system. I'm sorry, but cna somebody PLEASE tell me how this was a busive??

Half of your review is about yourself.

That's not abusive, really, but it is pointless. Pimping your stats in posts on the BBS is frowned upon somewhat. In reviews? It's insanely frowned upon. Reviews aren't the place to be saying you have 1000 reviews. Do that in this thread or over in level up!

And if you really have to say "HEY, 1000!" (because trust me, I probably did the same thing when I finally hit 500), then make sure you have a good long review to go along with it. Not just one line in between you talking about that pretty, shiny 1000 number.

Don't be angry about it, just REDO the review and stop complaining, eh? You could have been banned along with the deletion, so consider yourself lucky.

yeah, I meant PM gfoxcook. I little mus-up there.

I'e gotten 4 total, and I actually wouldn't consider most of them abusive.I don't say "it sucks" or it's crap" or anything in them, but they're deleted anyway. How do you write a constructive review if the flash is just text?

At 10/15/06 11:32 AM, AfroUnderscoreStud wrote: The only part of your review about the submission is "It was just great... the big, red 'B'. Everything. Great, StrawberryClock!". That is a completely useless review. Why was it great? What could have been done to improve it? B or not, the review guidelines still apply.

But there was nothing it HAD TO have been improved on. I mean, come on, it's 'B'! Besides, tehre are lots of worse review out there.

I'm very angry at this whole system. I'm sorry, but cna somebody PLEASE tell me how this was a busive??

Review guidelines.

I've read them before.