Whoaaa

Big congrats to -CANAS- for becoming BBS MOD, notbad, i hope you will bring some quality to the moding team, i hope you dont change like others have though...

But congrats on the new modship...

~X~

At 11/6/05 03:37 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Big congrats to -CANAS- for becoming BBS MOD, notbad, i hope you will bring some quality to the moding team, i hope you dont change like others have though...

Congrats to him. Gooch and some other people got modded as well. Nice. Congrats to all that became a mod.

At 11/6/05 03:37 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: i hope you dont change like others have though...

Lets hope Canas and Gooch become the people's mods.

Man, I should really go back to my 5 reviews a day system

Yes lets hope they do become the peoples mods, but like 90% of the mods they do fall to the crazy general like-ness...

It will also be sad to see that -Canas- will not review as much do to his new duties as his reviews were very good and always made for some good debates on reviews, on the other hand he may be more into review banning which is another good thing....

~X~

huh, i guess i'm not too far off being on this list.

At 11/7/05 01:43 AM, rtil wrote: huh, i guess i'm not too far off being on this list.

455 reviews. That isn't too far away unless you make a few amount of reviews a day.

Hmm, I guess I should be in the top 100 reviews tomorrow. *waits for Auz's next update*

I did abit of reviewing tonight, i was like in the mood for it and some yesterday, so i supose things are picking up abit more, how about everyone else?

~X~

Update #11, part 1

# Reviews/Change/Alias<p>
1) 12705 +124 XwaynecoltX
2) 11627 +179 KWAS71KCK
3) 04642 +000 MI4_REAL_2001
4) 04471 +004 RyanAn
5) 04405 -001 M-A-R-C-U-S
6) 04282 -002 Cyberdevil
7) 04175 -001 YoinK_VineS
8) 03627 -008 j00bie
9) 02993 +066 X-Naut
10) 2490 +000 Hamy_jamy
11) 2452 -001 Violet-AIM
12) 2166 +000 thepromaster
13) 2074 +000 artificial
14) 2047 +000 EVIL-C
15) 2004 +010 Afro_Stud
16) 1971 -001 Compdude
17) 1917 +000 DUDE4U
18) 1691 +014 Seizure_Dog
19) 1599 +000 jonthomson
20) 1554 +000 AntiGravity
21) 1475 +000 DevastatoR_da_X
22) 1463 +000 Bezman
23) 1395 +000 zackdaman03
24) 1394 +000 angstdrillhead
25) 1376 +020 iscRulz
26) 1328 +000 Livecorpse
27) 1249 +000 Dxkpower
28) 1230 +017 -Mj (+1)
29) 1226 +000 Tiger_Chick (-1)
30) 1182 +000 OrgGladiator
31) 1158 -001 Archile
32) 1105 +000 HeRetiK
33) 1075 +006 ramagi
34) 1057 +000 kospas
35) 1042 +068 RemRulzz (+4)
36) 1005 +015 bila (+1)
37) 0998 +001 Nylo (-2)
38) 0993 +000 carmelhadinosaur (-2)
39) 0989 +016 ShinKosai (+1)
40) 0984 +000 FatherGilpin (-2)
41) 0971 +006 Chris_Aldin
42) 0960 +000 Dizfunktion
43) 0945 +001 The_Obsession
44) 0932 +003 Darklilangel
45) 0920 +000 Novocane
46) 0903 +000 vdibv
47) 0882 +004 Mizz_Caramba
48) 0871 +000 Daedo_The_Mofo
49) 0866 +000 MappyTheKlown
50) 0845 +005 GAMECUBICLE (+4)

At 11/8/05 10:08 AM, Auz wrote: Update #11, part 1

and part 2:

51) 0844 +000 FireHound (-1)
52) 0841 +000 RandomFreak (-1)
53) 0841 +000 RoweNuts (-1)
54) 0839 -001 Fatblimp23 (-1)
55) 0819 +004 wegra2
56) 0813 +000 EZ3
57) 0803 +000 AnzRage
58) 0801 +000 Havok44
59) 0773 +000 ornery_scotsman
60) 0766 +000 bumcheekcity
61) 0763 +005 Jeffshaw (+1)
62) 0759 +000 Zamochit- (-1)
63) 0759 +078 MegaGold (+12)
64) 0746 +000 Admiral8Q (-1)
65) 0742 +002 MasterStalker (-1)
66) 0721 +000 AncientX (-1)
67) 0713 +000 pauliojr (-1)
68) 0709 +000 xvllvx (-1)
69) 0707 +003 -Canas- (-1)
70) 0700 +000 Ventar (-1)
71) 0697 +003 Hydecka (-1)
72) 0696 +006 SwitchBladeClock (-1)
73) 0684 +017 R3dF0x (+5)
74) 0683 +000 Bowserpants (-2)
75) 0683 +000 UND (-2)
76) 0683 +003 Geminate
77) 0681 +000 RTFlash (-3)
78) 0667 -001 stick0 (-1)
79) 0666 +000 swive
80) 0663 +000 doodytheclownfan
81) 0642 +000 gfoxcook
82) 0638 +000 PepsiClock
83) 0637 +000 Tha_Evil_Umpyre
84) 0625 +005 Pink_Floyd (+1)
85) 0623 +004 jetninjin (+1)
86) 0622 +000 Klacid (-2)
87) 0620 +000 -Dawkins- (-1)
88) 0618 +000 Umsutfeersme
89) 0617 +008 cannibus_clock (+2)
90) 0615 +000 pickmeup (-1)
93) 0614 +006 Credic2 (+2)
91) 0609 -001 Master_Inuyasha (-2)
92) 0608 +000 crackakillin (-1)
94) 0606 +000 Beowulf_Hawk
95) 0603 +000 NasFlash
96) 0601 +000 ZombieLennon
97) 0600 +000 HardJudge
98) 0570 +--- Bahamut7 (New)
99) 0596 +000 agak12 (-1)
100) 0595 +000 tabitha123 (-1)

Most reviews written: KWAS
Most reviews lost: j00bie
Most ranked up: MegaGold (I think that was the biggest rank up ever)
Most ranked down: RTFlash
Newcomers: Bahamut7
Kicked off: dw817

Congrats to:
Afro_Stud, passing 2000 reviews
bila and RemRulzz, passing 1000 reviews
GAMECUBICLE, entering top 50

At 11/8/05 10:08 AM, Auz wrote: Update #11, part 1

Great update Auz!

At 11/8/05 10:19 AM, Auz wrote: 98) 0570 +--- Bahamut7 (New)

Um, 598 reviews, not 570. :P

Most ranked up: MegaGold (I think that was the biggest rank up ever)

Congrats to him.

Newcomers: Bahamut7

Welcome to me.

Kicked off: dw817

Sorry. :(

At 11/8/05 10:46 AM, Bahamut7 wrote: Um, 598 reviews, not 570. :P

My apologies, how it should have been (tabitha also had +003, not +000):

96) 0601 +000 ZombieLennon
97) 0600 +000 HardJudge
98) 0598 +??? Bahamut7 (New)
99) 0596 +000 agak12 (-1)
100) 0595 +003 tabitha123 (-1)

Well it's probably clear now that your review change was 28 =) (and your rank-up was +9)

By the way, didn't you pass 600 yesterday or the day before?

At 11/8/05 10:19 AM, Auz wrote: Most reviews written: KWAS

Congrats to KWAS71KCK on most reviews written since the last update.

Now please write actual reviews from now on rather than one liners, a few of them are actually beginning to become reviews as opposed to a brief comment, but they're still not good enough, especially for someone with as many reviews as you.

Most ranked up: MegaGold

Congrats to MegaGold on most ranked up

(I think that was the biggest rank up ever)

Technically that would be either:

-Canas- upon entering the list or,

chrisjericho(my old alias) upon entering the list.

But yeah, definitely the biggest rankup that you knew the number for on this list, congrats to him.

Newcomers: Bahamut7

Well what do you know, you finally made the list, congrats Bahamut7

Congrats to:
Afro_Stud, passing 2000 reviews

Congrats to Afro_Stud on passing 2000 reviews(I wonder how long it will take me to reach 3000. Maybe a year or so)

bila and RemRulzz, passing 1000 reviews

Congrats to bila and RemRulzz for reaching 4 digits.

GAMECUBICLE, entering top 50

Congrats to GAMECUBICLE, for entering the top 50, now for the top 10.

As always a special thanks to Auz for creating the list.

Regarding me changing my sig to say my responses list has been updated, in order to do that I'd have to delete something from my sig as I don't have enough characters left to include it. And there's nothing I want to delete in my sig, there's also nothing I want to shorten, so I'll just have to leave it the way it is.

At 11/8/05 11:48 AM, Auz wrote: 98) 0598 +??? Bahamut7 (New)

Let's see how well I'll do until next update.

By the way, didn't you pass 600 yesterday or the day before?

I just got 600 reviews now. I got too lazy and didn't reach it earlier. :S

At 11/8/05 12:21 PM, Afro_Stud wrote: Now please write actual reviews from now on rather than one liners, a few of them are actually beginning to become reviews as opposed to a brief comment, but they're still not good enough, especially for someone with as many reviews as you.

True, but I did see around a seven liner review from him. O__o I think it was for the eBaum flash.

Well what do you know, you finally made the list, congrats Bahamut7

Yep, I finally made it. Thanks Afro!

Kwass hehe

Ya he was busy this week, ill be sure to be busy this coming week he that crazzy Kwass, anwyasy nice update and congrats to all the rest of you peoples...

~X~

Knowing that I won top ranked 2nd time in a row and what he says might be the biggest rank up ever makes me so happy. Woo hoo!

At 11/8/05 10:08 AM, Auz wrote: Update #11, part 1

9) 02993 +066 X-Naut

So close to 3k before the update,oh well great update Auz and congrats to Megagold for his huge rank up. =)

At 11/8/05 07:22 PM, -Canas- wrote:
Now, if you actually tried reviewing the movies instead of typing two sentences of crap, you might actually feel liked you accomplished something.

If only..

I looked and almost all of them are over 7 sentences. Check yourself, also over 5 lines. Not Canas, stop being self centered of how I passed you and from before, I love reviewing that is why my reviews are getting high. I honestly don't care if I won the most ranked or not. I'm just happy to have won it, and to know that the people reading the review I gave them satisfied. Read a couple and youll notice how they said thanks thanks for giving me an honest opinionized( I think I made that up) review. Now can you please give me a break and leave me alone.

MegaGold wrote
I looked and almost all of them are over 7 sentences.
I love reviewing that is why my reviews are getting high.

Hey MG 7 lines is better then most i wouldnt worry about anything hell i wish i could do 7 lines, i just dont like to show off with extra crap that is not needed or boasting about the flash when 3-5 line reviews are just enough to HELP, and comment on what the artist did good or bad on the flash...

But ya i love reviewing myself, sometimes it depends if im in the mood or not but flash is cool, and if you can help thats great, anyways congrats on the recent movie reviewing...

~X~

At 11/9/05 09:46 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote:

Hey MG 7 lines is better then most i wouldnt worry about anything hell i wish i could do 7 lines, i just dont like to show off with extra crap that is not needed or boasting about the flash when 3-5 line reviews are just enough to HELP, and comment on what the artist did good or bad on the flash...

But ya i love reviewing myself, sometimes it depends if im in the mood or not but flash is cool, and if you can help thats great, anyways congrats on the recent movie reviewing...

~X~

Honestly I use to only make 2 lines. That was about 100 reviews back. The person that switched my mind on the idea on reviews was my sister and the person who is now making me want to perfect the even more is Canas. The thing I really want most is to make it in the top 10 of all reviewers some day. But going back to my bad habit of short reviews, I stopped that. I don't want to be overater like KWAS71 what ever, I can't speek his name. Hope you best on reviews.(:

Wow i have not had much time for posting last day or so, reviewing has taken up alot of my time recently, i have really been in the mood, so it must be good....

View Your Reviews (12,806)
(With Responses Only (1,733))

~X~

At 11/10/05 06:21 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Wow i have not had much time for posting last day or so, reviewing has taken up alot of my time recently, i have really been in the mood, so it must be good....

View Your Reviews (12,806)
(With Responses Only (1,733))

~X~

Awesome, mine at the moment

View Your Reviews (779)
(With Responses Only (147))

At 11/11/05 12:10 AM, MegaGold wrote:

At 11/10/05 06:21 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Wow i have not had much time for posting last day or so, reviewing has taken up alot of my time recently, i have really been in the mood, so it must be good....

View Your Reviews (12,806)
(With Responses Only (1,733))

~X~

Awesome, mine at the moment

View Your Reviews (779)
(With Responses Only (147))

Damn I am not even close

View Your Reviews (41)
(With Responses Only (11))

Hit 400 reviews a few minutes ago

with the holidays coming up I shall be up there on the list with you beautiful shining stars.

At 11/8/05 12:21 PM, Afro_Stud wrote:
Regarding me changing my sig to say my responses list has been updated, in order to do that I'd have to delete something from my sig as I don't have enough characters left to include it. And there's nothing I want to delete in my sig, there's also nothing I want to shorten, so I'll just have to leave it the way it is.

You could change the message from 'The Top 100 Responses List' to 'Top 100 Responses List v2' and change the number each time.

At 11/9/05 07:54 PM, -Canas- wrote:

At 11/9/05 07:47 PM, MegaGold wrote: <stuff>

<stuff>

Just wanted to say - yeah. As a flash author (though not recently - too busy drawing and painting to animate or code) I do prefer longer reviews. Though it's not so much the length I care about as it is getting down to specifics.

For the record, I'm always really glad to get reviewed by AfroStud as he lays it on the line and tells it all like it is. I rate him highly as a reviewer.

Imo, the ideal review should give an overall indication of the movie, suggest at least one point that could be improved/the weakest point (to help the author improve) and point out at least one nice thing (so the author doesn't start feeling it's all bad). Personally though, I'd much rather get a 3 line review pointing out a couple of bad points than a massive one raving on about it. Generally speaking.

Now, for the next 4 minutes, I shall review some reviews.

((( VERY COOL ))) November 4, 2003
Reviewed by: XwaynecoltX

Overall Score: 7
That was very cool, great music, and i just love the backround effects like the stars, and they they didnt just blink fast or anything they acted like real stars inwhich gave the music video a real nice feel to it, great music aswell...

MOVIE COMMENTARY: A great music video with cool effects...

~X~

Graphics: 6 Sound: 4 Interactivity: 3 Style: 6 Violence: 0 Humor: 1"

nice review. You mentioned a specific point, which shows me that you aren't just talking shit and actually put some thought into your words. I never understood your ((( )))s, but it's nice decoration, I suppose.

HAHAHHAHA December 20, 2001
Reviewed by: kittyslasher

Overall Score: 0
no that wasn't funny, even if it was funny, I didn't have the time nor wanton to read the scribbly text, and click on it, who knows maybe this movie is good. I just didn't see it.

Graphics: 0 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 0 Style: 0 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

In hindsight, the review makes a valid point. And it's useful in that regard. But the sarcastic tone of the writing? Totally unneeded.

hmm that was sorta bad August 23, 2003
Reviewed by: treesunited

Overall Score: 1
but in ur first try by frame.. it pretty good
... i mean i liked it
blast you apple man!!!

Graphics: 2 Sound: 2 Interactivity: 0 Style: 2 Violence: 2 Humor: 0

Now here's a reviewer who's a bit confused. He likes it yet gives it 1? (Note: I'm not disputing the score. Just the contradicting statements.) And it really offers nothing constructive in any way.

Its a good start. July 9, 2003
Reviewed by: blix797

Overall Score: 4
give this an intro, mabye some sound, and an instructions screen, and this would be a kewl game.

ps my high score is 567

Graphics: 4 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 10 Style: 7 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

This review shows even short reviews can be great. Multiple suggestions, positivity, a bit of banter, scores with thought put into them, this review has it all.

Nice Original Game!! July 14, 2003
Reviewed by: carmelhadinosaur

Overall Score: 8
But the ball is slowing down.

Graphics: 8 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 10 Style: 9 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

This might have been a valid point. Almost ridiculously short, yet poetic in its potency. However, that is until you realise that the point was addressed in the game itself. Still, it's the thought that counts.

At 11/11/05 08:24 AM, Bezman wrote: You could change the message from 'The Top 100 Responses List' to 'Top 100 Responses List v2' and change the number each time.

I toyed around with some stuff and I wasn't too keen on the change in appearance, I'll probably just leave my sig as it is for the time being.

At 11/11/05 09:10 AM, Bezman wrote: For the record, I'm always really glad to get reviewed by AfroStud as he lays it on the line and tells it all like it is. I rate him highly as a reviewer.

Aw shucks, thanks *Blushes*

I still have to get round to reviewing Go Godzilla Go! Collab. I'll probably do that some time during the next few weeks.

HAHAHHAHA December 20, 2001
Reviewed by: kittyslasher

Overall Score: 0
no that wasn't funny, even if it was funny, I didn't have the time nor wanton to read the scribbly text, and click on it, who knows maybe this movie is good. I just didn't see it.

Graphics: 0 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 0 Style: 0 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

In hindsight, the review makes a valid point. And it's useful in that regard. But the sarcastic tone of the writing? Totally unneeded.

Seconded, the sarcastic tone was totally un-needed, he didn't even watch the movie, it pisses me off when people review something that they haven't even watched, since how are you supposed to comment on something you haven't even seen?

hmm that was sorta bad August 23, 2003
Reviewed by: treesunited

Overall Score: 1
but in ur first try by frame.. it pretty good
... i mean i liked it
blast you apple man!!!

Graphics: 2 Sound: 2 Interactivity: 0 Style: 2 Violence: 2 Humor: 0

Now here's a reviewer who's a bit confused. He likes it yet gives it 1? (Note: I'm not disputing the score. Just the contradicting statements.) And it really offers nothing constructive in any way.

Heh, that's what about 20-30% of the reviews are like by people on this site, just utter crap. As for giving low scores and saying they liked it, well that's like someone else we know ;P

Its a good start. July 9, 2003
Reviewed by: blix797

Overall Score: 4
give this an intro, mabye some sound, and an instructions screen, and this would be a kewl game.

ps my high score is 567

Graphics: 4 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 10 Style: 7 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

This review shows even short reviews can be great. Multiple suggestions, positivity, a bit of banter, scores with thought put into them, this review has it all.

Heh, that is a good review compared to the rest of that length,

Nice Original Game!! July 14, 2003
Reviewed by: carmelhadinosaur

Overall Score: 8
But the ball is slowing down.

Graphics: 8 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 10 Style: 9 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

This might have been a valid point. Almost ridiculously short, yet poetic in its potency. However, that is until you realise that the point was addressed in the game itself. Still, it's the thought that counts.

That has to be one of the most pointless reviews I've ever seen o.O

Anyway Bez, you should check out The Reviewer's Club sometime, maybe.

At 11/11/05 09:10 AM, Bezman wrote: Now, for the next 4 minutes, I shall review some reviews.

HAHAHHAHA December 20, 2001
Reviewed by: kittyslasher
Overall Score: 0
no that wasn't funny, even if it was funny, I didn't have the time nor wanton to read the scribbly text, and click on it, who knows maybe this movie is good. I just didn't see it.

Graphics: 0 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 0 Style: 0 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

In hindsight, the review makes a valid point. And it's useful in that regard. But the sarcastic tone of the writing? Totally unneeded.

Well if I was a flash author and I got an all 0´s review, then I don´t think I would take him seriously since he probably didn´t took the time to take a good look at your flash and just wanted to review for his review count. This guy even admits it himself. He just said it wasn´t funny, well that´s something that´s very hard to improve since everybody has his own sense of humor so I would rate this review almost useless.

hmm that was sorta bad August 23, 2003
Reviewed by: treesunited
Overall Score: 1
but in ur first try by frame.. it pretty good
... i mean i liked it
blast you apple man!!!

Graphics: 2 Sound: 2 Interactivity: 0 Style: 2 Violence: 2 Humor: 0

Now here's a reviewer who's a bit confused. He likes it yet gives it 1? (Note: I'm not disputing the score. Just the contradicting statements.) And it really offers nothing constructive in any way.

I agree with him being confused, I see more people like that who say that they like it and yet they give it a very low score. He should put a bit more thought in his reviews.

Its a good start. July 9, 2003
Reviewed by: blix797
Overall Score: 4
give this an intro, mabye some sound, and an instructions screen, and this would be a kewl game.
ps my high score is 567

Graphics: 4 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 10 Style: 7 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

This review shows even short reviews can be great. Multiple suggestions, positivity, a bit of banter, scores with thought put into them, this review has it all.

This review was better indeed. Gives a couple of ideas, although I think he should´ve made it a bit longer and he should be a bit more specific (or whatever you call that).

Nice Original Game!! July 14, 2003
Reviewed by: carmelhadinosaur

Overall Score: 8
But the ball is slowing down.

Graphics: 8 Sound: 0 Interactivity: 10 Style: 9 Violence: 0 Humor: 0

This might have been a valid point. Almost ridiculously short, yet poetic in its potency. However, that is until you realise that the point was addressed in the game itself. Still, it's the thought that counts.

A bit of a shame for a guy with nearly 1000 reviews. He should be an example, but this review is pretty bad in my opinion. It´s just too short, I can´t say he put a lot of time in his reviews. He did gave a good point though, that´s the only possitive thing about this review.

I just felt like giving my opinion on those reviews as well =)

I remember at one point that wade said not to give all 0's becuae there are some efforts that the artist does do...

As for Carmels reviews they are ok, it also depends on what the movie was about he could have just aggreeing with what was said in the movie, from a point of someone just looking at a review and getting confused i can see how people with make there opinions of it...

~~X~

i need to start reviewing more ...

At 11/11/05 03:24 PM, JJ4eva wrote: i need to start reviewing more ...

Well, first thing you need to do is make your reviews a bit longer. They're not badThey don't have to be paragraphs (even though they're nice), but 3 or 4 secntences usually does the trick. Also, don't review for the sole purpose of getting on the list, or else a lot of yours will end up deleted anyway, It's nice to see new people that want to contribute, though. If you're not sure how to make them longer, use many of the top 100 list people as a guide (except KWAS)