Top reviewers list

[Auz]

Does anyone know were I can find a list of the top reviewers on Newgrounds? I don't need an old list, but a list of the top 100 (or 1000) reviewers at this moment (and by top, I mean the most reviews). Don't point me to the Statistics, cause that's only the top 10.

I know there has to be a way to get a list without searching through 800000 profiles and deciding who have the most. Gfox' used some site to update the stats for he's pentalist, but unfortunaly that link doesn't work anymore (the link he placed on his site). I heard Jonthompson also had something were he could easily make and update a list with. Does anybody know what he used or can anybody point me to the right direction?

[Auz]

At 8/27/05 04:36 PM, Newgrundling wrote: Since you already know about the portal stats, I would try this thread: Top Reviewers List run by jonthomson. It has since been locked by Wade during a crack-down on crawling profiles, etc. for statistics, but you can find the most recent update on page 139 (from February 2nd of this year). It reads as follows:

I knew about that thread, but somebody told me it was locked somewhere in April. I searched through it, but I gave up at page 144 (cause I thought the list would be too old). Anyway the top 100 you posted is probably not that much different from todays top 100, thanks for helping me out. An automatic program or a site were I can easily find it would've been nice, but I think this'll do. Thanks again.

At 8/27/05 04:36 PM, Newgrundling wrote:

At 8/27/05 04:33 PM, Tom_s00 wrote: http://www.newground..om/portal/stats.html

Scroll down.

lol. I think you missed where he acknowledged that he knew about that, asked people not to post it, and specified that he was looking for more than the top 10.

Yes that were those statistics I mentioned =)

[jonthomson]

At 8/27/05 04:36 PM, Newgrundling wrote: Since you already know about the portal stats, I would try this thread: Top Reviewers List run by jonthomson. It has since been locked by Wade during a crack-down on crawling profiles, etc. for statistics

Lol, Wade didn't lock it, I did, way before all that fuss came up.

[YoinK]

At 8/27/05 04:36 PM, Newgrundling wrote: blah

001 10122 XwaynecoltX (unch)
002 7038 KWAS71KCK (unch)
003 4617 MI4_REAL_2001 (unch)
004 4393 Cyberdevil (unch)
005 4257 RyanAn (unch)
006 3669 M-A-R-C-U-S (+1)
007 3664 j00bie (-1)
008 3529 YoinK_VineS (unch)
009 2554 Hamy_jamy (unch)
010 2535 Violet-AIM (unch)

Those stats sure are old.. a few of us in the top 10 have made some big changes since february.

[iscrulz]

At 8/27/05 04:36 PM, Newgrundling wrote: 037 0904 Iscrulz (+5)

Wow that was alot for me. I think my rank would only be a little higher though.

[ReconRebel]

At 8/28/05 01:40 AM, Newgrundling wrote:

At 8/28/05 12:17 AM, YoinK_VineS wrote: Those stats sure are old.. a few of us in the top 10 have made some big changes since february.

yeah, like I said, I was quoting Jonthomson from February :-P

So not only did you post something that was completely redundant but something that was already outdated and therefore considered useless info. Was there a reason for it? You seem to be posting a lot more since your return.

[ReconRebel]

At 8/28/05 02:59 AM, Newgrundling wrote:

At 8/28/05 02:10 AM, ReconRebel wrote: So not only did you post something that was completely redundant

redundant? to what? he asked a question, I was answering it

Redundant: Repeated or duplicated unnecessarily.

but something that was already outdated and therefore considered useless info.

He seemed to think it wasn't useless, I'm sorry that you seem to..

Uh, he asked for a current list didn't he?

At 8/27/05 04:22 PM, Auz wrote: I don't need an old list, but a list of the top 100 (or 1000) reviewers at this moment.

Hey look at that!

Hey, if you want to go around telling people that water is wet and the sky is blue that's your prerogative. Kinda pointless though.

Was there a reason for it?

he ASKED

Yeah I know. You said that already.

did you turn into a complete dick while I was gone or did I just misunderstand the tone of your post?

Couldn't resist firing the first shot 'eh kid?

I think of myself as an intelligent, sensitive human being with the soul of a clown which always forces me to blow it at the most important moments. I still can't stand you.

[Tommy]

To nudge my opinion in here on what seems to be a completely stupid argument t obeggin with.

Newgrundling gave the best infomation he knew avalible, even if it wasn't up to date im sure it still gave the user who asked the question what he wanted. (Even if it was up to date he wouldn't have know the difference).

So i can't see how Newgrundling has done anything wrong at all.

Sorry RR thats just how i see it.

[jonthomson]

At 8/28/05 03:20 AM, ReconRebel wrote: I think of myself as an intelligent, sensitive human being with the soul of a clown which always forces me to blow it at the most important moments. I still can't stand you.

That's funny, because there's an awful lot of people around here that used to like you who now perceive you as a dick.

[Auz]

At 8/28/05 07:01 AM, Tom_s00 wrote: Newgrundling gave the best infomation he knew avalible, even if it wasn't up to date im sure it still gave the user who asked the question what he wanted.

Well I either wanted an easy way to see the top 100 or the latest top 100 (and I wouldn't mind giving it an update if necessary). I managed to update the list Newgrundling posted (took me only an hour) and even though I couldn't find the profiles of a couple of people, I think it's quite accurate now.
(I think those people changed their alias, does any of you know who these users are now?: Shikyoh, spinn3r, Kirkus, BigJilm, mjc4, Tha_Evil_Umpire, tabitha123, WeeNfan, Look_At_My_Beaver, MAYORCHEESE, KFC_Clock)

I made an HTML-File with links to all the profiles so that it's easier for me to keep it up to date. Of course I would prefer the easy way to see the top 100 or a more up to date list, but like I said, I didn't mind giving it an update. I still have my list now =)

[Auz]

At 8/28/05 03:20 AM, ReconRebel wrote:

At 8/27/05 04:22 PM, Auz wrote: I don't need an old list, but a list of the top 100 (or 1000) reviewers at this moment.

Hey look at that!

Hmm, sorry for the double post, but it seemed to be my fault that this topic is nearly a flame war, not ReconRebels. I should've said that I didn't mind updating it in my first post. Anyway, like I said, I have my list now, thank you all for helping me out.

[ReconRebel]

At 8/28/05 03:43 AM, Newgrundling wrote:

At 8/28/05 03:20 AM, ReconRebel wrote: I still can't stand you.

You can go fuck yourself.

Fuck myself? Fuck me and you'll never go back to women!

At 8/28/05 07:01 AM, Tom_s00 wrote: Newgrundling gave the best infomation he knew avalible,

He usually has the best information period. Ever notice the whistle link in my sig?

even if it wasn't up to date im sure it still gave the user who asked the question what he wanted. (Even if it was up to date he wouldn't have know the difference).

So i can't see how Newgrundling has done anything wrong at all.

He didn't. He simply posted obsolete info and I played on it.

Sorry RR thats just how i see it.

If what you just said is true then why be sorry Tom?

At 8/28/05 07:59 AM, jonthomson wrote:

At 8/28/05 03:20 AM, ReconRebel wrote: I think of myself as an intelligent, sensitive human being with the soul of a clown which always forces me to blow it at the most important moments. I still can't stand you.

That's funny, because there's an awful lot of people around here that used to like you who now perceive you as a dick.

That's okay jon. I know there's a few assholes on this site so I should fit right in ;-)

At 8/28/05 12:45 PM, Auz wrote: Hmm, sorry for the double post, but it seemed to be my fault that this topic is nearly a flame war.

... and people say the Wi/Ht? forum is boring.

Heh

[RedCircle]

I'm sorry.

But, you are not allowed to have drama in this forum without me being a part of it.

*sticks tongue out*

*smiles*

[reges-gravi]

i looove ng

[Xiivi]

Lot of pointless arguing, especially when this would have more easily resolved everything.
http://ngtlexp.idohost.com/rev-031305.html
(mirror: http://mymarilyn.net../exp/rev-031305.html
)
These are indeed dated (yet more recent than what Newgrundling gave you). Yet, you said there were people you couldn't locate due to name changes and such, well, now since there are all the profiles linked there you should have an easier time shifting through them. Also from that other list you only had 100 people to go off of, while others could have certainly made the top 100 and nudged some out. Thus, the list can now be more accurate for you now. :D

[XwaynecoltX]

001 10122 XwaynecoltX (unch)
002 7038 KWAS71KCK (unch)

Heh that was some time ago, but kinda neat to look back on...

~X~

[ReconRebel]

At 8/28/05 08:13 PM, Newgrundling wrote: Sorry about the hositility by the way, I was just upset because I thought we got along well... and yeah I know what I was posting was months out of date, but it was the best thing I could find, and I always try to post what little I can, so I guess that makes a lot of what I do stupid, but I'm only trying to help

You shouldn't feel bad about that little exchange we had Newgrundling. "It takes a great deal of character strength in order to apologize. A person must possess himself and have a deep sense of security in fundamental principles and values."

... and for the record, I'm sorry too.

They say love makes the world go round. I say that's bullshit. Raspberry cider makes it go round twice as fast! With that said I'm heading home to get hammered.

[Auz]

At 8/28/05 11:10 PM, Xiivi wrote: Lot of pointless arguing, especially when this would have more easily resolved everything.
http://ngtlexp.idohost.com/rev-031305.html

(mirror: http://mymarilyn.net../exp/rev-031305.html

)

Thanks, that helped a lot. I'm nearly finished updating now, I found many of the profiles I couldn't find (I currently have a top 65, so maybe I can make a top 100 again). Too bad there's something wrong with my computer, otherwise I wouldn've been finished by now.

I think some of you might want to know how the list is now, so is it okay if I post the list here once it's finished? (I guess there's a good reason why the old thread was locked, so that's why I ask)

[Auz]

At 8/29/05 03:18 PM, Newgrundling wrote: Since you're doing it by hand and the crawling/stat whoring from the past was cut off before it became a problem, I would say it's more than fine if you post the list you've already updated, and I'm sure a lot of WI/HT-ers would be interested in it

Alright then =), I present you all, the updated top 50 reviewers list:

1) 11288 XwaynecoltX
2) 10523 KWAS71KCK
3) 04649 MI4_REAL_2001
4) 04439 M-A-R-C-U-S
5) 04419 RyanAn
6) 04303 Cyberdevil
7) 04185 YoinK_VineS
8) 03656 j00bie
9) 02706 X-Naut
10) 2499 Hamy_jamy

11) 2464 Violet-AIM
12) 2172 thepromaster
13) 2080 artificial
14) 2061 EVIL-C
15) 1981 Compdude
16) 1932 DUDE4U
17) 1626 Seizure_Dog
18) 1604 jonthomson
19) 1556 AntiGravity
20) 1475 DevastatoR_da_X

21) 1462 Bezman
22) 1400 angstdrillhead
23) 1398 zackdaman03
24) 1332 Livecorpse
25) 1250 Dxkpower
26) 1249 Septemb3r
27) 1228 Tiger_Chick
28) 1171 OrgGladiator
29) 1166 Archile
30) 1115 -Mj

31) 1109 HeRetiK
32) 1062 kospas
33) 1055 ramagi
34) 0998 carmelhadinosaur
35) 0995 darkmage8
36) 0987 FatherGilpin
37) 0984 Dizfunktion
38) 0954 bila
39) 0936 The_Obsession
40) 0922 ontarget

41) 0915 Darklilangel
42) 0905 vdibv
43) 0905 ShinKosai
44) 0871 Daedo_The_Mofo
45) 0865 MappyTheKlown
46) 0849 Mizz_Caramba
47) 0847 RandomFreak
48) 0846 FireHound
49) 0845 RoweNuts
50) 0841 Fatblimp23

The next 5 people are:

51) 0815 EZ3
52) 0809 GAMECUBICLE
53) 0802 AnzRage (New)
54) 0801 Havok44
55) 0769 bumcheekcity

The number of reviews might differ by a few (cause that has been updated a few hours ago), but the list should be correct now. If anybody found a mistake, I'll be glad to hear it.

[Xiivi]

Very nice list Auz, thanks for the update, yet it is ALWAYS a plus if you add the profile links for the users, I always like to click the names of people who were close (like 5 off) and see if one passed the other. ;)

[Auz]

At 8/29/05 04:23 PM, Xiivi wrote: Very nice list Auz, thanks for the update, yet it is ALWAYS a plus if you add the profile links for the users, I always like to click the names of people who were close (like 5 off) and see if one passed the other. ;)

Yeah, well I was thinking about expanding it a bit of course. Making it a top 100, adding links to profiles, a number behind the names to show how much they climbed in rank etc. Adding links to profiles wouldn't be that hard since I made the list in a HTML-file (I hope that's how you call that), so that it would be easier for me to update it later. Posting the links is just a matter of copying and pasting. I'll do that next time, unless you really want the list with links right now of course.

[carmelhadinosaur]

At 8/29/05 04:12 PM, Auz wrote: Alright then =), I present you all, the updated top 50 reviewers list:

Awesome! Very appreaciated, thanks!! (:)

I'm 34 after all this time HAHAHA...
Oh and I just lost another review today! lol

[AnzRage]

53) Hehe Kool even though I stopped for a while.

[Auz]

A top 100, including links to profiles this time, I have to do it in two parts, sorry. Here's part 1 (I hope everything will look nice):

1) 11297 XwaynecoltX
2) 10539 KWAS71KCK
3) 04649 MI4_REAL_2001
4) 04439 M-A-R-C-U-S
5) 04419 RyanAn
6) 04303 Cyberdevil
7) 04185 YoinK_VineS
8) 03656 j00bie
9) 02707 X-Naut
10) 2499 Hamy_jamy
11) 2462 Violet-AIM
12) 2172 thepromaster
13) 2080 artificial
14) 2059 EVIL-C
15) 1981 Compdude
16) 1932 DUDE4U
17) 1626 Seizure_Dog
18) 1604 jonthomson
19) 1556 AntiGravity
20) 1475 DevastatoR_da_X
21) 1462 Bezman
22) 1399 angstdrillhead
23) 1398 zackdaman03
24) 1332 Livecorpse
25) 1257 Septemb3r(+1)
26) 1250 Dxkpower(-1)
27) 1228 Tiger_Chick
28) 1171 OrgGladiator
29) 1166 Archile
30) 1117 -Mj
31) 1106 HeRetiK
32) 1062 kospas
33) 1055 ramagi
34) 1015 chrisjericho(New)
35) 0997 carmelhadinosaur
36) 0995 darkmage8
37) 0987 FatherGilpin
38) 0955 Dizfunktion
39) 0955 bila
40) 0936 The_Obsession
41) 0922 Novocane
42) 0915 Darklilangel
43) 0906 ShinKosai(+1)
44) 0905 vdibv(-1)
45) 0871 Daedo_The_Mofo
46) 0865 MappyTheKlown
47) 0849 Mizz_Caramba
48) 0847 RandomFreak
49) 0845 FireHound
50) 0845 RoweNuts

One new member who made 600 reviews in a few months =S

[Auz]

Yah, it looked nice =), now here's part 2:

51) 0840 Fatblimp23
52) 0815 EZ3
53) 0810 GAMECUBICLE
54) 0802 AnzRage
55) 0801 Havok44
56) 0769 bumcheekcity
57) 0765 ornery_scotsman
58) 0761 Zamochit-
59) 0756 wegra2
60) 0741 Admiral8Q
61) 0740 MasterStalker
62) 0721 AncientX
63) 0713 pauliojr
64) 0712 xvllvx
65) 0698 Jeffshaw
66) 0684 UND
67) 0683 RTFlash
68) 0682 Hydecka
69) 0682 SwitchBladeClock
70) 0671 stick0
71) 0650 doodytheclownfan
72) 0643 PepsiClock
73) 0643 swive
74) 0642 gfoxcook
75) 0635 jetninjin
76) 0633 Tha_Evil_Umpyre
77) 0627 Klacid
78) 0622 Geminate
79) 0621 Umsutfeersme
80) 0618 pickmeup
81) 0618 cannibus_clock
82) 0615 -Dawkins-
83) 0614 Master_Inuyasha
84) 0612 Pink_Floyd
85) 0611 NasFlash
86) 0607 Beowulf_Hawk
87) 0603 ZombieLennon
88) 0602 HardJudge
89) 0598 agak12
90) 0594 MegaGold
91) 0592 innphernoe
92) 0590 crackakillin
93) 0585 R3dF0x
94) 0583 tabitha123
95) 0578 Mp3Durahell
96) 0574 MAYORMCHEESE
97) 0572 dw817
98) 0571 Iauruth
99) 0571 WeeNfan157
100)0568 Credic2

It took me some time, but it's finally done. Updating it now isn't that much work, so I'll be happy to update it once a week or twice a week or whatever. I hope everybody's happy with it.

[Tommy]

Wow thats really good : )

Im sure alot of people will appreciate it.

It would probably benifit the list if you made a new thread.

[Auz]

At 8/30/05 02:00 PM, Tom_s00 wrote: Wow thats really good : )

Im sure alot of people will appreciate it.

It would probably benifit the list if you made a new thread.

I agree, a bit weird that this started with a question, so yeah I think it'll be better to make a new thread.

[Frostbreath]

At 8/30/05 02:02 PM, Auz wrote: I agree, a bit weird that this started with a question, so yeah I think it'll be better to make a new thread.

That would be best, yes. And i'm glad that list is up and running. It really motivates you to start review more :) Good job on the update, by the way.

[Auz]

At 8/30/05 02:16 PM, Frostbreath wrote:

At 8/30/05 02:02 PM, Auz wrote: I agree, a bit weird that this started with a question, so yeah I think it'll be better to make a new thread.

That would be best, yes. And i'm glad that list is up and running. It really motivates you to start review more :) Good job on the update, by the way.

Thanks =) Now I think it would be better if a mod locked this thread cause I've made the new thread a few moments ago. Thanks to all the people who helped, I don't think I could've made it without their help.

[RedCircle]

Go here for an update:

http://www.newground../topic.php?id=336255