At 12/11/04 07:20 AM, Tom_s00 wrote:
Quick question Red, under the current system with one user getting voted in and one getting kicked out each month, dosn't this mean that there will only ever be 14 reglars? unless one month everyone desides not to use their 'out' vote, which is very unlikly to happen? am i right, if not please correct.
Well, it's gonna be a little while before someone isn't kicked out, but once we make the list a little bit more "current," then you'll see some months where we won't have anyone getting more than 2 out-votes.
The original list might have been a little biased because the original purpose of the list was to list everyone who had helped out in the forum. Now, it's more of a "current regulars" list, which means that those who were put on the original list might not fit the criteria that we have recently established.
To sum it up, a few people were put on the list in the beginning that don't fit the new rules, so after they are weeded out, then we'll start to see the list becoming bigger in size.
Thanks for the question Tom.
At 12/11/04 07:58 AM, BonusStage wrote:
Heh, i DO like it when i pass someone, so yes post this three times every month, OR ELSE <3
...OR ELSE WHAT!?! </unoriginal>
(congrats on your new spot, btw)
At 12/11/04 07:59 AM, Denvish wrote:
At 12/11/04 05:54 AM, RedCircle wrote:
Saturday, December 11, 2004 Mini-update. (List C only)
Cool update. Thanks Mike.
Thanks Bob.
At 12/11/04 07:20 AM, Tom_s00 wrote:
dosn't this mean that there will only ever be 14 reglars? unless one month everyone desides not to use their 'out' vote, which is very unlikly to happen?
There are currently 2 Regulars that I would consider voting off (were 3, but Pure appears to have made a recovery). Once they're gone, I personally won't be using the 'out' vote any more... although that'll be in 2 months, by which time, some other members may have dropped into obscurity...
Well, we hope not, cause there are some cool peeps on the current list, but I hate to say it...in two months, who knows what's gonna happen.
At 12/11/04 09:08 AM, carmelhadinosaur wrote:
At 12/11/04 05:54 AM, RedCircle wrote:
Bonus slid by Carmel,
I'll slid @ at him (@=back?)
Carmel, you are going to have to start reviewing more movies to get back @ him, yanno! (@ = at ... which is the right definition)
#;-}>
Hey i thought im the only one who steals that! :O
Ask Shitty and D0GMA. I stole that a few times too =O
At 12/11/04 09:20 AM, ramagi wrote:
At 12/11/04 05:54 AM, RedCircle wrote:
Ramagi is doing excellent as you may have noticed on the Pentalist #;-}> *cough* wrong
*cough* RIGHT.
#01 | 12150 : __810 : _51781 : _2680 :: _67421 || ramagi <- right
Hahaha...RIGHT too.
Lets see if the hidden meaning is figured out in that.
Well I actually wen back and read a lot of the pages I skiped so I know am informed.
You still didn't answer my question ramagi. What was so important about the update?
At 12/11/04 10:15 AM, j00bie wrote:
Why is ramagi in bold?
Cause she is in first place.
It makes me feel un-swell :'(
To know that it'll be a while before you are first?
Heh, don't feel so bad Jeff. You are kicking my ass.