Coop recovers from a night of D&D, while congratulating:
Auz: 4,444 Posts; 53,000 B/P
Gamejunkie: 2,500 Days on Newgrounds
naronic: Level 14
sumidiotdude: Gold Whistle
At 10/19/09 06:46 AM, Bahamut wrote:
At 10/19/09 04:02 AM, Coop83 wrote:
At 10/18/09 07:56 AM, Bahamut wrote:
Please Coop, you gotta think for the other statwhores as well as yourself.
There is no Coop any more. Coop was assimilated into the hive mind of Wade weeks ago and you never noticed a thing. He is one of us now. Mwahahahahahaha!
Well, I'm fucked. :(
Well, look on the bright side - if you were, then so was Afro_Stud
ROFLCOPTER
Classic.
Indeed.
At 10/19/09 06:53 AM, EternitySpent wrote:
Coop83 - We have to play Minnesota sometime this year. (They're really the only team I can make that joke about at this point. I wanted to say the Islanders, but shit with Tavares they'd probably beat us.)
Well, even the best teams can have off days. I wouldn't be surprised if your first win came against the Pens :P
Well... maybe a little
At 10/19/09 10:39 AM, Auz wrote:
At 10/19/09 04:02 AM, Coop83 wrote:
At 10/18/09 12:25 PM, Auz wrote:
I don't know. Maybe just an assumption I made long before ordinary users got to know who the review moderators were. And like 3/4 of the review moderation team was also forum mod back then.
Well, when you say a forum of our own, it's not really a forum... more of a website.
A website? Don't think I've ever heard of that before. Like a separate website from NG that only mods have access to? Or is it still run by NG's admins?
Yes, it's a website run by the NG admins. It's called Facebook.
At 10/19/09 01:30 PM, schneelocke wrote:
I'm less sure about the whole "turn-based strategy" thing. Sure, you could do that, too, but let's face it, that wouldn't be a sequel, it'd be an entirely different game. (And personally, I don't like strategy games that much, either, although I'll also admit that that may bias me against your idea there. Hmm, can you use "bias" as a verb?)
Well, picking off trained monkeys running at the trebuchet is hardly strategy. But I see where you're coming from.
Oh, and it might be better to say "may make me more biased against your idea"
At 10/19/09 03:53 PM, reverend wrote:
At 10/19/09 04:02 AM, Coop83 wrote:
I didn't watch a single pitch of that live - the game was due to start 1am and I can't be having with that. I've booked the World Series off work, so they'd better win 2 more to guarantee the spot there now!
Let's see 1am CDT would be 7am BST; so it would have been still going on when you woke up. Ha!
1am BST was when it started...
I'm not sure if the Yanks are going to win this afternoon. It's Pettite verses Weaver so it's going to be a good one, but if the Angles are going to try and win this series, they have to make their stand now.
Well, we out-bombed the Angels, but with no men on base, they only needed to score 5 runs to beat us. With three runs of their own from the Home Run, it wasn't that difficult for them. A small alarm bell, but we've got CC tonight.