At 3/30/11 02:27 AM, cmw986 wrote:
And by review too apparently. I don't think he's exactly obligated to do so unfortunately, and given his response to you, I he's more concerned about making it look pretty rather than giving them "proper" value.
Wait a min. are you guys really saying you found getting those medals hard? I mean really the only one that took anytime what so ever was the gold shotgun in one round but I got that my 2ed time using the shotgun. I don't know I just found all those medals so very easy
Well, I played it on my desktop, which is a powerhouse compared to my crappy lappy. I'm sure I could turn the game into easy mode if I were really inclined to do so. That said, since I found the correct execution method, you could say it was easy anyways.
Also, if the only one that took you any time was killing 3k zombies with a shotgun in one game, how come 5k zombies in one game didn't take you that long? Hmm... /tease
This is one fundamental problem I'm finding that makes flash-based achievement systems is that on one end of the spectrum, you have the slow computers, and on the other end, you have the gaming computers. For certain games such as The Gun Game 2, it's impossible to do some expert medals on a slow computer. Yet on the other hand, it's nearly impossible to get the 50-point medal in Spaceland Adventure 2 with a fast computer. That is, unless you have mad dodging skills like this guy does.
And nevermind the fact that hacker tools exist...
@DiMono, you not having played the game really destroys your arguments for raising medal values doesn't it?