At 9/21/05 12:18 PM, Arch_Angel_Rhys wrote: rate this because i hate the text.
6.5/10 - I'm not too keen on that big blob to the left of the render. looks kinda like a teardrop. It looks really out of place in my view, just doesnt fit in with the otherwise spiky background (and hair). Nice render... pretty random. Shit text.
That is all.
At 9/21/05 12:50 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:At 9/21/05 12:18 PM, Arch_Angel_Rhys wrote: rate this because i hate the text.6.5/10 - I'm not too keen on that big blob to the left of the render. looks kinda like a teardrop.
its part of the render. its a blurry feather.
It looks really out of place in my view, just doesnt fit in with the otherwise spiky background (and hair). Nice render... pretty random.
Shit text. shit text. shit text shit text shit text.
i'm gonna sort out my text now.
That is all.
wahey.
At 9/21/05 12:57 PM, Arch_Angel_Rhys wrote: its part of the render. its a blurry feather.
Ok, now I'm even more confused.
At 9/21/05 01:27 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:At 9/21/05 12:57 PM, Arch_Angel_Rhys wrote: its part of the render. its a blurry feather.Ok, now I'm even more confused.
the render is of tifa jumping with feathers falling around her. that feather is a closer one and is blurred so it looks like a tear drop.
now rate my current and this. please.
rate sig plz. I want to know what other people think about it.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
At 9/21/05 09:17 PM, Makaio wrote:'D
damn fireworks fucking up the colors...............i unclicked the remove unused colors and everyhting and the bastard still did it...........
KILL ALL SONS A BITCHES.
can some one make me a sig with ninja giaden [NEW ONE] with one of those dart things in his hand and in the background its crimson with ninja master across it
At 9/21/05 10:29 PM, conkerman wrote: can some one make me a sig with ninja giaden [NEW ONE] with one of those dart things in his hand and in the background its crimson with ninja master across it
Just so you know, I believe this is the Sig Rater forum... *sorry if this was uncalled for*
Not the Sig Makers...
Check da rools or watever, b niec. It should say always b a tough guy.
At 9/21/05 12:18 PM, Arch_Angel_Rhys wrote: rate this because i hate the text.
7.5/10. The text isn't that bad. Anyway, the character looks good. You've used a nice background as well.
At 9/21/05 01:35 PM, Arch_Angel_Rhys wrote: now rate my current and this. please.
7.5/10. The colours in that sig are very nice. Nice character used on the sig. The font's quite good.
At 9/21/05 06:28 PM, Grandfather-Clock wrote: rate my sig you dirty clowns
7/10. I think it's most likely that you drew that picture. It's a nice drawing. The bottom part of the sig looks a bit strange since it cuts off the picture there. :S
At 9/21/05 07:26 PM, Mango-Man wrote: rate plz
http://i7.photobucke..0Pictures/warsig.png
7/10. Nice colours used in the background. Quite an interesting character used there. Nice font.
At 9/21/05 07:35 PM, __Black_Mage__ wrote: rate sig plz. I want to know what other people think about it.
7/10. The picture looks quite funny. The colours are good.
At 9/21/05 09:17 PM, Makaio wrote:'D
0.5/10. Just a bunch of text animation with flashing lights. Not an appropriate sig for the BBS.
At 9/22/05 06:53 AM, xXxcryptFiendXxX wrote: I'll join. ^ 5/10
You need to ask QuikFox if you could rate sigs, sorry.
At 9/22/05 11:40 AM, Fucking_Idiot wrote: 7.5/10. The text isn't that bad. Anyway, the character looks good. You've used a nice background as well.
7.5/10. The colours in that sig are very nice. Nice character used on the sig. The font's quite good.
7/10. I think it's most likely that you drew that picture. It's a nice drawing. The bottom part of the sig looks a bit strange since it cuts off the picture there. :S
7/10. Nice colours used in the background. Quite an interesting character used there. Nice font.
7/10. The picture looks quite funny. The colours are good.
i'm gonna stop getting ratings here. all i seem to get from you are sevens for everyone, even when the quality of the sigs differ hugley. you need to look at technique and difficulty, not just giving 7's cause you were told you mark too high and dont wanna be nasty and give worse sigs a lower rating.
At 9/22/05 02:38 PM, Arch_Angel_Rhys wrote: stuff
well he has an accurate name,and mine was a humour sig and the animation is a surprise.......and since when was the word penis not appropriate for the bbs rofl.
At 9/22/05 01:30 PM, Mango-Man wrote: rate plz
http://i7.photobucke..atures/fordgtsig.jpg
8/10. Very nice red colours you've used there. The picture of the car fits well with the colours on the sig. Nice font.
At 9/22/05 02:38 PM, Arch_Angel_Rhys wrote: i'm gonna stop getting ratings here. all i seem to get from you are sevens for everyone, even when the quality of the sigs differ hugley. you need to look at technique and difficulty, not just giving 7's cause you were told you mark too high and dont wanna be nasty and give worse sigs a lower rating.
...I'm not going to bother arguing with what you said.
and since when was the word penis not appropriate for the bbs rofl.
No, it's okay for the word penis to be on the BBS. It's just the flashing lights on that sig that aren't appropriate. I believe flashing light pictures are against the BBS rules here.
At 9/23/05 07:32 AM, Ventar wrote: Is this better than my previous sig Bahamut7?
8/10. Well, the only difference is the different EG badge and the name. Still good anyway.
At 9/23/05 11:19 AM, Fucking_Idiot wrote: 8/10. Well, the only difference is the different EG badge and the name. Still good anyway.
Thanks for the kind rating(once again)
lol i didnt even think of it ass flashing lights rofl
i just though of it as adding a little contrast to the sig.............ur a poopie head.
can someone rate my sig? dont give me the credit blood bath made it i wanted to know if you all think it is good i think it is.
At 9/23/05 07:16 PM, -Skybound- wrote: Go ahead and rate mine if desire be.
6.5/10. Intersting character used there. The border looks good. Nice font.
At 9/23/05 07:25 PM, FourFingers wrote: what about mine?
2/10. The background colours are alright, but the font and the red lines make the sig look horrible.
At 9/23/05 08:50 PM, OsAmARaMa wrote: Remember this?
6/10. Ah, so it was you that had that sig. I remember that sig, but I didn't know who had that sig. Anyway, I think the sig's funny with oil in the LOTR text. An image in the background which makes the sig look nice.
At 9/23/05 11:13 PM, conkerman wrote: can someone rate my sig? dont give me the credit blood bath made it i wanted to know if you all think it is good i think it is.
6/10. An interesting character used there. The background's not bad. Nice text on the sword.
