At 8/4/03 01:10 PM, Recon_Rebel wrote:
At 8/4/03 11:04 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
The nunchaku just have the perfect crispness to the chain, and the black of the handles is nice, it just looks good as an icon on every single one of your posts. And that's why I want to be level 16, cause I want it as my avatar. Not because I want to wield it.
The chain is too long for practical use (it's easier to size cords and they're quiet). The icon look's (did I spell that right writer) good with a blue background. Watch out for that centrifugal force. It'll getcha!!
I actually mentioned that you had pointed that out months ago somewhere on the BBS recently, maybe yesterday or day before. Heh. #;-}>
Well, you COULD use them to whip at people long distance, but you can't do the twirly stuff you're supposed to do with 'em, eh? #;-}>
Anywayyyyyyy. Like I said, looks over practicality, for me, seeing as how they're not real.
Oh, and since you asked, no... you didn't phrase it correctly. #;-}>
"The icon look's good" makes no sense whatsoever. You have two options:
"The icon looks good" - this would be the standard option, and the one you presumably were going for. It's just the verb ending for a singular noun. If you were talking about iconS, of course, it would be "the icons look good." IOW, most times, you put the s on the verb or you put it on the noun, but you don't put it on neither or both. #;-}>
"The icon's look's good" - while a strange way to put it, this is actually correct as well. icon's = of the icon (possessive), and look's in this case = look is (contraction). "The look of the icon is good," IOW, or "the icon's look is good." But when you make both 's, it does look and sound a bit weird. Still correct, though!
This concludes our English lession for the day. Any questions?
Well, I got one. Do I get paid for this? #;-}> Damn I need a job. :::goes back to sending out applications:::