At 7/31/25 01:01 AM, Porter wrote:At 7/31/25 12:35 AM, Beetledrum wrote:And when the user does turn 18 they can get the M-A rated content aswell.Agreed.
Once a user has set their birthday, its going to remain that way and wont be modifiable.
Hmm. Speaking from experience, parents could lie for their kid when making an account. Had my parents create my first online accounts when I was 10. One of those sites was Flipnote, and if you were below 13, you had to be approved to be let in, and if so, you received a certificate of approval! (Weird and unheard of these days...)
My point being is with that system, parents could lie for their childs age online to gain access to the web. As the line from old commercials say, "Ask your parents permission before going online." But hey, what do I know, what do you think?
I have never encountered this before.
Some parents actually do this? Well, then it isnt just kids doing it.
As for Ng, I also had the controversial idea To add Tags to accounts.
For example If an account is Deemed safe for viewing theres a green tag "SAFE" next to it (basicaly less M-A rated stuff and more E-T rated stuff on an account).
But if the account is Strictly for posting NSFW content (less E-T content, more M-A rated content on profile) there would be a red tag with "FOR ADULTS" written on it.
And if a user is under 18, Accounts with the "FOR ADULTS" label would be Invisible to them (basicaly if they were blocked, all posts invisible, with the added feature of the account ITSELF being invisible.)
I have made a concept image of what they might look like:
Again this idea might be flawed in alot of ways but this is what I had in mind.
But If you feel like this is unecessary, I wont blame you. Parents should be better at parenting and not being better at not giving a crap about what their kids see, Bad parenting always leads to disaster, especially when it comes to the internet.