At 3/20/05 03:34 AM, C_A wrote:
Just hit 13, and my gift was my removal of priviliges to review! Joy!
Congrats on the level 13ness.
2) Said "TWEET TWEET" a lot in a flash movie that was blatantly stolen and promptly deleted. Marvelous.
BTW, I should add to my above post that detailed the reasons you were banned (NEVER ever complain when you actually deserved the ban, BTW), that those TWO movies (not one) that you posted TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET TWEET .... etc. etc. etc. to... WERE NOT YET DELETED.
Both of them are MARKED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW. That's not the same thing. That means admins can access them, but mods and normal users can't. It also means that your reviews for those movies are STILL IN YOUR REVIEW LISTING, which you would have realised if you ever bothered to check your own review listing (click reviews in your profile)... from the fact that you think the movies were deleted, I gather that you do not. Both reviews are on your FIRST PAGE of reviews.
And were visible to you, me, and everyone before I banned you. Now they're only visible to mods and admins.
Shame on you for thinking that a flash being stolen is reason for spamming up multiple reviews, BTW. Nowhere in the review rules does it say "FEEL FREE TO BE ABUSIVE IF THE MOVIE DESERVES IT DUE TO BEING STOLEN!!!!!" NOWHERE.
At 3/20/05 02:49 PM, C_A wrote:
Hey, not my fault. Some people can abuse the system. Wolvie used to do that with my reviews. He flagged 'em abusive once a day for 12 days until all my reviews from his crud games were removed.
... HEY, NOT MY FAULT?! Did he seriously just say that, people?
Guess what. YOU ABUSED THE SYSTEM, too. Stop complaining about people marking your reviews. I didn't ban you because normal users marked your reviews abusive (and BTW, guess what? That doesn't do SHIT. It just brings those reviews to mods/admins' attention... if they're NOT ABUSIVE, they DON'T GET DELETED or GET YOU BANNED. Only YOU do that to yourself).
Also, your tweet tweet spam reviews are like 0/2 (one of the abusive markings is from me, in the mod panel, 10x strength). They aren't 0/50 or something. Stop whining and take your well-earned punishment like a man or I'll ban you from the BBS for COMPLAINING ABOUT MODERATION, which is ANOTHER well-established rule you apparently haven't heard of, just like the rule not to SPAM UP THE REVIEWS like you did.
For shame. Such an early signup date yet such a foolish attitude.
......
All righty now... let's move on.
At 3/19/05 11:39 PM, Iscrulz wrote:
At 3/19/05 09:16 PM, phiieeguy_aka_Kiba wrote:
And I also noticed I passed 3,300 posts. ^_^ No screenie needed since it is merely a "mini-milestone" I guess I'll call it a "meterstone". :o
Make sure you screen shot 4,321 and of course 3,333.
I got this just recently. Really close.
Yeah, 3333 is much more important than 3300. I still can't believe I missed Dogma's 3333 after snagging both her 1111 and 2222! Arghle. #;-}>
4321 is great (and I'm going to hit 54321 b/p in a few more weeks, that'll be nifty).
And as for YOUR screenie (4059 posts / 4.059 ppd)... I LOVE it when stuff like that happens. I think it's only happened once (that I've noticed) on my account. Or maybe twice, I can't remember.
A few OTHER times, though, I'd get an interesting variation on it. Exact same numbers, but different order. eg: 7234 posts / 4.732 ppd... or something like that.
At 3/20/05 12:49 AM, phileeguy wrote:
My doppleganger is pretty much correct. I am from Philadelphia, which would make me a "Philly guy," but my first name is also Lee, so I just stuck it in there instead of the "ly."
Oh and to make this stat related, I'll congratulate myself for passing 11,111 blams even though I am without a screeny. And congratulations to all the others who have made it to milestones.
Congrats on passing 11,111 (and on the same night your "doppleganger" passed 11,000, too!).
So that explains the lee. You mean you put the "lee" in there instead of the "lly," though, not just the "ly," because if you'd just swapped out lee for ly, your name would be philleeguy (with two L's). Always wondered about that.
...
anyway, congrats to everyone else on the cool things as well.