At 8/5/25 01:01 AM, KittyhawkMontrose wrote:At 8/5/25 12:43 AM, DioShiba wrote:Truthfully, I dont think any of us know the best solution.
I know some users are really hyping up crypto but I still have my reasons to be hesitant on touching it after having some shit experiences with crypto bros and whatever other types of people who use that being really weird to a point where they are cunts in their own respect. I myself having dealt with one on here that I blocked.
Although it pains me to say it if that turns out to be the best alternative so be it but I'll be upfront and honest it very much gives me concerns of the direction newgrounds will go should that become the primary method of payment. The last thing we need is that this becomes a web3 platform and that could very well push a good portion of users away.
There is no best solution, but you can try to do better. I've had bad experiences with fast food, but I still eat it. Educate yourself and you'll do fine with crypto. I think if more people did that, they wouldn't be so scared. We need to be bold in this war on freedom.
I've never stated that Crypto is a bad thing in of itself.
Its the kind of people who use it I have more of a problem with.
I'm still of the solution that the governent makes internet access illegal for children under 15-16 in addition to smartphones and tablets instead of forcing censorship.
That's still censorship. And that still requires an age check, so we're back to square one. I think we need to start separating ourselves from these censorious assholes with the tools that are already available.
I'm not exactly clear on how age restrictions are the same thing as censorship.
Care to explain where that thought process is going? Because the last I checked enforcing restrictions on who sees what content based on what age isn't exactly censorship in the sense that its prohibited for everyone to see the content that's being restricted in that respect.
At 8/6/25 12:51 PM, OnixDark wrote:i think the idea is less "block children from the internet" and more "remind parents that there are places that are NOT made for children and that instead of banning those places, parents should be taking measures to keep their children away from those places". but i could be wrong.
Well that's exactly it.
Parents need to be the ones accountable when it comes to their kids. To demand that financial instutions and platforms like Newgrounds, Itch.io and Steam censor content because of gay themes and sexuality is absurd because your placing the responsibility of a parent onto the company when that's not the company's business.
Because if the parents aren't doing their jobs as parents and use the "U dunno how hard it is to be mommy/daddy to kids" jhst to hand their kids a tablet and force the companies to something, then it affects those who are accountable for what they do and ruins shit for everyone.