At 7/23/05 05:06 AM, Bahamut7 wrote:
I agree with long congrats lists. I think it shows a quality congrats list. Also, I'm fine.
Fair enough then. I was just voicing my concern and it seems there's nothing I can do to change it, so I will just scroll past for long lists now.
At 7/23/05 02:08 AM, Alkador wrote:
The definate end? It was good.
Lots of questions? What happened? You *might* find out...
At 7/23/05 08:12 AM, DonDoli wrote:
I don't see how you can get enough congrats, the more the merrier.
Fair enough then. I guess I can understand your side as well. You feel the more people congratulated, the more people will be happy. Well, most of time. ;)
Again, I was doing nothing else then replying to your opinion with an opinion of my own.
And don't try to make other people hate me and blame the reason of the end of your story on me. The story didn't end because of me. The end was about to come anyway.
I know. I just added that comment because it's the truth. I am a person that sticks to the truth. Anyway, thank you for spending your time giving your side. It's appreciated. You just do what you do. ;)
At 7/24/05 02:53 AM, iscruLz wrote:
well I am making a long one right now.and anding on replys to old posts I dont mind long congrats list at all.
Fair enough then. I guess you'd agree if you made them. There was one time (like 5 - 6 months ago) when I did so as well. But I stopped because of a friend's opinion. And I had the story, so that was my 'nicotene patch'.
At 7/24/05 03:14 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
I think you slightly misunderstood. I told you that the response to your super-long mail to me was the longest PERSONAL mail I'd sent in 2005.
I'm a slightly_confused_dude. Well, I'm happy again. As I said, I'm the type of person that likes to spend time sending e-mails to others. One of my secret policies. ;)
At 7/26/05 04:28 AM, M-A-R-C-U-S wrote:
im sorry, how 1337 am i again?
Not very leet. Actually, that's pretty crap. Worthless piece of trash.
Anyway, how is everyone? =)