At 4/30/06 08:55 AM, RedGlare wrote:

back but the Americans came right away *cough* *cough*

Are you implying that im American? And yes they did sit back and let Germany invade Czechislovakia.

No I am not I am implying that saying Britain was late to react is something stupid when it took the Americans years longer.

At 4/30/06 08:57 AM, WastedWizard wrote:

At 4/30/06 08:55 AM, RedGlare wrote:

back but the Americans came right away *cough* *cough*

Are you implying that im American? And yes they did sit back and let Germany invade Czechislovakia.

No I am not I am implying that saying Britain was late to react is something stupid when it took the Americans years longer.

That desn't change the fact they were late to react. Thats like saying a kid who took an hour to complete a 5 minute race isn't slow because another kid took 3.

At 4/30/06 08:59 AM, RedGlare wrote: That desn't change the fact they were late to react. Thats like saying a kid who took an hour to complete a 5 minute race isn't slow because another kid took 3.

You cannot blame us, world war 1 took a lot out of us and a lot of people were scared of another war.

this has turned into war.

cant you just agree that britain was late to react as they didnt want war.
america didnt want to get involved with something that was thousands of miles away and that it didnt affect them until japan bombed pearl harbour

At 4/30/06 09:01 AM, WastedWizard wrote:

At 4/30/06 08:59 AM, RedGlare wrote: That desn't change the fact they were late to react. Thats like saying a kid who took an hour to complete a 5 minute race isn't slow because another kid took 3.

You cannot blame us, world war 1 took a lot out of us and a lot of people were scared of another war.

Ofcourse i can blame the British government for the invasion of Czechislovakia. It was entirely there fault. Plus Government polls indicated a majority against the invaision demanding Britain help.

But they didn't. If Britain didn't wan't a war it should have not agreed to Hitlers demands. Or at least brought the Czechs in on the discussions. But no the Government stab them in the back.

it is in the past now and nothing you can do will change it.the goverment may have been wrong but that is how you learn not to do the same thing again

At 4/30/06 09:21 AM, rayzerblayze wrote: it is in the past now and nothing you can do will change it.the goverment may have been wrong but that is how you learn not to do the same thing again

But we did the same thing again lots of times. Histories full of examples of us stabbing in the back. The British Empire was not maintained by vast legions it was built on expert manipulation and puppertering.

this is right but there is nothing that can be done about it.if we just repeat our mistakes again and again more inncoent lives wil be lost.what would we be able to do about it.there is no answer.life is cruel

At 4/30/06 09:28 AM, rayzerblayze wrote: this is right but there is nothing that can be done about it.if we just repeat our mistakes again and again more inncoent lives wil be lost.what would we be able to do about it.there is no answer.life is cruel

I said that, "I don't want an argument"

fighting is wrong.it should be settled with words instead of fists and weapons.everyone should agree on that

At 4/30/06 09:31 AM, WastedWizard wrote: I said that, "I don't want an argument"

Wow, you guys are really having a field day with this issue aren't you?

Just try to keep tempers in check. It's violent disagreements that can get clubs killed. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Remember that and respect it when answering each other.

thats what were trying to do it just isnt working as well as we hoped

None of us got violent as far as I know we were not swearing of mocking each other but had a heated debate and that is a good thing.

At 4/30/06 09:49 AM, WastedWizard wrote: None of us got violent as far as I know we were not swearing of mocking each other but had a heated debate and that is a good thing.

I love debates as well, but we just need to be careful and know when to back it down a bit.

At 4/30/06 09:51 AM, Peregrinus wrote:

At 4/30/06 09:49 AM, WastedWizard wrote: None of us got violent as far as I know we were not swearing of mocking each other but had a heated debate and that is a good thing.

I love debates as well, but we just need to be careful and know when to back it down a bit.

I understand sir, congrats on lvl 10

congratulations to both of you for going up levels

At 4/30/06 09:57 AM, rayzerblayze wrote: congratulations to both of you for going up levels

I have gone up a lvl? lol I wish

At 4/30/06 10:02 AM, WastedWizard wrote:

At 4/30/06 09:57 AM, rayzerblayze wrote: congratulations to both of you for going up levels

I have gone up a lvl? lol I wish

Here's a question for ya what military sci fi tech would you think we could use like Bipedal armour and robots?

At 4/30/06 10:02 AM, WastedWizard wrote:

At 4/30/06 09:57 AM, rayzerblayze wrote: congratulations to both of you for going up levels

I have gone up a lvl? lol I wish

it must have been because you changed your aura

At 4/30/06 11:20 AM, RedGlare wrote: Here's a question for ya what military sci fi tech would you think we could use like Bipedal armour and robots?

I'm not too clear about your question. But I'll try to answer with what I can draw from it:

So far, the US military is developing the "future warrior" program. It has stuff like a suit that is wired to send a soldiers vital signs to a command point, new non-lethal weaponry etc. I have a Popular Science book about the 21st Century Soldier. Which is where I saw that. Cool stuff.

At 4/30/06 02:46 PM, rayzerblayze wrote: it must have been because you changed your aura

Probably. He was neutral before (I think). Thanks for the congrats.

What i mean't was do you think any of those movie weapons like bipedal armour or robot solsiers are feasible or just wishful thinking?

At 4/30/06 02:57 PM, RedGlare wrote: What i mean't was do you think any of those movie weapons like bipedal armour or robot solsiers are feasible or just wishful thinking?

Oh ok. I figured it was something like that once I re-read your post.

They already do use robots in combat roles. The traditional de-mining/bomb clearing operations, as well as one that is used for recon. I remember seeing a demonstration of it once. Cool shit. You can throw it out of a building to check the way is clear, or drive it into one and up stairs to see if there are hostiles inside.

They also use tiny model aircraft, some no smaller than one's hand, for aerial reconnaisance that the troops on the ground can control directly and get visual immediately (rather than the images going to a com station several miles behind the front lines.

Bi-pedal armor:
Not sure what you mean by that (I'll look it up soon, a bit busy with other stuff)

But I know that they are still working on more effective ways of shielding troops from a plethora of small arms rounds. They've developed soft-shell armor that can stop an AK-47 round, but it's too bulky as of yet, so they stick with ballistic plates. Which are heavy as hell.

do you mean like in starship troopers and the terminator.it could happen but in a couple of decades at least.also they have prototype lazers that there testing and they are always designing new vehicles so in a few years you could see walkers like the ones from star wars

At 4/30/06 03:06 PM, Peregrinus wrote:

At 4/30/06 02:57 PM, RedGlare wrote: What i mean't was do you think any of those movie weapons like bipedal armour or robot solsiers are feasible or just wishful thinking?

Bi-pedal armor:
Not sure what you mean by that (I'll look it up soon, a bit busy with other stuff)

The clue is in the name. Bipedal what is bipedal, it has 2.......

At 4/30/06 03:09 PM, rayzerblayze wrote: do you mean like in starship troopers and the terminator.it could happen but in a couple of decades at least.also they have prototype lazers that there testing and they are always designing new vehicles so in a few years you could see walkers like the ones from star wars

I don't think so and lazers have been around since the Gulf war as anti tank weapons. And Terminator what the hell that would be dumb A.I. is a horrible idea. And sorry but Bipedal armour isn't going to happen heres why.

1) they require legs take out the legs take out the walker.

2) the less surface area you have the harder you are to hit.

3) Amour tech is going in the other direction closer to the floor tanks.

So unfortunatly walkers are just for films and games.

well people can dream cant they.and they can believe in what they want to believe in.

also what were the lazers for?

At 4/30/06 03:29 PM, rayzerblayze wrote: well people can dream cant they.and they can believe in what they want to believe in.

also what were the lazers for?

Anti tank weapons

werent they just lazer guided

also we need to get the war crew forums active as well so i'm just saying

At 4/30/06 03:34 PM, rayzerblayze wrote: werent they just lazer guided

No they were lazers they were bright blue beams of light imploding a tank.

alright then.sounds pretty cool though.