At 12/12/18 12:56 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Glad to see you back on this and keeping the wiki going good.
~X~
OK guys- Next time somebody tells you Wikigrounds is useless or dead, just tell them...
.... THE "~X~" APPROVES !!!!!!!!
At 12/12/18 12:56 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote: Glad to see you back on this and keeping the wiki going good.
~X~
OK guys- Next time somebody tells you Wikigrounds is useless or dead, just tell them...
.... THE "~X~" APPROVES !!!!!!!!
At 12/12/18 07:43 AM, Quisty wrote:At 12/11/18 09:02 PM, IceDragon64 wrote: If anybody wants to work on pages that need work- take a look at the Recent Changes Page- on the right hand side is a list of pages that have no categories. These include about 40 pages that are either crude pages knocked together by people who don't categorise, or vandalised pages.I will gladly help you out. I have done lots of works with wiki before. I know some users pages that need lots of fixing.
Good luck Quisty. Let us know how you enjoy fixing things up. It could turn into a full time gig as well.
At 12/13/18 11:58 PM, Quisty wrote:At 12/12/18 10:39 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Good luck Quisty. Let us know how you enjoy fixing things up. It could turn into a full time gig as well.No fulltime gigs for me atm. Just trying to help out. We will see how this turns out as I have any free time. I made the account to edit tho..so step one is done.
That is nice that you are helping out. Making the account is always the first step. Take it slow, and try to have fun with it.
At 12/21/18 01:11 AM, tyler2513 wrote:Somebody come visit this thread or the wiki itself, I'm lonely and tired of touching myself.
ITS TYLER !!!!! Welcome back. You have been at work, I see. See the PM I sent you. SO, what do you think of the wiki; it has grown in our absence, hasn't it. We left shortly after the 500 Pages project. I predict if we sharpen up the wiki it will drop back down a bit with some housekeeping. Little Rena is still around and Doctor Strongbad at least monitors the thread and keeps up a dialogue. If only Salnax and Spaintendo were to come at least now and then...
If we could set up a small team of people who came by even once a month between them it would be better.
At 12/21/18 01:11 AM, tyler2513 wrote:Somebody come visit this thread or the wiki itself, I'm lonely and tired of touching myself.
OK. So Tyler2513 is leading for a while. He has done some great tidying up work, including removal of a number of crap pages.
Here is a project I would like people to work on, if they feel inspired:
https://newgrounds.wikia.com/wiki/Special:DeadendPages
Not only to we want internal links to other pages to be put into the pages, but they are probably relatively rough, recent pages that could do with looking at. In particular, the old page about Submission says little about Art- I just started the paragraph, but can't remember more than that and has Categories that should be removed, except I can't remember how to do that !
Go Team !
At 12/22/18 05:40 PM, tyler2513 wrote:At 12/22/18 04:29 PM, IceDragon64 wrote:OK. So Tyler2513 is leading for a while. He has done some great tidying up work, including removal of a number of crap pages.
Here is a project I would like people to work on, if they feel inspired:
https://newgrounds.wikia.com/wiki/Special:DeadendPages
Not only to we want internal links to other pages to be put into the pages, but they are probably relatively rough, recent pages that could do with looking at. In particular, the old page about Submission says little about Art- I just started the paragraph, but can't remember more than that and has Categories that should be removed, except I can't remember how to do that !
Go Team !
On it, also just so people know what in particular I've been working on recently; I went through all the pages without categories and either deleted the irrelevant pages or added at least 1 category to the remainder, and as for categories themselves I found a number of them to be copycats of already existing categories or just unneeded.
Other than this, in the meantime plenty of pages need links and images added.
------Looks good.
Another thing that is WAY out of date is the Supporting Newgrounds page which should obviously contain a USEFUL AND INTERESTING section about becoming a Newgrounds Supporter; in fact, once we get enough data together to write a quality Page on it, this should have its own page, with history, stats, choice comments on the BBS etc as well as a small section on Supporting Newgrounds page.
At 12/14/18 05:56 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:At 12/13/18 11:58 PM, Quisty wrote:At 12/12/18 10:39 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:Good luck Quisty. Let us know how you enjoy fixing things up. It could turn into a full time gig as well.
No fulltime gigs for me atm. Just trying to help out. We will see how this turns out as I have any free time. I made the account to edit tho..so step one is done.
That is nice that you are helping out. Making the account is always the first step. Take it slow, and try to have fun with it.
---Hey Dr, I wonder if you could join us on this thread with a few suggestions of what might attract volunteers on the wiki- and what might make the wiki more attractive? Tyler is willing to admin again and the Wiki is warming up a bit, but I will disappear again soon...
At 1/27/18 11:18 AM, littlbox wrote:At 1/25/18 08:17 PM, IceDragon64 wrote:What is wrong with it is that virtually nobody does any work on it! Us old guys have moved on to other things and I, for one am not coming back. You, or anybody else, are welcome to join in and create/improve the site- once you have done a substantial bit of work here, of reasonable quality, you can become admin- go get some points!
Sounds good. I've noticed that the wiki needs a bit of updating. I'll do what I can!
-- Now is the time to get on board. Talk to Tyler. He is doing the bulk of the work at the moment :)
At 5/14/15 09:54 PM, Viper wrote:At 5/13/15 11:36 PM, The-Great-One wrote:I thought about re-building Wikigrounds, starting from scratch.
It'd be nice if someone went through and fixed, updated, and improved it so it'd be better than it is now.
As it is now, it's in very dire need of an update. Also the mod and staff lists weren't up to date the last time I went on there...
-- It is not impossible. There is plenty to do, but a solid base to work on. Here are some more things I would like to see done, if you or anyone would like to join in:
I will soon be gone again for a long while, so if any of you are quietly watching this and thinking "maybe..." now is the time, while we have a few people around to inspire and get together for companionship and dialogue.
At 2/9/12 08:08 PM, Sectus wrote:I apologize for not being around the wiki that often. Obviously the redesign has brought up some confusion and I am having to adjust to the changes, and get used to all the new systems. I will get back to editing the wiki whenever I am able.
SO- are we going to see you on WikiG ?? There is SO much to do, starting right from 2012, when Tom announced the start of the Supporters system , including a major update on the History of Newgrounds from then on.
At 12/24/18 12:09 PM, IceDragon64 wrote:Stuff
Hope you don't mind, I updated two pages ("Audio Portal" and "Elite Guard Barracks"). I can update the staff/mod page if you'd like (not today, but soonâ„¢).
To answer some of your questions (bear with me, they didn't include in the quote for whatever reason):
1) Has Wade left? His page is ambiguous?
Yes, he's mostly living his own life but remains with mod status. He pops by from time to time (was on earlier this month, mostly lurking).
2) Has voting changed?
Yes. See this for more info.
3) Has TOTW gone?
From what I understand, yes. TOTW was removed as people were actively competing for it (which, yeah why not)
Audio / Forum / Games & Movies Moderator. Flag stolen content, don't be a dingus.
I updated the Staff and Moderators page as promised. I've also been doing random edits here and there under the following criteria: whatever comes up when I hit "random". A lot of the user-specific pages were minor edits to reflect level/BP and/or current/former mod status.
Audio / Forum / Games & Movies Moderator. Flag stolen content, don't be a dingus.
At 3/19/10 12:40 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote:Nice club icedragon. I remember you saying something about wiki before. Ill help keeping this abit active. Anyways nice club
~X~
Hey X - tell us what you think the Wiki should be/do - what might people look up on the wiki? How do you see its purpose? Do you ever use it?
At 4/3/10 09:34 PM, Fire wrote:Im in, I was actuatally one of the original founders of the wiki, but lost interest and it kinda stood there for a few years. Ill try to add some stuff when I can, like strategy/medal guides for games, stuff like that.
SO, Lord Fire the ORIGINAL Master of Wiklgrounds, are you still around at all? Do you ever drop by? What do YOU think Wikigrounds should be FOR? What do you think people expect to find there? Why did you create it in the first place?
It has been many years since the Monthly Theme has been won- we have been stuck on the 2012 Redesign for all these years - It has not really been finished as the summary for 2012 does not, for example, include the vital change that took place that year- the change to include non-Flash submissions. This was surely really important. Anyone who can sort out that whole Redesign Page can contact Tyler2513 and be a WINNER !!
Congratulations to Krinkels on his latest Madness Combat - 11:Expurgation, which has, of course won Daily, Weekly and Review Crew. TBH, since I have never been a great fan, nor watched any of them in the last 8 years, I found it hard to follow who was who etc., but I am sure that is just me.
I have created the most basic of Pages for 11: Ex on Wikigrounds, just to start the ball rolling. Please can somebody refer to the other MC episode pages for style and make this a proper Page. We are particularly looking to get data from different sources to improve the wiki's reputation as a one-stop source, so please combine data from the movie and its Page on NG, info from Krinkel's own Page and perhaps anything that Staff have said, along, ideally, with any special gems from other sites where it can be viewed.
Thanks to Salnax having put in a lot of sterling work on Madness Combat ten years ago, we have a great start on the subject; it would be great to maintain it.
I miss SALNAX on here. He was a really major part of the team and it is NOT the same without him. He created a large number of quality pages; he had a lot of good ideas and saw to it that they were started and organised and he understood how things worked better than most of us. :(
As ever, we are open to new volunteers to join, or even contribute without joining PLUS you can give us your thoughts on what kind of things you expect to see on Wikigrounds. WHY do you go there? Do you find the ANSWERS you are looking for?
I like the Wade Fulp page. Now that he rarely comes here, I think it summarises who he is and was on Newgrounds well for people who hear about him now, but don't know him now he doesn't work for NG.
Does somebody feel like EXPANDING the page for our Staff Member- BrenTheMan ???
If you don't know what we usually do for Staff, take a look at the other Staff Pages- Wade Fulp is a good one. Try to imagine why someone might look him up - what might people want to know in a one-stop way about a staff member? Probably what he DOES professionally is the first thing, it is why he has a Page after all.
Im paying attention. Busy, but here. I wonder if the entire collections and series lists have been gone through? Plenty of history to be recorded there.
Also another question, are articles about adult content allowed? is there a way to put the content under "spoiler" hiding mechanisms?
At 4/23/19 01:06 AM, Kehmicle wrote:Im paying attention. Busy, but here. I wonder if the entire collections and series lists have been gone through? Plenty of history to be recorded there.
Also another question, are articles about adult content allowed? is there a way to put the content under "spoiler" hiding mechanisms?
At 4/23/19 01:06 AM, Kehmicle wrote:Im paying attention. Busy, but here. I wonder if the entire collections and series lists have been gone through? Plenty of history to be recorded there.
Also another question, are articles about adult content allowed? is there a way to put the content under "spoiler" hiding mechanisms?
Thanks, I just went through new pages to expand a few. Shame about this platform is that it only tracks analytics back 30 days so I cant see any pages created older than 30 days in the new category. Ill look for that list of notables.
At 4/24/19 07:13 PM, Kehmicle wrote:Thanks, I just went through new pages to expand a few. Shame about this platform is that it only tracks analytics back 30 days so I cant see any pages created older than 30 days in the new category. Ill look for that list of notables.
Is there a way to correct that? How many days back should the new category be increased?
At 4/26/19 03:40 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:At 4/24/19 07:13 PM, Kehmicle wrote:Thanks, I just went through new pages to expand a few. Shame about this platform is that it only tracks analytics back 30 days so I cant see any pages created older than 30 days in the new category. Ill look for that list of notables.
Is there a way to correct that? How many days back should the new category be increased?
I am sure there is a way to see New things further back, but I can't remember.
At 4/24/19 07:13 PM, Kehmicle wrote:Thanks, I just went through new pages to expand a few. Shame about this platform is that it only tracks analytics back 30 days so I cant see any pages created older than 30 days in the new category. Ill look for that list of notables.
I have found the link to Notability. It is not a fixed list, but a dialogue; If somebody cares to write it out or resolve it in some way to a clear list of definitions of Notability- be my guest.
https://newgrounds.fandom.com/wiki/Forum:Notability_standards?t=20190103203616
At 4/26/19 03:40 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:At 4/24/19 07:13 PM, Kehmicle wrote:Thanks, I just went through new pages to expand a few. Shame about this platform is that it only tracks analytics back 30 days so I cant see any pages created older than 30 days in the new category. Ill look for that list of notables.
Is there a way to correct that? How many days back should the new category be increased?
If it could be made to be pages which have recieved zero edits since creation, That may be a better criteria. Just my thoughts.
At 4/27/19 06:49 PM, Kehmicle wrote:At 4/26/19 03:40 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:At 4/24/19 07:13 PM, Kehmicle wrote:Thanks, I just went through new pages to expand a few. Shame about this platform is that it only tracks analytics back 30 days so I cant see any pages created older than 30 days in the new category. Ill look for that list of notables.
Is there a way to correct that? How many days back should the new category be increased?
If it could be made to be pages which have recieved zero edits since creation, That may be a better criteria. Just my thoughts.
Criteria for what? Why do you want to see those? Many new pages are made in more than one edit and much of the work we need to check is editing/vandalising existing Pages.
At 5/2/19 06:27 PM, IceDragon64 wrote:At 4/27/19 06:49 PM, Kehmicle wrote:At 4/26/19 03:40 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:Is there a way to correct that? How many days back should the new category be increased?
If it could be made to be pages which have recieved zero edits since creation, That may be a better criteria. Just my thoughts.
That is an interesting way to go about it.
Criteria for what? Why do you want to see those? Many new pages are made in more than one edit and much of the work we need to check is editing/vandalising existing Pages.
That is a valid point. There is plenty of work that still needs to be done.
Hi, been following this thread for a while. Also, i have a question. Can we turn the Newgrounds into a semi-joke wiki, like 1d4chan? Just a thought.
At 5/4/19 02:07 PM, Magotrap wrote:Hi, been following this thread for a while. Also, i have a question. Can we turn the Newgrounds into a semi-joke wiki, like 1d4chan? Just a thought.
Please no. Hundreds of people have put thousands of hours into creating it as it is. Thousands of visitors come to see it as it is, so clearly there is a demand for Wkigounds as it is. If you wanted to make your own comic version I, for one would not object, so long as no attempt was made to make it actually look like or be confused with ours.