At 8/31/04 09:10 PM, D0GMA wrote: Recon needs to go on more binges and Joe, Crono-, and Ryo need to stay disinterested ^^

Or maybe you should just start BPing more, you slacker =D

At 8/31/04 09:12 PM, j00bie wrote:

At 8/31/04 09:10 PM, D0GMA wrote: Recon needs to go on more binges and Joe, Crono-, and Ryo need to stay disinterested ^^

Or maybe you should just start BPing more, you slacker =D

~piffle~ ... I'm doing 120/day as of yesterday ... had too much crap to do today, so I've "only" got 50 since the recalc this morning.

At 8/31/04 09:15 PM, D0GMA wrote: had too much crap to do today, so I've "only" got 50 since the recalc this morning.

Thanks for having too much crap to do today, that probably put me back on top. heh

On another note, I just hit 17,000 blams and should get my 6,000th save Friday.

Congrats on the firts 1000 Delteated. Oh and i just osted the most embarrasing topic in my life in General, feel free to flam guys.

At 8/31/04 09:31 PM, MPA wrote:
Thanks for having too much crap to do today, that probably put me back on top. heh

Earned since the update, aiming on gold going into today:

MPA 429
IAmNone 420
Ya_Ya 412
D0GMA 411
RoweNutes 383
Syme 354

With the slacking I did on Saturday (only got 60), and too much time spent afk today, I don't think I'm making red this week. Guess I have to postpone my go on it until next. 900 on the week is still within reach but I'll probably settle at 800 ... either way I'm likely to continue to stop on 00 ... makes it soooo much easier to work things out for the next week.

On another note, I just hit 17,000 blams and should get my 6,000th save Friday.

Grats and good luck. The "special mentions" I've started to do on the Top 50 announcements are just for 5k splits, but you've been putting pretty heavy dents in what you need to get to 10k by tri-gold every week =)

At 8/31/04 09:42 PM, D0GMA wrote: but you've been putting pretty heavy dents in what you need to get to 10k by tri-gold every week =)

SHB but you've been putting pretty heavy dents in what you need to get to 10k and 20k by tri-gold every week =)

At 8/31/04 08:00 PM, D0GMA wrote: Grammar my dear, grammar. It's I would still rather know who Recon's alts are.

Who the hell needs an alt anyway?

At 8/31/04 09:42 PM, D0GMA wrote:
MPA 429
IAmNone 420
Ya_Ya 412
D0GMA 411
RoweNutes 383
Syme 354

I guess this IAmNone guy is serious about getting b/p's. He's not claiming the crown again though. I still like how he said there's no way he's getting that many, trying to sneak in on us.

At 8/31/04 09:51 PM, D0GMA wrote: SHB but you've been putting pretty heavy dents in what you need to get to 10k and 20k by tri-gold every week =)

Heh yeah, I like your tri-gold better than my 3xG.

At 8/31/04 10:46 PM, BonusStage wrote: Yeah j00bie changed his for the days i was supposed to deposit, and i won't say what this password was, in the case he way want to use it again, but it was very humorous for one thing :)

My password is a funny one, and it still is the same one since last time you deposited for me... it always has been.

At 8/31/04 10:46 PM, BonusStage wrote:

At 8/31/04 09:31 PM, MPA wrote: On another note, I just hit 17,000 blams and should get my 6,000th save Friday.

they just keep wracking up don't they heh, and woah i just realized that i got my 7000th blam, ahem 40 blams ago :\

I'm on my way towards getting 3000 blams and 1000 saves at the same time (I've got 2476 blams and 819 saves now). I'll see if I can control my blams and saves to get them to coincide. Of course, then it'll be a triple celebration: blam benchmark, save benchmark, and a new rank! :-D

At 8/31/04 10:52 PM, ShittyKitty wrote: Of course, then it'll be a triple celebration: blam benchmark, save benchmark, and a new rank! :-D

COPIER!!! I did that a while back, but deleted my picture.
Except mine WASNT a coincedince =D
i could probably dig it up if I tried.

At 8/31/04 10:58 PM, j00bie wrote:

At 8/31/04 10:52 PM, ShittyKitty wrote: Of course, then it'll be a triple celebration: blam benchmark, save benchmark, and a new rank! :-D

COPIER!!! I did that a while back, but deleted my picture.
Except mine WASNT a coincedince =D
i could probably dig it up if I tried.

Nuh-uh nuh-uh nuh-uh! I thought of it all by myself. :-p Besides, I wasn't here for that; I just started being active in the BBS a couple of weeks ago.

At 8/31/04 11:00 PM, ShittyKitty wrote: Nuh-uh nuh-uh nuh-uh! I thought of it all by myself. :-p Besides, I wasn't here for that; I just started being active in the BBS a couple of weeks ago.

Page 590 of this topic.
It took alot of scrolling, but I went back in time and found it =O

At 8/31/04 11:06 PM, j00bie wrote:

At 8/31/04 11:00 PM, ShittyKitty wrote: Nuh-uh nuh-uh nuh-uh! I thought of it all by myself. :-p Besides, I wasn't here for that; I just started being active in the BBS a couple of weeks ago.

Page 590 of this topic.
It took alot of scrolling, but I went back in time and found it =O

Jeez, talk about taking my thunder! That's the exact same stats that I was aiming for! Ugh...now I feel unmotivated....so much for that Total Listing update you wanted..... ;-P

At 8/31/04 10:04 PM, Iamnotpoxpowereither wrote: Who the hell needs an alt anyway?

Alt accounts are for idiots ):<

At 8/31/04 11:09 PM, ShittyKitty wrote: blawblawblaw I wasnt here, OH NOES!!!

THEN EXPLAIN THIS!!!
Sign-up Date:
02/06/2002
DUN DUN DUNNNNNNNN

At 8/31/04 11:09 PM, BonusStage wrote: Alt accounts are for idiots ):<

I WONDER WHO THAT IS!!!!!

At 8/31/04 11:09 PM, BonusStage wrote:

At 8/31/04 10:04 PM, Iamnotpoxpowereither wrote: Who the hell needs an alt anyway?

Alt accounts are for idiots ):<

Yah!! I was wondering why your name wasn't linked in the forum page. I noticed you changed your regular account's name to "TypeNameHere" as well. Will this be a permanent change, or are you just messing with our heads?

At 8/31/04 11:11 PM, j00bie wrote:

At 8/31/04 11:09 PM, ShittyKitty wrote: blawblawblaw I wasnt here, OH NOES!!!

THEN EXPLAIN THIS!!!

SIR, I SUGGEST YOU READ THE WHOLE POST

"I just started being active in the BBS a couple of weeks ago."

At 8/31/04 11:19 PM, TypeNameHere wrote:

At 8/31/04 11:14 PM, TheJoe324 wrote:

At 8/31/04 11:11 PM, j00bie wrote:

At 8/31/04 11:09 PM, ShittyKitty wrote: blawblawblaw I wasnt here, OH NOES!!!

THEN EXPLAIN THIS!!!

SIR, I SUGGEST YOU READ THE WHOLE POST

"I just started being active in the BBS a couple of weeks ago."

I do declare that J03 just laid the beat down
/me imitates a spanking sound :o

I posted a rebuttal here because I was locked out of this thread (4 posts in 30 minutes). But yeah, it's the same idea.

silly shitkit (You likey :D)

Nice, very nice. So let's see, I've got ShittyKitty, SK, Shitty, and now ShitKit. Interesting...actually, I'm contemplating playing around with a name change myself. Let's see if I can give it a shot.

At 8/31/04 11:26 PM, TypeNameHere wrote:

At 8/31/04 11:22 PM, ShittyKitty wrote: I'm contemplating playing around with a name change myself. Let's see if I can give it a shot.

Just make sure to have an alt account handy ok :)

Ha ha! I can post again! I was trying to tell you "Just got one :)", but it blocked me because of that limit thing. Like my new name?

At 8/31/04 11:14 PM, TheJoe324 wrote: SIR, I SUGGEST YOU READ THE WHOLE POST
"I just started being active in the BBS a couple of weeks ago."

Oh, I read the whole post... I just didnt want 35 pages of searching this thread to go to waste =O

First to deposit... again
Bed time now =O

I just got up another rank in the b/p department yay! Congradulations to everyone else on their level-ups!

At 9/1/04 12:58 AM, BackToNormal wrote: I just got up another rank in the b/p department yay! Congradulations to everyone else on their level-ups!

Congrats to you too. Arr, you may be a b/p rank ahead of me now, but I'll be a level 11 soon.....;-P

Okay, I thought that changing my name would be cool, but I've decided I like ShittyKitty better. I'll keep TheNoobinator on the side, though ;-)

At 8/31/04 10:46 PM, TypeNameHere wrote:
Hmmm it does seem that back then they would have been getting mass points every day, Joe has said he used to get some of those 100+ averages on your lists :\

Joe was nibbling at the red font a few times, or what would have bene the red font if it was at the site at the time, but none of those points he gained were in relation to ramping up the minimum. All of them came from his being around so much that he voted on UJ flash more often than he had been.

hmmm so taht means no points for anyone, oh to bad i guess :(

None of the "under 200" had been intended to go back under judgement ... even when they did squib the coding where it actually happened. My joke at the time was that Wade said "do this," James did, and while Wade was busy going, "Holy SHIT!!!!", James' response consisted of a raised eyebrow and, "well, that wasn't quite what we wanted to do ... "

The under 200 list was installed as a "secret" as it was taking us (those who knew about the project) "too long" to finish it off. Straight up ... At only 500 (or whatever it was) per day, I earned some kind of bonus (like at least bothering to give me the fucking points I earned on those mass flag deletions Wade has done) and that's nothing compared to what people like Joe and Greg (they are just the ones over 1k/day of whom I'm actually aware) deserved. Odds on they got jack shit for 5 months of work done for the benefit OF NG ... at the end of it everyone, including the wastes of air that voted 1 time, got a generic "thanks" ... better than nothing but FAR, far less than what was deserved.

Yeah, I'm still bitter and it fed into the rest of my other "issues." Those of you who know me know it takes more than a few incidents to set me off, so even when the last TWO times Wade did mass deletes of flagged entires exactly no one got any points at all ... 2500 flash in all, I didn't lose it. They add up in the back of my head though.

We're only now FINALLY getting the occasional point for flagged shit ... and not nearly as much as what we should be getting for them, but there's several people (not including me) that are owed 1k BPs off that crap. I'm only owed ~500.

The fact that NO ONE got ANYTHING off of that huge effort we all put forth for them in voting everything up to 200 played a large part in why I was so pissed off the FIRST time we got fucked over on the flag deletions. Even then, I was still on NG's "side," talking down people who were more pissed off than I was about having earned no points off 900 flash upon which we should have earned a LOT of BPs. "No one got anything, so we're all screwed. They'll fix it up for the next time" ... famous last words ...

When no one got any points the SECOND time, AND Wade had stated that we would be, there wasn't anyone left to talk ME down. When James is wandering in and out of thread putting people down, and everyone is ignoring that I've said anything at all? Yeah, at that point all bets are off.

The simple fact is, despite my prior comments that we all got screwed equally, that ONLY people who voted and flagged it got screwed, and those of us who actually give a shit got MORE screwed than others. I voted 0 on top of everything I flagged just in case something goofy happened and I wasn't going to get the Blam when it was deleted. It obviously didn't matter for shit ... I got 0 points BOTH times, and yes, I'm still REALLY pissed off about it, particularly since Wade stated we would AND then couldn't even bother to make a comment when he finally deigned to noticed that we had not gotten any, and yes, that's a large part of the reason why I look for everything wrong in anything they do now. The final straw was when I had (four separate times) brought something of significance up in News threads and couldn't even get an acknowledgement that I had said anything.

I should have realized, back at the first time,when JT and I BOTH brought up the FAQ errors, that I was wasting my breath requesting that NG actually do something. It's a fucking TEXT webpage, but apparently it's too difficult to read anything either of us write and actually fix what's wrong. If the FAQ were accurate, I'd have dropped from Major General to Lieutenant General the day they posted it. I've made (more than my share lol) mistakes on the EGRL while running it ... posting at the website at least allows me the luxury of being able to EDIT, which I have never been able to do here (I'm done being an apologist or excusing the nonsense, so don't even waste your time explaining why I can't edit here), and fix the error. They didn't post the FAQ itself in a News thread, just that they had updated it, so there's no excuse for it having gone this long being WRONG since it was posted.

If they listened to the people about ramping the minimum up to 300 votes, I'd most assuredly lose it. You ain't seen nothing if you think I've "lost it" on James, Wade, or Kam-ron ... that was just me being pissed. Let's just say that the insurance company of last person upon whom I "went apeshit" sued ME to recover the medical costs entailed by our encounter ... and lost.

At 8/31/04 08:00 PM, D0GMA wrote: I still think you'll be around 75. The reality is that you pased, right before you left, a number of fast moving folks. A lot of the people the group of you passed alng the way are slow or stalled. Dropping down to, or out of, the top 100 is unrealistic IMO.

Haha cool! That means that i CAN be at the top 50 by next year :)

At 8/31/04 11:33 PM, TheNoobinator wrote: Ha ha! I can post again! I was trying to tell you "Just got one :)", but it blocked me because of that limit thing. Like my new name?

Again? What do you mean, again? You only have 1 post!

Naughty kitty... :P

At 8/31/04 11:26 PM, TypeNameHere wrote:

Just make sure to have an alt account handy ok :)

Alts accounts... who needs'em anyway !?

At 9/1/04 08:15 AM, Mammooth wrote:

Alts accounts... who needs'em anyway !?

I do!